Blank shape optimization in sheet metal Hydromechanical Deep Drawing (HDD)
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to perform a successful sheet metal forming operation and to avoid shape deviations and tearing and wrinkling defects, process and material variables, such as tools geometry, blankholder force, friction, blank shape, sheet thickness and material properties, should be optimized. One of the main parameters which must be defined at the beginning of any sheet metal forming process design is the initial blank shape and its main dimensions [1]. In this paper, the authors’ attention is focused on a non-conventional sheet HDD process for which optimal blank shape and dimensions are not fully explored yet [2]. It will be demonstrated that, when the traditional One Step finite element method calculation, realised through the implicit code, is applied to HDD, the process shows various limits. In fact, while the One Step analysis is able to predict the optimal initial blank for the traditional Deep Drawing (DD) process, the same blank could not be the optimal one in a HDD process. The goal of this paper is to develop a methodology by which, with the aid of optimization algorithms, it will be possible for the user to define the best shape and dimensions for the initial blank in HDD processes, even when starting from the blank obtained by a One Step analysis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. Mohammad Habibi Parsa, Payam Pournia, Optimization of initial blank shape predicted based on inverse finite element method, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 43 (2007) 218–233.10.1016/j.finel.2006.09.005 ↗
2. Huang-Chi Tseng, Zong-Chun Wu, Chinghua Hung, Ming-Hu Lee, Chin-Chuan Huang, Investigation of Optimum Process Parameters on the Sheet Hydroforming of Titanium / Aluminum Clad Metal for Battery Housing, 4th International Conference on Tube Hydroforming (TUBEHYDRO 2009) September 6–9, 2009, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. (7)
3. Hariharasudhan Palaniswamy, Gracious Ngaile, Taylan Altan, Optimization of blank dimensions to reducespringback in the flexforming process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 146 (2004) 28–34.10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00841-0 ↗
4. K. Hariharan, C. Balaji, Material optimization: A case study using sheet metal-forming analysis, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 324–331.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.063 ↗
5. Wang Hu, Li Guang Yao, Zhong Zhi Hua, Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by adaptive response surface based on intelligent sampling method, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 197 (2008) 77–88.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.018 ↗
6. H. Naceur, Y.Q. Guo, J.L. Batoz, Blank optimization in sheet metal forming using an evolutionary algorithm, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 151 (2004) 183–191.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.036 ↗
7. Vijay Pegada, Young Chun, Sridhar Santhanam, An algorithm for determining the optimal blank shape for the deep drawing of aluminium cup, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 125–126 (2002) 743–750.10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00382-5 ↗
8. HyperMorph® Manual Version 9.0, Altair® Engineering, 2008.
9. HyperStudy® Manual Version 9.0, Altair® Engineering, 2008.