Damage dependent stress limit model for failure prediction in bulk forming processes
Source abstract
Abstract
Stress limit, combined with deformation and orientation dependent damages, is proposed as the criterion for failure prediction in bulk forming processes. Dedicatedly designed experiments are carried out to investigate this model. The results verify the existence of the stress limits. The value of stress limit can vary in different directions due to the material processing histories. The experiments revealed also strong kinematical hardening behaviours for the investigated material. The constitutive law has to include this effect to evaluate the stresses with sufficient precision. © 2010 Springer-Verlag France.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Lin J, Liu Y, Dean TA (2005) A review on damage mechanisms, models and calibration methods under various deformation conditions. Int J Damage Mech 14:299–31910.1177/1056789505050357 ↗
2. Lemaitre JA (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Tech 107:83–8910.1115/1.3225775 ↗
3. Gurson A (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth, Part I: yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile materials. J Eng Mater Tech 99:2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
4. Oyane M et al (1979) Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications. J Mech Work Tech 4:65–8110.1016/0378-3804(80)90006-6 ↗
5. Gouveia B et al (1996) Fracture predicting in bulk forming. Int J Mech Sci 38(4):361–37210.1016/0020-7403(95)00069-0 ↗
6. McAllen P et al (2005) A method for the prediction of ductile fracture by central bursts in axisymmetric extrusion. Mech Eng Sci Part C 219:237–25010.1243/095440605X16820 ↗
7. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–4810.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
8. Bonora N, Gentile D, Pirondi A (2004) Identification of the parameters of a non-linear continuum damage mechanics model for ductile failure in metals. J Strain Analysis 39(6):639–65110.1243/0309324042379356 ↗
9. Abaqus Analysis User’s manual (2007) Damage initiation for ductile metals, section 19.2.2 Version 6.7
10. Hora P, Tong L, Berisha B (2007) Stress limit model with deformation dependent damage for failure prediction in bulk forming processes, NumiForm 2007, Porto Portugal, pp. 1401–1406
11. Barlat F et al (2005) Linear transformation-based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21:1009–103910.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
12. Chaboche JL (1989) Constitutive equations for cyclic plasticity and cyclic viscoplasticity. Int J Plast 5:247–30210.1016/0749-6419(89)90015-6 ↗
13. Berisha B et al (2008) Modeling of dynamic strain aging with a dislocation-based isotropic hardening model and investigation of orthogonal loading. In: 9th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, pp. 185–186