Optimization of process parameters and part geometry for high diameter tube hydroforming
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this research is to study the feasibility of vases with tube hydroforming, identifying the limits of this technology. The goal of the simulation study was the identification of the maximum pressure needed to realize vases with big diameter and length. Initially the attention was focused on the realization of a square vase geometry. The initial tubes have a high diameter of 120 mm. Many simulations were conducted to optimize process parameters for this square geometry, namely actuators stroke and water pressure, but it wasn’t possible to completely achieve the die shape at the protrusion edges due to the big diameter expansion and to the rib geometries (thickness, height and fillet radii). Different vase geometries characterized by lower diameter expansion and same dimension of the ribs, were tested. The formability results were improved but there are still problems when the material is filling the ribs (material breakage). In order to realize a safe square part, it was necessary to optimize the rib geometrical dimensions. Other simulations were conducted for a round vase geometry, to check the maximum diameter expansion. Some general design rules were finally summarized.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (8)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiratheranat S., Strano M., Shiuan-Guang S., Altan T.:Virtual process development in tube hydroforming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146, 130–136, 2004.10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00853-7 ↗
2. Lang L.H., Wang Z.R., Kang D.C., Yuan S.J., Zhang S.H., Danckert J., Nielsen K.B.: Hydroforming highlights: sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 151, 165–177, 2004.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032 ↗
3. Koc M., Altan T.: An overall review of the tube hydroforming (THF) technology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 108, 384-393, 2001.10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00830-X ↗
4. Bortot P., Ceretti E., Giardini, C.: The determination of flow stress of tubular material for hydroforming applications, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 203: 381-388, 2008.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.047 ↗
5. Hwang Y.-M., Chen W.-C.: Analysis of Tube Hydroforming in a Square Cross-Sectional Die, International Journal of Plasticity, 21: 18151833, 2005.
6. Koç M., Allen T., Jiratheranat S., Altan T.: The Use of FEA and Design of Experiments to Establish Design Guidelines for Simple Hydroformed Parts, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 40: 2249–2266, 2000.10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00047-X ↗
7. Manabe K.-I., Amino M.: Effects of Process Parameters and Material Properties on Deformation Process in Tube Hydroforming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 123: 285–291, 2002.10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00094-8 ↗
8. Fiorentino A., Ceretti E., Attanasio A., Braga D., Giardini C.: Experimental Study of Lubrication Influence in the Production of Hydroformed T-joint Tubes, Key Engineering Materials Vols. 410–411 pp. 15–24 online at http://www.scientific.net Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, 2009.