Plastic instabilities analysis during T-shaped tubes hydro-forming process
Source abstract
Abstract
During T-shaped or Y-shaped tubes hydroforming the tube wall is flatten on the external die. This “in die” forming involves an important compressive stress along the outer normal direction directly related to the inflating pressure. In this particular case plastic instabilities and damage evolution are strongly dependent on the sign of hydrostatic stress. Hydroforming simulations of T-shaped and Y-shaped thick tubes are performed using an elastoplastic model implemented in Forge-2005 (fully implicit Finite Element Method code). A three dimensional analysis is ran using tetrahedral solid elements. An augmented Modified Maximum Force Criterion coupled to an undamage behavior law is expressed in the sheet tangent plan basis. This criterion is compared to a fully coupled Lemaitre damage model. Due to low triaxiality state, damage only growth in specifical regions. This study highlights the interest of continuum damage modeling for the formability and the final part load carrying capacity prediction for “in die” hydroforming.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Jirathearanat S et al (2001) Hydroforming Y-shaped stainless steel exhaust components. Tube Pipe J
2. Fann KJ, Hsiao PY (2003) Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 140:52010.1016/S0924-0136(03)00778-7 ↗
3. Chenot J-L, Massoni E (2006) Finite element modelling and control of new metal forming processes. I J Mach Tools Manuf 46:119410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.031 ↗
4. Jansson M, Nilsson L, Simonsson K (2008) On strain localisation in tube hydroforming of aluminium extrusions. J Mater Process Technol 195:310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.040 ↗
5. Kwan CT, Lin CY, Luo YS, Hu WB, Jau TC (2004) Die shape design for T-shaped tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23:16910.1007/s00170-003-1588-z ↗
6. Song WJ, Kim J, Kang BS (2007) Experimental and analytical evaluation on flow stress of tubular matrial for tube hydroforming simulation. J Mater Process Technol 191:36810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.034 ↗
7. Brunet M, Mguil-touchal S, Morestin F (1998) Analytical and experimental studies of necking in sheet forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:4010.1016/S0924-0136(98)00131-9 ↗
8. Ben-Tahar M (2005) Contribution a l’etude et la simulation du procede d’hydroformage. Ph.D. thesis, ENSMP/CEMEF Sophia-Antipolis
9. Bouchard PO, Fayolle S, Mocellin K (2006) 3D numerical modeling of mechanical joining processes–from joining down to structural analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on computational structures technology. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain pp 657–658
10. Saanouni K, Chaboche J-L (2003) Comprehencive structural integrity. ISBN: 0-08-043749-4
11. Cherouat A, Saanouni K, Hammi Y (2002) Numerical improvement of thin tubes hydroforming with respect to ductile damage. Int J Mech Sci 44:242710.1016/S0020-7403(02)00177-7 ↗
12. Belamri N (2004) Modelisation numerique de decoupage de toles laminees. Application au cisaillage et au refendage en 3d. Ph.D. thesis, Universite de Technologie de Troyes
13. Doghri I, Billardon R (1995) Investigation of localisation due to damage in elasto-plastic materials. Mech Mater 19:12910.1016/0167-6636(94)00011-5 ↗
14. Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2005) On the cut-off value of negative triaxiality for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 72:1049–106910.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.011 ↗
15. Hwang YM, Lin TC, Chang WC (2007) Experiments on T-shaped hydroforming with counter punch. J Mater Process Technol 192–193:234
16. Surdon G, Chenot J-L (1986) Finit element calculations of three-dimenssional hot forging. Int Conf Numer Methods Ind Form Process Numiform’86:287
17. Aydemir A, de Vree al JHP (2005) An adaptive simulation approach designed for tube hydroforming processes. J Mater Process Technol 159:30310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.018 ↗
18. Leujeune A, Boudeau N, Gelin JC (2003) Influence of material and process parameters on bursting during hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 143–144:1110.1016/S0924-0136(03)00295-4 ↗
19. Strano M, Jirathearanat S, Altan T (2001) Adaptive FEM simulation for tube hydroforming: a geometry based approach for wrinkle detection. J Mater Process Technol Ann. CIRP 50/1159:18510.1016/S0007-8506(07)62101-5 ↗
20. Saanouni K (2006) Virtual metal forming including the ductile damage occurrence. Actual state of the art and main perspectives. J Mater Process Technol 177:19
21. Gelin JC, Labergere C, Thibaud S (2006) Modelling and process control for the hydroforming of mettalic liners used for hydrogen storage. J Mater Process Technol 177:69710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.109 ↗
22. Lorentzo P, Ingarao G, Gagliardi F, Filice L (2008) Experimental validation of optimisation strategies in hydroforming of T-shaped tubes. Int J Mater Form 1(S1):323–32610.1007/s12289-008-0060-x ↗