Experimental and numerical study of the closure of voids with different size and various locations in the three-dimensional cogging process
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, a new forging system was developed and a new complex methodology was tested for the analysis of the closure of voids. The effective geometric shapes of anvils and optimal the forging parameters has been determined. A new cogging process provided a complete closure of voids, which was confirmed by experimental tests. The effect of the reduction ratio, original anvil shape, forging ratio and the location and size of introduced voids on the efficiency of void closure during the multi-transition cogging process was assessed. Moreover, the following were used for the evaluation of void closure: the hydrostatic stress around voids, stress triaxiality, effective strain around voids, and the critical reduction ratio. Numerical examinations were performed using the finite element method (FEM) for the three-dimensional forging process at elevated temperature. Computer simulations of the cogging process under investigation were carried out using a program DEFORM-3D, and selected simulation results were compared with experimental test results. Void reduction predictions obtained from the FEM analysis were in good agreement with the experimental findings. The test results are supplemented with the prediction of crack formation in the zone of existing voids and within the forging volume during the multi-transition cogging process.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Lin YC, Liu YX, Liu G et al (2015) Prediction of Ductile Fracture Behaviors for 42CrMo Steel at Elevated Temperatures. J Mater Eng Perform 24:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11665-014-1273-4/TABLES/410.1007/S11665-014-1273-4/TABLES/4 ↗
2. Cao TS, Mazière M, Danas K, Besson J (2015) A model for ductile damage prediction at low stress triaxialities incorporating void shape change and void rotation. Int J Solids Struct 63:240–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2015.03.00310.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2015.03.003 ↗
3. Chun MS, Van Tyne CJ, Moon YH (2006) FEM analysis of void closure behaviour during open die forging of rectangular billets. Steel Res Int 77:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/SRIN.20060636310.1002/SRIN.200606363 ↗
4. Zhang XX, Cui ZS, Chen W, Li Y (2009) A criterion for void closure in large ingots during hot forging. J Mater Process Technol 209:1950–1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2008.04.05110.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2008.04.051 ↗
5. Wang B, Zhang J, Xiao C et al (2015) Analysis of the evolution behavior of voids during the hot rolling process of medium plates. J Mater Process Technol 221:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2015.02.01210.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2015.02.012 ↗
6. Lee YS, Lee SU, Van Tyne CJ et al (2011) Internal void closure during the forging of large cast ingots using a simulation approach. J Mater Process Technol 211:1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2011.01.01710.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2011.01.017 ↗
7. Kakimoto H, Arikawa T, Takahashi Y et al (2010) Development of forging process design to close internal voids. J Mater Process Technol 210:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2009.09.02210.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2009.09.022 ↗
8. Chen MS, Lin YC (2013) Numerical simulation and experimental verification of void evolution inside large forgings during hot working. Int J Plast 49:53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2013.02.01710.1016/J.IJPLAS.2013.02.017 ↗
9. Kim Y, Cho J, Bae W (2011) Efficient forging process to improve the closing effect of the inner void on an ultra-large ingot. J Mater Process Technol 211:1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2011.01.00110.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2011.01.001 ↗
10. Chen K, Yang Y, Shao G, Liu K (2012) Strain function analysis method for void closure in the forging process of the large-sized steel ingot. Comput Mater Sci 51:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2011.07.01110.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2011.07.011 ↗
11. Chen MS, Lin YC, Chen KH (2014) Evolution of elliptic-cylindrical and circular-cylindrical voids inside power-law viscous solids. Int J Plast 53:206–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2013.08.00510.1016/J.IJPLAS.2013.08.005 ↗
12. Saby M, Bernacki M, Roux E, Bouchard PO (2013) Three-dimensional analysis of real void closure at the meso-scale during hot metal forming processes. Comput Mater Sci 77:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2013.05.00210.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2013.05.002 ↗
13. Chen K, Liu K, Chen H, Yang Y (2014) A criterion for void closure in the porous model during the forging of steel ingot and its application. Comput Mater Sci 91:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2014.04.05610.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2014.04.056 ↗
14. Feng C, Cui Z (2015) A 3-D model for void evolution in viscous materials under large compressive deformation. Int J Plast 74:192–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2015.06.01210.1016/J.IJPLAS.2015.06.012 ↗
15. Feng C, Cui Z, Liu M et al (2016) Investigation on the void closure efficiency in cogging processes of the large ingot by using a 3-D void evolution model. J Mater Process Technol 237:371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.030 ↗
16. Christiansen P, Hattel JH, Bay N, Martins PAF (2014) Physical modeling and numerical simulation of V-die forging ingot with central void: 101177/0954406213517878 228:2347–2356. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440621351787810.1177/0954406213517878 ↗
17. Xin R, Ma Q, Li W (2016) Microstructure and mechanical properties of internal crack healing in a low carbon steel. Mater Sci Eng A 662:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2016.03.04510.1016/J.MSEA.2016.03.045 ↗
18. Carlton HD, Haboub A, Gallegos GF et al (2016) Damage evolution and failure mechanisms in additively manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 651:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2015.10.07310.1016/J.MSEA.2015.10.073 ↗
19. Geisler A, Sadeghifar M, Morin JB et al (2023) Void closure during open die forging of large size martensitic stainless-steel ingots: an experimental-analytical-numerical study. Int J Mater Form 16:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12289-022-01735-Y/FIGURES/910.1007/S12289-022-01735-Y/FIGURES/9 ↗
20. Kukuryk M (2015) Analysis of deformation and microstructural evolution in the hot forgingof the Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Arch Metall Mater 60:1639–1647. https://doi.org/10.1515/AMM-2015-028610.1515/AMM-2015-0286 ↗
21. Zhang L, Shen W, Zhang C et al (2017) Numerical simulation of different types of voids closure in large continuous casting billet during multi-pass stretching process. Procedia Eng 207:532–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2017.10.81710.1016/J.PROENG.2017.10.817 ↗