journal article·2015-04

Constrained tensile stretching of steel strips under different lubrication: predicting macroscopic strain distributions with microstructural inputs

V. Basavaraj, S. K. Shekhawat, K. Narasimhan, I. Samajdar

Publisher page

Abstract

Drawing Quality (DQ) and Interstitial Free (IF) steel strips, of identical specimen geometry, were uniaxially stretched using two servo hydraulic actuators moving in opposite directions at the same speed. Two strain levels were achieved, in a bending under tension testing setup, using a rigid cylindrical pin at the center of the respective strips. Different lubrication conditions brought into differences in microstructural developments and in macroscopic strain distributions. The latter was measured from digital image correlations, while measurements of in-grain misorientations and crystallographic textures were extrapolated into strain hardening exponent of Hollomon law (n) and normal anisotropy coefficient ( $$ \overline{r} $$ ). Finite element simulations were used to predict macroscopic strain distributions, assuming constant and varying (with strain) material properties of n and $$ \overline{r} $$ . Predictions with variable material properties, as estimated from experimental microstructural data, were superior, having the least mean squared error (MSE). This study not only reiterates clear possibilities of incorporating microstructural inputs in a continuum model, but establishes efficacy of the same in relatively complex forming environment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Tisza M, Fulop T (2001) A general overview of tribology of sheet metal forming. J Technol Plast 2:11–25
2. Eriksen M (1997) The influence of die geometry on tool wear in deep drawing. Wear 207:10–1510.1016/S0043-1648(96)07461-3 ↗
3. Matuszak A (2000) Factors influencing friction in steel sheet forming. J Mat Proc Tech 106:250–25310.1016/S0924-0136(00)00625-7 ↗
4. Han SS (1997) The influence of tool geometry on friction behavior in sheet metal forming. J Mat Proc Tech 63:129–13310.1016/S0924-0136(96)02612-X ↗
5. Samuel M (2002) Influence of drawbead geometry on sheet metal forming. J Mater Proc Tech 122:94–10310.1016/S0924-0136(01)01233-X ↗
6. Hao S, Klamecki BE, Ramalingam S (1999) Friction measurement apparatus forsheet metalforming. Wear 224:1–710.1016/S0043-1648(98)00288-9 ↗
7. Deng Z, Wang XJ, Cai JN (1993) Friction characteristics experimental study on galvanized steel sheets: proceedings of the fourthinternational conference on technology of plasticity. Beijing, PRChina, pp 1788–1792
8. Nakamura S, Yoshida M, Nishimoto A, Kokan N (1988) Frictional characteristics of coated steel sheets: proceedings of the conferenceon controlling sheet metal forming processes, IDDRG’88, pp. 16–18
9. Nanayakkara NKBMP, Kelly Hodgson GP (2005) Application of bending under tension test to determine the effect of tool radius and the contact pressureon the coefficient of friction in sheet metal forming. Mater Forum 29:114–118
10. Andreasen JL, Olsson DD, Chodnikiewicz K, Bay N (2006) Bending under tension test with direct friction measurement. Eng Manuf 220:73–8010.1243/095440505X32913 ↗
11. Coubrougha GJ, Alinger MJ, Van Tyne CJ (2002) Angle of contact between sheet and die during stretch-bend deformation as determined on the bending-under tension friction test system. J Mater Proc Tech 130–131:69–7510.1016/S0924-0136(02)00781-1 ↗
12. Alinger MJ, Van Tyne CJ (2003) Evolution of die surfaces during repeated stretch- bend sheet steel deformation. J Mater Proc Tech 141:411–41910.1016/S0924-0136(03)00390-X ↗
13. Emmens WC, Vanden Boogarard AH (2009) Incremental forming by continuous bending under tension—an experimental investigation. J Mater Proc Tech 209:5456–546310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.023 ↗
14. Gong H, Lou Z, Zhang Z (2004) Studies on the friction and lubrication characteristics in the sheet steel drawing process. J Mater Proc Tech 151:328–33310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.082 ↗
15. Bech J, Bay N, Eriksen M (1998) A study of mechanisms of liquid lubrication in metal forming. Annals of the CIRP47 (1):221–22610.1016/S0007-8506(07)62822-4 ↗
16. Schey JA (1994) Interactions of lubricants and zinc coatings: Proceedings of the Conference on Recent Developments in SheetMetal Forming Technology, IDDRG’94, pp. 177–188.
17. Kim H, Sung JH, Sivakumar R, Altan T (2007) Evaluation of stamping lubricants using the deep drawing test. J Mach Tools Manuf 47(14):2120–213210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.04.014 ↗
18. Deng Z, Lovell MR (2000) Effects of lubrication and die radius on the friction behavior of Pb-coated sheet steels. Wear 244:41–5110.1016/S0043-1648(00)00430-0 ↗
19. Meiler M, Pfestorf M, Geiger M, Merklein M (2003) The use of dry film lubricants in aluminum sheet metal forming. Wear 255:1455–146210.1016/S0043-1648(03)00087-5 ↗
20. Ramezani M, Ripin ZM (2009) Effect of Friction Models on Stress Distribution of Sheet Materials during V-Bending Process. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, pp 32
21. Van-Houtte P (1995) MTM-FHM software system, version 2. MTM, KULeuven
22. Bunge HJ (1982) Texture analysis in materials science. Butterworths, London
23. Raveendra S, Kanjarla AK, Paranjape H, Mishra SK, Delannay L, Samajdar I, Van Houtte P (2011) Strain mode dependence of deformation texture developments: microstructural origin. Metall Mater Trans A 42A:2113–212410.1007/s11661-010-0580-0 ↗
24. Aernoudt E, Van Houtte P,Leffers T (1993) Plastic Deformation and Fracture of Materials, edited by Mughrabi H (Vol. 6 of Materials Science and Technology: A comprehensive treatment, edited by Cahn RW, Haasen P and Kramer EJ) VCH, Weinheim (Germany) 89–136
25. Nowell MM, Wright SI (1984) Orientation effects on indexing of electron backscattered diffraction patterns. Ultramicroscopy 103:41–5810.1016/j.ultramic.2004.11.012 ↗
26. Mishra SK, Desai SG, Pant P, Narasimhan K, SamajdarI (2009) Improved predictability of forming limit curves through microstructural inputs. Intl J Metal Form 2:59–6710.1007/s12289-009-0391-2 ↗
27. Delannay L, Jacques PJ, Kalidindi SR (2006) SInt J Plasticity 22:1879–189810.1016/j.ijplas.2006.01.008 ↗
28. Yerra SK, Vankudre HV, Date PP, Samajdar I (2004) Effect of strain path on the formability of a low carbon steel—on the textural and microtextural developments. ASME Trans J Engg Mat Tech 126:53–6110.1115/1.1631435 ↗
29. Hutchinson WB (1984) Development and control of annealing textures in low carbon steel. Int Met Rev 29:25–4110.1179/imtr.1984.29.1.25 ↗
30. Hill R (1948) A theory of yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc Roy Soc London A 193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
31. PAMSTAMP 2G PAMTUBE (2008) 2G, ‘Metal forming’, User’s Guide
32. Wang W, Wagoner RH, Wang XJ (1996) Measurement of friction under sheet forming conditions. Metal Mat Trans A 27A:3971–398110.1007/BF02595646 ↗
33. Wilkund D, Rosen BG, Gunnarsson L (2008) Frictional mechanisms in mixed lubricated regime in steel sheet metal forming. Wear 264:474–47910.1016/j.wear.2006.08.032 ↗
34. Desai SG, Date PP (2006) On the quantification of strain distribution in drawn sheet metal products. J Mater Proc Tech 177:439–44310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.090 ↗
35. Hecker SS, Stout MG, Staudhammer KP, Smith JL (1982) Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless steel—1. Magnetic measurements and mechanical behavior. Metall Trans A 13:619–62610.1007/BF02644427 ↗
36. Mishra SK, Narasimhan K, Samajdar I (2007) Deformation twinning in AISI 316 L austenitic stainless steel—role of strain and strain path. Mater Sci Tech 23:1118–112610.1179/174328407X213242 ↗