journal article·2021-11

Stamped part classification and automatic dieface design

E. Di Pasquale, J. L. Duval

Publisher page

Abstract

In the context of weight reduction for new car design, it is essential to downsize, or rather optimize, the Body In White (BIW) structure. A very effective approach is to take into account the influence of Manufacturing process in the performance analysis such as crash or fatigue. Further, integrating the interaction between Stamping and Crash performance should also improve the predictability of the CAE approach and lead to more efficient design. One-step simulation of sheet metal forming is a very promising technology for this application, as it can be used on the same mesh as crash analysis and can work with a simplified dieface. However, a Dieface, although simplified, must be generated for nearly all parts of the vehicle model. Hence, the implementation of product-process coupling on an industrial scale requires the development of methodologies for automatic dieface design imbedding sheet metal forming expertise. Dieface generation depends on the geometrical features of the part, but we understand the latter only if we have a framework in terms of dieface features. The authors show that such a development requires an innovative approach to stamped part classification, based both on the geometrical features of the part and on the possible strategies in dieface development. Beside its novelty, this classification has the advantage of using a decision tree based only on a vector of quantitative features, thus making it possible to implement it in automatic decision support software. An application based on a real world BiW is presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhou D, Wagoner RH (1995) Development and application of sheet metal forming simulation. J Mater Process Technol 50:1–1610.1016/0924-0136(94)01366-9 ↗
2. Makinouchi A (1996) Sheet metal forming simulation in industry. J Mater Process Technol 60:19–2610.1016/0924-0136(96)02303-5 ↗
3. Guo YQ, Batoz JL, Detraux JM, Duroux P (1990) Finite element procedure for strain estimation of sheet metal forming parts. Int J Num Meth Eng 30(8):1385–140110.1002/nme.1620300804 ↗
4. Mouatassim M, Thomas B, Jameux JP, Di Pasquale E (1995) An industrial finite element code for one-step simulation of sheet metal forming. In: Shen, Dawson (eds) Simulation of materials processing : theory, methods and applications. Balkema, Rotterdam
5. Di Pasquale E (2016) Multi scale models for flexure deformation in sheet metal forming. In: Proc NUMIFORM10.1051/matecconf/20168006002 ↗
6. Le Roch Y, Duval JL, Di Pasquale E (1998) Coupled sheet metal forming and fatigue simulation. In: Proc IDDRG
7. Greco F et al (2018) Finite element simulation of the dynamic behaviour of deep drawn components with accurate thickness description. Finite Elem Anal Des 138:12–2010.1016/j.finel.2017.10.004 ↗
8. Taupin L (2004) Chaining PAM-CRASH and PAM-STAMP, ACI achieves cost and mass reduction. PAM-TALK, Summer
9. Shenk O, Hillmann M (2004) Optimal design of metal forming die surfaces with evolution strategies. Comput Struct 82:1695–170510.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.055 ↗
10. Narainen R, Pozner H (2016) Die Starter: A new system to manage early feasibility in sheet metal forming. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 73410.1088/1742-6596/734/3/032124 ↗
11. Liu SC et al (1996) Development of an automatic part feature extraction and classification system taking CAD data as input. Computers in Industry 29:137–15010.1016/0166-3615(95)00081-X ↗
12. Wang E, Kim YS (1998) Form feature recognition using convex decomposition: results presented at the 1997 ASME CIE Feature Panel Session. Comput Aided Des 30(13):983–98910.1016/S0010-4485(98)00058-X ↗
13. Qamhiyah AZ et al (1996) Geometric reasoning for the extraction of form features. Comput Aided Des 28(11):887–90310.1016/0010-4485(96)00015-2 ↗
14. Pilani R et al (2000) A hybrid intelligent systems approach for die design in sheet metal forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16:370–37510.1007/s001700050168 ↗
15. Nasr ESA et al (2006) A new methodology for extracting manufacturing features from CAD system. Computers & Industrial Engineering 51:389–41510.1016/j.cie.2006.08.004 ↗
16. Sugar P et al (2011) Technology -based sheet metal classification and coding system. Journal for Technology of Plasticity 36(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10211-011-0005-010.2478/v10211-011-0005-0 ↗
17. Gupta RK, Gurumoorthy B (2013) Classification, representation, and automatic extraction of deformation features in sheet metal parts. Comput Aided Des 45:1469–148410.1016/j.cad.2013.06.010 ↗
18. Gupta RK et al (2017) Generic classification and representation of shape features in sheet-metal parts. In: Kumar S, Hussein HMA (eds) AI applications in sheet metal forming. Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore10.1007/978-981-10-2251-7_2 ↗
19. Kumar S et al (2017) Feature extraction and manufacturability assessment of sheet metal parts. In: Kumar S, Hussein HMA (eds) AI applications in sheet metal forming. Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore10.1007/978-981-10-2251-7_3 ↗
20. Lemaitre J, Chaboche J-l (1994) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge Univ Press
21. Lee JK, Kinzel GL, Wagoner RH (eds.) (1996) Proc 3rd Int Conf, NUMISHEET, Dearborm