journal article·2022-05

Relevant material characterization for load prediction in incremental forming

A. Abdelkefi, D. Guines, L. Léotoing, S. Thuillier

Publisher page

Abstract

Robotic incremental sheet forming has arisen a recent industrial interest, as a more flexible and cost-effective solution to the process using rigid computer numerical control (CNC) machines. However, the numerical prediction of the forming loads and final geometry coupled to an elastic modeling of the robot is essential to optimize the robot trajectory and thus to ensure the geometrical accuracy of the final part. Within this context, the aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of the load prediction in the case of a single point incremental forming process of a commercially pure (CP) titanium alloy sheet. The mechanical behavior is characterized at room temperature under two strain states, i.e., uniaxial and biaxial tension, and a truncated cone of the same material is obtained by single point incremental forming. A 3D cell records all the components of the applied load during the forming and the part is laser scanned at the end of the process, though still clamped along the outer edge. A numerical model of the process is developed assuming some symmetries to reduce the computational time. The influence of the hardening law, either identified from the uniaxial or biaxial tensile tests, on the forming load prediction is investigated, with a focus on the strain path during single point incremental forming.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Belchior J, Leotoing L, Guines D, Courteille E, Maurine P (2014) A process/machine coupling approach: application to robotized incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Technol 214(8):1605–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.005 ↗
2. Belchior J, Guillo M, Courteille E, Maurine P, Léotoing L, Guines D (2013) Off-line compensation of the tool path deviations on robotic machining: application to incremental sheet forming. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 29:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2012.10.00810.1016/j.rcim.2012.10.008 ↗
3. Ambrogio G, Costantino I, De Napoli L, Filice L, Fratini L, Muzzupappa M (2004) Influence of some relevant process parameters on the dimensional accuracy in incremental forming: a numerical and experimental investigation. J Mater Process Technol 154:501–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.13910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.139 ↗
4. Han F, MO J, Qi H (2013) Springback prediction for incremental sheet forming based on FEM-PSONN technology. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23:1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62567-410.1016/S1003-6326(13)62567-4 ↗
5. Duflou J, Habraken AM, Cao J, Malhotra R, Bambach M, Adams D, Vanhove H, Mohammadi A, Jeswiet J (2018) Single point incremental forming: state-of-the-art and prospects. Int J Mater Forming 11:743–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1387-y10.1007/s12289-017-1387-y ↗
6. Henrard C (2008) Numerical Simulations of the Single Point Incremental Forming Process, PhD thesis, Université de Liège, Belgium
7. Emmens WC, Van Den Boogard AV (2009) An overview of stabilizing deformation mechanisms in incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Technol 209:3688–3695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.00310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.003 ↗
8. Yamashita M, Gotoh M, Atsumi SY (2008) Numerical simulation of incremental forming of sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 199:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.03710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.037 ↗
9. Fratini L, Ambrogio G, Di Lorenzo R, Filice L, Micari F (2005) Three-dimensional FE simulation of single point incremental forming: experimental evidences and process design improving. VIII International Conference on Computational Plasticity, Complas VIII, Barcelona
10. Ceretti E, Giardini C, Attanasio A (2004) Experimental and simulative results in sheet incremental forming on CNC machines. J Mater Process Technol 152:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.024 ↗
11. Hadoush A, Van Den Boogard AH (2009) Substructuring in the implicit simulation of single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 2:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0402-310.1007/s12289-009-0402-3 ↗
12. Sena JIV, De Sousa RA, Valente RAF (2010) Single point incremental forming simulation with an enhanced assumed strain solid-shell finite element formulation. Int J Mater Form 3:963–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0929-310.1007/s12289-010-0929-3 ↗
13. Belchior J, Guines D, Leotoing L, Ragneau E (2013) Force prediction for correction of robot tool path in single point incremental forming Key Eng Mater 554:1282–1289. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.128210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.1282 ↗
14. Abdelkefi A, Guines D, Léotoing L, Thuillier S (2019) Influence of the mechanical model of titanium T40 on the predicted forces during incremental forming process. AIP Conf Proc 2113:170010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.511272610.1063/1.5112726 ↗
15. Bouffioux C, Henrard C, Gu J, Duflou J, Habraken AM, Sol H (2007) Development of an inverse method for identification of materials parameters in the single point incremental forming process. IDDRG10.1007/s12289-008-0183-0 ↗
16. Belchior J (2013) Développement d’une approche couplée matériau/structure machine: application au formage incrémental robotisé, PhD thesis, INSA Rennes
17. Flores P, Duchene L, Bouffioux C, Lelotte T, Henrard C, Pernin N, Habraken AM (2007) Model identification and FE simulations: effect of different yield loci and hardening laws in sheet forming. Int J Plast 23:420–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.006 ↗
18. Said LB, Mars J, Wali M, Dammak F (2017) Numerical prediction of the ductile damage in single point incremental forming process. Inter J Mech Sci 131:546–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.02610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.026 ↗
19. Duc-Toan N, Jin-Gee P, Young-Suk K (2010) Combined kinematic/isotropic hardening behavior study for magnesium alloy sheets to predict ductile fracture of rotational incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 3:939–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0923-910.1007/s12289-010-0923-9 ↗
20. Benedetti M, Fontanari V, Monelli B, Tassan B (2017) Single-point incremental forming of sheet metals: Experimental study and numerical simulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. J Eng Manuf 231:301–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541561235110.1177/0954405415612351 ↗
21. Henrard C, Bouffioux C, Eyckens P, Sol H, Duflou JR, Van Houtte P, Habraken AM (2011) Forming forces in single point incremental forming: prediction by finite element simulations, validation and sensitivity. Comput Mech 47:573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-010-0563-410.1007/s00466-010-0563-4 ↗
22. Liu W, Guines D, Leotoing L, Ragneau E (2016) Identification of strain rate-dependent mechanical behaviour of DP600 under in-plane biaxial loadings. Mat Sci Eng A 676:366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.12510.1016/j.msea.2016.08.125 ↗
23. Eyckens P, Belkassem B, Henrard C, Gu J, Sol H, Habraken AM, Van Houtte P (2011) Strain evolution in the single point incremental forming process: digital image correlation measurement and finite element prediction. Inter J Mater Form 4:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0995-610.1007/s12289-010-0995-6 ↗
24. Emmens WC, Van Den Boogaard AH (2009) An overview of stabilizing deformation mechanisms in incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Technol 209:3688–3695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.00310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.003 ↗
25. Neto DM, Martins JMP, Oliveira MC, Menezes LF, Alves JL (2016) Evaluation of strain and stress states in the single point incremental forming process. Int J Advan Manuf Techn 85(1–4):521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7954-910.1007/s00170-015-7954-9 ↗
26. Butuc M, Barlat F, Gracio J, Vincze G (2013) A theoretical study of the effect of the double strain path change on the forming limits of metal sheet. Key Eng Mater 554:127–138. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.12710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.127 ↗
27. Zhang S, Leotoing L, Guines D, Thuillier S, Zang SL (2014) Calibration of anisotropic yield criterion with conventional tests or biaxial test. Int J Mech Sci 85:142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.02010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.020 ↗
28. Leotoing L, Guines D (2015) Investigations of the effect of strain path changes on forming limit curves using an in-plane biaxial tensile test. Int J Mech Sci 99:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.05.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.05.007 ↗
29. Song X (2018) Identification of forming limits of sheet metals with an in-plane biaxial tensile test, PhD thesis, INSA Rennes
30. Bannon BP, Mild EE (1983) Titanium Alloys for Biomaterial Application: An Overview, Titanium Alloys in Surgical Implants. A Symposium ASTM STP 796:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP28931S10.1520/STP28931S ↗
31. Saidi B, Laurence G, Boulila M, Cherouat A, Nasri R (2016) Etude expérimentale et numérique des efforts lors du formage incrémental de tôles en titane. JET 2016, Hammamet, Tunisie
32. Sakhtemanian MR, Honarpisheh M, Amini S (2018) Numerical and experimental study on the layer arrangement in the incremental forming process of explosive-welded low-carbon steel/CP-titanium bimetal sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Techn 95:3781–3796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1462-z10.1007/s00170-017-1462-z ↗
33. Araújo R, Teixeira P, Silva M, Reis A, Martins PA (2013) Single point incremental forming of a medical implant. Key Eng Mater 1388–1393 104028. https://www.scientific.net/kem.554-557.1388. Accessed 10 Mar 202210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.1388 ↗
34. Araújo R, Teixeira P, Montanari L, Reis A, Silva MB, Martins PA (2014) Single point incremental forming of a facial implant. Prosthet Orthot Int 38:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/030936461350207110.1177/0309364613502071 ↗
35. Pham QT, Lee MG, Kim YS (2019) Characterization of the isotropic-distortional hardening model and its application to commercially pure titanium sheets. Int J Mech Sci 160:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.02310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.023 ↗
36. Ishiki M, Kuwabara T, Hayashida Y (2011) Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening behavior of pure titanium sheet using spline function. Int J Mater Forming 4:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-1024-510.1007/s12289-010-1024-5 ↗
37. Baral M, Hama T, Knudsen E, Korkolis YP (2018) Plastic deformation of commercially-pure titanium: experiments and modeling. Int J Plas 105:164–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.02.009. Accessed 10 Mar 202210.1016/j.ijplas.2018.02.009 ↗
38. Bathini U (2010) A Study of Microstructure, Tensile Deformation, Cyclic Fatigue and Final Fracture Behavior of Commercially Pure Titanium and a Titanium Alloy. PhD Thesis. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/. Accessed 10 Mar 2020
39. Revil-Baudard B (2010) Simulation du comportement mécanique des alliages de titane pour les procédés de mise en forme à froid. PhD thesis, Mines ParisTech (in French)10.1051/meca/2010029 ↗
40. Hannon A, Tiernan P (2008) A review of planar biaxial tensile test systems for sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 198:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.015 ↗