journal article·2016-07

Mechanical property of magnesium alloy sheet with hardening deterioration at warm temperatures and its application for failure analysis: Part II – failure analysis

Chulhwan Lee, Youngwoo Koh, Dong-Yoon Seok, Hyungjong Kim, Myoung-Geun Lee, Kwansoo Chung

Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanical properties of a thin AZ31B Mg alloy sheet (with the thickness of 0.5 mm) were characterized for its anisotropy, temperature-dependent hardening (including its deterioration) and strain rate sensitivity based on simple tension test data measured at 100 °C, 150 °C, 200 °C, 250 °C, respectively, in Part I. As for anisotropy, simple tension tests were performed along three (rolling, transverse and in-between) directions to calibrate the Hill1948 yield function. As for temperature-dependent hardening, hardening as well as its deterioration (or softening) behavior observed beyond the uniform elongation limit was numerically characterized based on the inverse calibration method, in which strain rate sensitivity was also considered. The mechanical properties were confirmed to properly predict failure by strain localization for all the simple tension tests involved in the characterization procedure. Ultimately, the mechanical properties characterized in Part I were applied in Part II to analyze the failure by strain localization in the cross-shaped cup drawing tests developed as the benchmark problem for the NUMISHEET2011 conference [1]. The results showed that the mechanical properties with hardening deterioration properly predicted failure, while hardening without deterioration (obtained following the common practice) did not, confirming the importance of including the hardening deterioration in tensile property characterization, especially to predict forming failure by strain localization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim H, Kim HY (2011) Benchmark 2: Simulation of the Cross-shaped Cup Deep-drawing Process. In: Huh, H., Chung, K., Han, S.S., Chung, W.J. (Ed.). The NUMISHEET 2011 Benchmark Study of the 8th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Korea
2. Doege E, Dröder K (2001) Sheet metal forming of magnesium wrought alloys — formability and process technology. J Mater Process Technol 115(1):14–19. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00760-910.1016/S0924-0136(01)00760-9 ↗
3. Lee S, Chen Y-H, Wang J-Y (2002) Isothermal sheet formability of magnesium alloy AZ31 and AZ61. J Mater Process Technol 124(1–2):19–24. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00038-910.1016/S0924-0136(02)00038-9 ↗
4. Chen F-K, Huang T-B (2003) Formability of stamping magnesium-alloy AZ31 sheets. J Mater Process Technol 142(3):643–647. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00684-810.1016/S0924-0136(03)00684-8 ↗
5. Kim HY, Choi SC, Kim HJ, Hong SM, Shin YS, Lee GH (2008) Forming limit of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheet in the deep drawing with cross-shaped die. Int J Mod Phys B 22(31n32):6045–605010.1142/S0217979208051558 ↗
6. El-Morsy A-W, Manabe K-I (2006) Finite element analysis of magnesium AZ31 alloy sheet in warm deep-drawing process considering heat transfer effect. Mater Lett 60(15):1866–1870. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.03910.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.039 ↗
7. Lee YS, Kim MC, Kim SW, Kwon YN, Choi SW, Lee JH (2007) Experimental and analytical studies for forming limit of AZ31 alloy on warm sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 187–188(0):103–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.11810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.118 ↗
8. Ren LM, Zhang SH, Palumbo G, Sorgente D, Tricarico L (2009) Numerical simulation on warm deep drawing of magnesium alloy AZ31 sheets. Mater Sci Eng A 499(1–2):40–44. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.13210.1016/j.msea.2007.11.132 ↗
9. Choi SC, Kim HY, Hong SM, Shin YS, Lee GH, Kim HJ (2009) Evaluation and prediction of the forming limit of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheets in a cross-shaped cup deep drawing process. Met Mater Int 15(4):575–584. doi: 10.1007/s12540-009-0575-910.1007/s12540-009-0575-9 ↗
10. Cockcroft MG, Latham DJ (1968) Ductility and workability of metals. J Inst Met 96(2):33–39
11. Brozzo P, Deluca P, Redina R (1972) A new method for the prediction of formability limits in metal sheets. Paper presented at the Proc. 7th biennal Conf.IDDR
12. Ayada M, Higashino T, Mori K (1987) Central bursting in extrusion of inhomogeneous materials. Adv Technol Plast 1:553–558
13. Oyane M, Sato T, Okimoto K, Shima S (1980) Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications. J Mech Work Technol 4(1):65–8110.1016/0378-3804(80)90006-6 ↗
14. Kim S-W, Lee Y-S (2013) Comparative Study on Failure Prediction in Warm Forming Processes of Mg Alloy Sheet by the FEM and Ductile Fracture Criteria. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B:1–9
15. Chung K, Kim H, Lee C (2014) Forming limit criterion for ductile anisotropic sheets as a material property and its deformation path insensitivity. Part I: deformation path insensitive formula based on theoretical models. Int J Plast 58:3–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.009 ↗
16. Chung K, Lee C, Kim H (2014) Forming limit criterion for ductile anisotropic sheets as a material property and its deformation path insensitivity, part II: boundary value problems. Int J Plast 58(0):35–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.01410.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.014 ↗
17. Al-Samman T, Gottstein G (2008) Dynamic recrystallization during high temperature deformation of magnesium. Mater Sci Eng A 490(1–2):411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.00410.1016/j.msea.2008.02.004 ↗
18. Koike J, Ohyama R, Kobayashi T, Suzuki M, Maruyama K (2003) Grain-boundary sliding in AZ31 magnesium alloys at room temperature to 523 K. Mater Trans 44(4):445–45110.2320/matertrans.44.445 ↗
19. Seok D-Y, Kim D, Kim S-W, Bak J, Lee Y-S, Chung K (2014) Fracture Criterion for AZ31 Mg Alloy Plate at Elevated Temperature. Metals and Materials International (Accepted)10.1007/s12540-015-1007-7 ↗
20. ABAQUS (2010). (User’s Manual (Version 610), Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc, USA
21. Handbook A Vol. 2, 1990. Properties & Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special Purpose Materials, ASM International, Materials Park, OH
22. Palaniswamy H, Ngaile G, Altan T (2004) Finite element simulation of magnesium alloy sheet forming at elevated temperatures. J Mater Process Technol 146(1):52–60. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00844-610.1016/S0924-0136(03)00844-6 ↗
23. Hanna MD, Carter JT, Mahayotasanun N Tribological Behavior of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy Sheet During Sliding at High Temperatures. In: ASME/STLE 2007 International Joint Tribology Conference, 2007. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 717–71910.1115/IJTC2007-44077 ↗
24. Hwang YM, Wang KH, Kuo TY Friction Tests in Magnesium Tube Hydroforming at Elevated Temperatures. In: THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL ESAFORM CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL FORMING: ESAFORM 2011, 2011. vol 1. AIP Publishing, pp 1765–176910.1063/1.3589771 ↗