Experimental development of RSM techniques for surface quality prediction in metal cutting applications
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this work is to analyze the influence of cutting conditions on surface roughness with slot end milling on AL7075-T6. The considered parameters are: cutting speed, feed, depth of cutting and mill radial engage. Response surface models based on experimental data obtained with physical tests have been developed, the authors have performed a consistent set of experimental tests based on design points selected within the four-dimensional design space. Each test has been repeated 3 times to ensure the stability of the collected statistical data. These well distributed results has been subsequently used to create RS models through approximation techniques based on polynomial and neural network methods and to verify their reliability in terms of correct responses behaviour. The obtained results show that the most significant factors affecting the surface roughness are feed and speed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (7)
Show source-provided references
1. Montgomery, D. C., Introduction to statistical quality control (2end ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 86-87, 1990.
2. Tan, F. P., & Creese, R. C.- A generalized multipass machining model for machining parameter selection in turning. International Journal of Production Research, 33(5), pp. 1467–1487, 1995.10.1080/00207549508930221 ↗
3. Taramen, K., Multi-machining output-multi independent variable turning research by response surface methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 12(2), pp. 233–245, 1974.10.1080/00207547408919552 ↗
4. Lee, Y. H., Shin, H. M., & Yang, B. H., An approach for multi-criteria simulation optimization with application to turning operation. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 30(3), pp. 375–386, 1996.10.1016/0360-8352(96)00022-8 ↗
5. Fuh, K., & Chang, H., An accuracy model for the peripheral milling of aluminum alloys using response surface design. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 72(1), pp. 42–47, 1997.10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00127-1 ↗
6. Engineous Software - iSIGHT Version 3.0 User's Guide - 2008.
7. Weissinger, J. Lift distribution of swept-back wings. NACA pp.1120, 1947.