journal article·2017-08

BEM computation of 3D Stokes flow including moving front

M.-Q. Thai, F. Schmidt, G. Dusserre, A. Cantarel, L. Silva

Publisher page

Abstract

Liquid composite molding (LCM) includes all composite-manufacturing methods, where the liquid state resin is forced into the dry preformed reinforcement. In this study, numerical simulation of the resin infusion is presented based on a coupled approach involving Boundary Element Method (BEM) and Level Set Method. The method developed can handle stationary and transient flows by solving the Stokes equations. The numerical results on a square packed set of fibers show excellent agreement with the analytical model. The comparison between experimental and simulation results of flow front patterns revealed a fair accordance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Composite Material Mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Beukers A (2001) Polymer matrix composites : applications. Encyclopedia of Materials : Science and Technology. Elsevier, Oxford. p 7384–738810.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01318-8 ↗
2. Jones RM (1998) Mechanics of composite materials. CRC Press
3. Gantois R (2012) Contribution à la modélisation de l’écoulement de résine dans les procédés de moulage des composites par voie liquide. In Thesis. Université de Toulouse
4. Patel N, Lee LJ (1995) Effects of fiber mat architecture on void formation and removal in liquid composite molding. Polym Compos 16(5):386–39910.1002/pc.750160507 ↗
5. Rouison D, Sain M, Couturier M (2004) Resin transfer molding of natural fiber reinforced composites: cure simulation. Compos Sci Technol 64(5):629–64410.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.001 ↗
6. Gantois R, Cantarel A, Dusserre G, Félices JN, Schmidt F (2010) Numerical simulation of resin transfer molding using BEM and level set method. Int J Mater Form 3(1):635–63810.1007/s12289-010-0850-9 ↗
7. Silva L, Puaux G, Vincent M, Laure P. A monolithic finite element approach to compute permeabilityatc microscopic scales in LCM processes. Int J Mater Form 3(1):619–62210.1007/s12289-010-0846-5 ↗
8. Chen X, Papathanasiou TD (2007) Micro-scale modeling of axial flow through unidirectional disordered fiber arrays. Compos Sci Technol 67:1286–129310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.011 ↗
9. Brebbia CA, Dominguez J (1992) Boundary elements: an introductory course. Computational Mechanics Publications, 2nd edition
10. Paris F, Canas J (1997) Boundary element method : fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press
11. Osher S, Sethian JA (1988) Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79(1):12–4910.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2 ↗
12. Sethian JA (1999) Level set methods and fast marching methods evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science. Cambridge University Press, 2e édition
13. Liu Y, Moulin N, Bruchon J, Liotier P-J, Drapier S (2016) Towards void formation and permeability predictions in LCM processes: a computational bifluid–solid mechanics framework dealing with capillarity and wetting issues. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 344(4–5):236–25010.1016/j.crme.2016.02.004 ↗
14. Abouorm L, Moulin N, Bruchon J, Drapier S (2013) Monolithic approach of Stokes-Darcy coupling for LCM process modelling. Current state-of-the-art on material forming: numerical and experimental approaches at different length-scales, PTS 1–3. 554–557:447–45510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.447 ↗
15. Trochu F, Ruiz E, Achim V, Soukane S (2006) Advanced numerical simulation of liquid composite molding for process analysis and optimization. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 37(6):890–90210.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.003 ↗
16. Colicchio G, Greco M, Faltinsen OM (2006) A BEM-level set domain-decomposition strategy for non-linear and fragmented interfacial flows. Vol. 67. Chichester, ROYAUME-UNI: Wiley. 1385–141910.1002/nme.1680 ↗
17. Garzon M, Adalsteinsson D, Gray L, Sethian JA (2005) A coupled level set-boundary integral method for moving boundary simulations. Interfaces Free Boundaries 7(3):277–30210.4171/IFB/125 ↗
18. Gantois R, Cantarel A, Cosson B, Dusserre G, Felices J-N, Schmidt F (2013) BEM-based models to simulate the resin flow at macroscale and microscale in LCM processes. Polym Compos 34(8):1235–124410.1002/pc.22531 ↗
19. Soukane S, Trochu F (2006) Application of the level set method to the simulation of resin transfer molding. Compos Sci Technol 66(7–8):1067–108010.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.001 ↗
20. Gebart BR (1992) Permeability of unidirectional reinforcements for RTM. J Compos Mater 26:1100–113310.1177/002199839202600802 ↗
21. Berdichevsky AL, Cai Z (1993) Preform permeability predictions by self-consistent method and finite element simulation. Polym Compos 14(2):132–14310.1002/pc.750140207 ↗
22. Dusserre G, Jourdain E, Bernhart G. Effect of deformation on knitted glass preform in-plane permeability. Polym Compos 32(1): 18–2810.1002/pc.21011 ↗
23. Sharma S (2010) On the improvement of permeability assessment of fibrous materials. In MS Aerospace engineering. Wichita State University
24. Loix F, Orgéas L, Geindreau C, Badel P, Boisse P, Bloch JF (2009) Flow of non-Newtonian liquid polymers through deformed composites reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol 69(5):612–61910.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.007 ↗
25. Shirley P, Tuchman A (1990) A polygonal approximation to direct scalar volume rendering. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 24(5):63–7010.1145/99308.99322 ↗
26. Zheng X, Lowengrub J, Anderson A, Cristini V (2005) Adaptive unstructured volume remeshing – II: application to two- and three-dimensional level-set simulations of multiphase flow. J Comput Phys 208(2):626–65010.1016/j.jcp.2005.02.024 ↗
27. Duysinx P, Van Miegroet L, Jacobs T, Fleury C (2006) Generalized shape optimization using X-FEM and level set methods. In: Bendsøe MP, Olhoff N, Sigmund O (eds) IUTAM symposium on topological design optimization of structures, machines and materials: status and perspectives. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 23–3210.1007/1-4020-4752-5_3 ↗
28. Divo E, Kassab A (1997) A generalized boundary-element method for steady-state heat conduction in heterogeneous anisotropic media. Numer Heat Transfer Part B: Fundam 32(1):37–6110.1080/10407799708914998 ↗
29. Nerantzaki MS, Kandilas CB (2008) A boundary element method solution for anisotropic nonhomogeneous elasticity. Acta Mech 200(3):199–21110.1007/s00707-008-0020-z ↗
30. Gantois R, Cantarel A, Cosson B, Dusserre G, Felices J-N, Schmidt F. BEM-based models to simulate the resin flow at macroscale and microscale in LCM processes. Polym Compos 34(8): 1235–124410.1002/pc.22531 ↗
31. Schmidt FM, Lafleur P, Berthet F, Devos P (1999) Numerical simulation of resin transfer molding using linear boundary element method. Polym Compos 20(6):725–73210.1002/pc.10396 ↗
32. Hunter P, Pullan A (2003) FEM/BEM notes. Department of Engineering Science. University of Auckland, New Zealand
33. Fratantonio M, Rencis JJ (2000) Exact boundary element integrations for two-dimensional Laplace equation. Eng Anal Bound Elem 24(4):325–34210.1016/S0955-7997(00)00005-9 ↗
34. Telles FJC, Oliveira FR (1994) Third degree polynomial transformation for boundary element integrals: further improvements. Elsevier, Kidlington, Royaume-Uni
35. Newman TS, Yi H (2006) A survey of the marching cubes algorithm. Comput Graph 30(5):854–87910.1016/j.cag.2006.07.021 ↗
36. Oh S, Koo BK (2007) Data perturbation for fewer triangles in marching tetrahedra. Graph Model 69(3):211–21810.1016/j.gmod.2007.05.001 ↗
37. Sharma S, Siginer DA (2010) Permeability measurement methods in porous media of fiber reinforced composites. Appl Mech Rev 63(2):02080210.1115/1.4001047 ↗
38. Arbter R, Beraud JM, Binetruy C, Bizet L, Bréard J, Comas-Cardona S, Demaria C, Endruweit A, Ermanni P, Gommer F, Hasanovic S, Henrat P, Klunker F, Laine B, Lavanchy S, Lomov SV, Long A, Michaud V, Morren G, Ruiz E, Sol H, Trochu F, Verleye B, Wietgrefe M, Wu W, Ziegmann G (2011) Experimental determination of the permeability of textiles: a benchmark exercise. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 42(9):1157–116810.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.021 ↗
39. Vernet N, Ruiz E, Advani S, Alms JB, Aubert M, Barburski M, Barari B, Beraud JM, Berg DC, Correia N, Danzi M, Delavière T, Dickert M, Di Fratta C, Endruweit A, Ermanni P, Francucci G, Garcia JA, George A, Hahn C, Klunker F, Lomov SV, Long A, Louis B, Maldonado J, Meier R, Michaud V, Perrin H, Pillai K, Rodriguez E, Trochu F, Verheyden S, Wietgrefe M, Xiong W, Zaremba S, Ziegmann G (2014) Experimental determination of the permeability of engineering textiles: benchmark II. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 61:172–18410.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010 ↗
40. Happel J (1959) Viscous flow relative to arrays of cylinders. AICHE J 5(2):174–17710.1002/aic.690050211 ↗
41. Bruschke MV, Advani SG (1993) Flow of generalized Newtonian fluids across a periodic array of cylinders. J Rheol 37(3):479–49810.1122/1.550455 ↗
42. Shimomukai K, Kanda H (2006) Numerical study of normal pressure distribution in entrance flow between parallel plates, I. Finite difference calculations. Electron Trans Numer Anal 23:202–218
43. Subramanya K (1982) Flow in open channels, 3e. Vol. 1. Tata McGraw-Hill Education
44. Hautier M, Lévêque D, Huchette C, Olivier P (2010) Investigation of composite repair method by liquid resin infiltration. Plast Rubber Compos 39(3–5):200–20710.1179/174328910X12647080902411 ↗
45. Tabrizi SS (2012) Effect of mechanical abrasion on oil/water contact angle in metals. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA
46. Ferreira Luz F, Campus Amico S, de Lima Cunha A, Santos Barbosa E, Barbosa de Lima AG (2012) Applying computational analysis in studies of resin transfer moulding. Defect Diffus Forum 326–328 (2012) 158–163
47. Ferreira Luz F, de Lima Cunha A, Santos Barbosa E, Barbosa de Lima AG. Defect and Diffusion Forum 326–328 (2012) p 158–16310.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.326-328.158 ↗