Determination of the onset of yielding and the Young’s modulus after a change in the loading direction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The onset of plastic deformation is an important parameter for an accurate description of the flow curve and the Young’s modulus. Determining the actual physical start of flow is already experimentally challenging for classic sheet metal materials. In addition to the experimental challenge, the onset of flow depends on numerous parameters such as strain rate, temperature and forming history. Non-proportional load paths in particular can significantly influence the onset of flow. Three different materials, a micro-alloyed steel HC340LA, a dual-phase steel CR330Y590-DP and an aluminium alloy AA6016-T4 are investigated in this publication. The physical onset of flow of the materials is determined at three different pre-strain levels as well as without and with a change in the load direction. Temperature-based approaches are used for this purpose. In-situ synchrotron diffraction is used to validate the results obtained. Those results can help to improve existing material models and springback prediction. Such models rely on material parameters that are as accurate as possible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Lian J, Liu W, Gastañares X et al (2022) Plasticity evolution of an aluminum-magnesium alloy under abrupt strain path changes. Int J Mater Form 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01692-610.1007/s12289-022-01692-6 ↗
2. Tarigopula V, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M et al (2008) Elastic-plastic behaviour of dual-phase, high-strength steel under strain-path changes. Eur J Mech A Solids 27:764–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.01.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.01.002 ↗
3. Tarigopula V, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M et al (2009) An evaluation of a combined isotropic-kinematic hardening model for representation of complex strain-path changes in dual-phase steel. Eur J Mech A Solids 28:792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.12.00410.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.12.004 ↗
4. Zaman SB, Barlat F, Kim J-H (2018) Deformation-induced anisotropy of uniaxially prestrained steel sheets. Int J Solids Struct 134:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.02910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.029 ↗
5. Qin J, Holmedal B, Hopperstad OS (2018) A combined isotropic, kinematic and distortional hardening model for aluminum and steels under complex strain-path changes. Int J Plast 101:156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.10.01310.1016/j.ijplas.2017.10.013 ↗
6. Larsson R, Björklund O, Nilsson L et al (2011) A study of high strength steels undergoing non-linear strain paths—Experiments and modelling. J Mater Process Technol 211:122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.00410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.004 ↗
7. Wen W, Borodachenkova M, Tomé CN et al (2016) Mechanical behavior of low carbon steel subjected to strain path changes: Experiments and modeling. Acta Mater 111:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.07510.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.075 ↗
8. Manopulo N, Hora P, Peters P et al (2015) An extended Modified Maximum Force Criterion for the prediction of localized necking under non-proportional loading. Int J Plast 75:189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.02.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2015.02.003 ↗
9. Ha J, Lee M-G, Barlat F (2013) Strain hardening response and modeling of EDDQ and DP780 steel sheet under non-linear strain path. Mech Mater 64:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.04.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2013.04.004 ↗
10. Barlat F, Ferreira Duarte JM, Gracio JJ et al (2003) Plastic flow for non-monotonic loading conditions of an aluminum alloy sheet sample. Int J Plast 19:1215–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00020-710.1016/S0749-6419(02)00020-7 ↗
11. Vincze G, Butuc MC, Barlat F et al (2019) Strain path changes in aluminum. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international ESAFORM conference on material forming: ESAFORM 2019. AIP Publishing, p 160013. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.511271010.1063/1.5112710 ↗
12. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V (2020) Metallic materials – Tensile testing: Part 1: Method of test at room temperature(6892–1)
13. Müller W, Pöhlandt K (1996) New experiments for determining yield loci of sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 60:643–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02399-010.1016/0924-0136(96)02399-0 ↗
14. Banabic D, Huetink H (2006) Determination of the yield locus by means of temperature measurement. Proceedings of the 9nd international ESAFORM conference on material forming: ESAFORM 2006:359–362
15. Vitzthum S, Hartmann C, Eder M et al (2019) Temperature-based determination of the onset of yielding using a new clip-on device for tensile tests. Procedia Manuf 29:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.16610.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.166 ↗
16. Vitzthum S, Rebelo Kornmeier J, Hofmann M et al (2022) In-situ analysis of the thermoelastic effect and its relation to the onset of yielding of low carbon steel. Mater Des 219:110753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11075310.1016/j.matdes.2022.110753 ↗
17. Weinschenk A, Volk W (2017) FEA-based development of a new tool for systematic experimental validation of nonlinear strain paths and design of test specimens. In: Author(s), p 20009. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.500796610.1063/1.5007966 ↗
18. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V (2016) Testing of metallic materials - Tensile test pieces(50125)
19. Hoelzel M, Gan WM, Hofmann M et al (2013) Rotatable multifunctional load frames for neutron diffractometers at FRM II—design, specifications and applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 711:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.01.04910.1016/j.nima.2013.01.049 ↗
20. Hammersley AP (2016) FIT2D : a multi-purpose data reduction, analysis and visualization program. J Appl Crystallogr 49:646–652. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671600045510.1107/S1600576716000455 ↗
21. Strunz P, Lukás P, Neov D (2001) Data evaluation procedure for high-resolution neutron diffraction methods. J Neutron Res 9:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1023816010820013110.1080/10238160108200131 ↗
22. Bragg WH (1913) The Reflection of X-Rays by Crystals. Nature 91:477. https://doi.org/10.1038/091477b010.1038/091477b0 ↗
23. Rajagopalan S, Little AL, Bourke MAM et al (2005) Elastic modulus of shape-memory NiTi from in situ neutron diffraction during macroscopic loading, instrumented indentation, and extensometry. Appl Phys Lett 86. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.186343710.1063/1.1863437 ↗
24. Qiu S, Clausen B, Padula SA et al (2011) On elastic moduli and elastic anisotropy in polycrystalline martensitic NiTi. Acta Mater 59:5055–5066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.01810.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.018 ↗
25. Wang H, Wu PD, Tomé CN et al (2012) Study of lattice strains in magnesium alloy AZ31 based on a large strain elastic-viscoplastic self-consistent polycrystal model. Int J Solids Struct 49:2155–2167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.02610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.026 ↗
26. Greaves GN (2013) Poisson’s ratio over two centuries: challenging hypotheses. Notes Rec 67:37–58. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2012.002110.1098/rsnr.2012.0021 ↗
27. Sallat G (1988) Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Fliessverhalten von Blechen im Zweiachsigen Hauptspannungszustand. Dissertation, TU Karl-Marx-Stadt, 1988
28. Vitzthum S, Kornmeier JR, Hofmann M et al (2022) In-situ analysis of the elastic-plastic characteristics of high strength dual-phase steel. Mater Sci Eng A 857:144097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14409710.1016/j.msea.2022.144097 ↗
29. Eigenmann B, Macherauch E (1996) Röntgenographische Untersuchung von Spannungszuständen in Werkstoffen. Teil III. Fortsetzung von Matwiss. und Werkstofftechn. Heft 3/1995, S. 148–160 und Heft 4/1995, S. 199–216. Materialwissenschaft Werkst 27:426–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.1996027090710.1002/mawe.19960270907 ↗
30. Zhong ZY, Brokmeier H-G, Gan WM et al (2015) Dislocation density evolution of AA 7020–T6 investigated by in-situ synchrotron diffraction under tensile load. Mater Charact 108:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.00410.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.004 ↗
31. Zhang XX, Lutz A, Andrä H et al (2021) Evolution of microscopic strains, stresses, and dislocation density during in-situ tensile loading of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Int J Plast 139:102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10294610.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102946 ↗
32. Yoshida F, Uemori T, Fujiwara K (2002) Elastic–plastic behavior of steel sheets under in-plane cyclic tension–compression at large strain. Int J Plast 18:633–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00049-310.1016/s0749-6419(01)00049-3 ↗
33. Sun L, Wagoner RH (2011) Complex unloading behavior: Nature of the deformation and its consistent constitutive representation. Int J Plast 27:1126–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.12.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2010.12.003 ↗
34. Barlat F, Vincze G, Grácio JJ et al (2014) Enhancements of homogenous anisotropic hardening model and application to mild and dual-phase steels. Int J Plast 58:201–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.002 ↗
35. Barlat F, Yoon S-Y, Lee S-Y et al (2020) Distortional plasticity framework with application to advanced high strength steel. Int J Solids Struct 202:947–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.05.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.05.014 ↗
36. Lee J, Lee J-Y, Barlat F et al (2013) Extension of quasi-plastic–elastic approach to incorporate complex plastic flow behavior – application to springback of advanced high-strength steels. Int J Plast 45:140–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.01110.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.011 ↗
37. Lee S-Y, Yoon S-Y, Kim J-H et al (2023) Evaluation of loading-path-dependent constitutive models for springback prediction in martensitic steel forming. Int J Mech Sci 251:108317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10831710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108317 ↗