journal article·2018-05

A composite approach for modeling deformation behaviors of thermoplastic polyurethane considering soft-hard domains transformation

A. K. Mossi Idrissa, K. Wang, S. Ahzi, S. Patlazhan, Y. Rémond

Publisher page

Abstract

Thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers (TPUs) are the most used engineering thermoplastics combining the properties for both elastomers and glassy materials. TPUs have good physical and mechanical properties, excellent chemical and abrasion resistances. Compared with typical thermoset rubbers, TPUs are easier to be processed and recycled. However, the deformation behaviors of TPUs are very complex due to their nonlinear, hysteresis, rate and temperature dependences, and softening properties. Therefore, development of a constitutive model with microstructure considerations is important for predicting the deformation behavior of TPUs under mechanical loading as well as during forming processes such as rolling and stretching. In this work, TPUs were taken as a two-phase material consisting of both hard and soft phases corresponding to their hard and soft domains. A new composite constitutive model for stress-strain response of TPUs was proposed taking into account the microstructure of TPUs as well as its evolution (hard to soft phase transformation) induced by deformation. Excellent agreement between model predictions and experimental results for the loading-unloading behaviors of two TPUs with different hard and soft segment contents confirmed the efficacy of our proposed composite constitutive model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer composites and self-healing · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Kultys A, Rogulska M, Głuchowska H (2011) The effect of soft-segment structure on the properties of novel thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers based on an unconventional chain extender. Polym Int 60(4):652–65910.1002/pi.2998 ↗
2. Zia KM, Bhatti HN, Bhatti IA (2007) Methods for polyurethane and polyurethane composites, recycling and recovery: a review. React Funct Polym 67(8):675–69210.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.05.004 ↗
3. Ryan AJ, Stanford JL, Still RH (1991) Thermal, mechanical and fracture properties of reaction injection-moulded poly (urethane-urea) s. Polymer 32(8):1426–143910.1016/0032-3861(91)90423-G ↗
4. Ryan AJ, Macosko CW, Bras W (1992) Order-disorder transition in a block copolyurethane. Macromolecules 25(23):6277–628310.1021/ma00049a026 ↗
5. Elwell MJ, Mortimer S, Ryan AJ (1994) A synchrotron SAXS study of structure development kinetics during the reactive processing of flexible polyurethane foam. Macromolecules 27(19):5428–543910.1021/ma00097a024 ↗
6. Schmalz H, Abetz V, Lange R (2003) Thermoplastic elastomers based on semicrystalline block copolymers. Compos Sci Technol 63(8):1179–118610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00039-3 ↗
7. Sánchez-Adsuar M (2000) Influence of the composition on the crystallinity and adhesion properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers. Int J Adhes Adhes 20(4):291–29810.1016/S0143-7496(99)00059-7 ↗
8. Feng F, Ye L (2011) Morphologies and mechanical properties of polylactide/thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer blends. J Appl Polym Sci 119(5):2778–278310.1002/app.32863 ↗
9. Aneja A, Wilkes GL (2003) A systematic series of ‘model’PTMO based segmented polyurethanes reinvestigated using atomic force microscopy. Polymer 44(23):7221–722810.1016/j.polymer.2003.07.007 ↗
10. Schneider N, Desper C, Illinger J, King A, Barr D (1975) Structural studies of crystalline MDI-based polyurethanes. J Macromal Sci B 11(4):527–55210.1080/00222347508219422 ↗
11. Chen-Tsai C, Thomas E, MacKnight W, Schneider N (1986) Structure and morphology of segmented polyurethanes: 3. Electron microscopy and small angle X-ray scattering studies of amorphous random segmented polyurethanes. Polymer 27(5):659–66610.1016/0032-3861(86)90121-7 ↗
12. Garrett JT, Siedlecki CA, Runt J (2001) Microdomain morphology of poly (urethane urea) multiblock copolymers. Macromolecules 34(20):7066–707010.1021/ma0102114 ↗
13. O'Sickey MJ, Lawrey BD, Wilkes GL (2002) Structure–property relationships of poly (urethane urea) s with ultra-low monol content poly (propylene glycol) soft segments. I Influence of soft segment molecular weight and hard segment content J Appl Polym Sci 84(2):229–243
14. Russo R, Thomas EL (1983) Phase separation in linear and cross-linked polyurethanes. J Macromal Sci B 22(4):553–57510.1080/00222348308224776 ↗
15. Sarva SS, Hsieh AJ (2009) The effect of microstructure on the rate-dependent stress–strain behavior of poly (urethane urea) elastomers. Polymer 50(13):3007–301510.1016/j.polymer.2009.04.025 ↗
16. Petrović ZS, Ferguson J (1991) Polyurethane elastomers. Prog Polym Sci 16(5):695–83610.1016/0079-6700(91)90011-9 ↗
17. Yi J, Boyce M, Lee G, Balizer E (2006) Large deformation rate-dependent stress–strain behavior of polyurea and polyurethanes. Polymer 47(1):319–32910.1016/j.polymer.2005.10.107 ↗
18. Buckley C, Prisacariu C, Martin C (2010) Elasticity and inelasticity of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers: sensitivity to chemical and physical structure. Polymer 51(14):3213–322410.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.069 ↗
19. Qi H, Boyce M (2005) Stress–strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Mech Mater 37(8):817–83910.1016/j.mechmat.2004.08.001 ↗
20. Lee EH Elastic-plastic deformation at finite strains. In, 1969. ASME,10.21236/AD0678483 ↗
21. Mossi Idrissa A, Ahzi S, Patlazhan S, Rémond Y, Ruch D (2012) A constitutive model for stress–strain response and mullins effect in filled elastomers. J Appl Polym Sci 125(6):4368–437510.1002/app.36596 ↗
22. Boyce MC, Parks DM, Argon AS (1988) Large inelastic deformation of glassy polymers. Part I: rate dependent constitutive model. Mech Mater 7(1):15–3310.1016/0167-6636(88)90003-8 ↗
23. Argon A (1973) A theory for the low-temperature plastic deformation of glassy polymers. Philos Mag 28(4):839–86510.1080/14786437308220987 ↗
24. Yeh F, Hsiao BS, Sauer BB, Michel S, Siesler HW (2003) In-situ studies of structure development during deformation of a segmented poly (urethane− urea) elastomer. Macromolecules 36(6):1940–195410.1021/ma0214456 ↗
25. Oshmyan VG, Patlazhan SA, Remond Y (2006) Principles of structural-mechanical modeling of polymers and composites. Polym Sci Ser A+ 48(9):1004–101310.1134/S0965545X06090173 ↗
26. Richeton J, Ahzi S, Daridon L, Rémond Y (2005) A formulation of the cooperative model for the yield stress of amorphous polymers for a wide range of strain rates and temperatures. Polymer 46(16):6035–604310.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.079 ↗
27. Gent A (1996) A new constitutive relation for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 69(1):59–6110.5254/1.3538357 ↗
28. Mossi Idrissa A, Ahzi S, Remond Y, Gracio J (2011) Modeling of the stress–birefringence–stretch behavior in rubbers using the gent model. J Eng Mater Technol 133(3):03090510.1115/1.4004053 ↗
29. Qi H, Boyce M (2004) Constitutive model for stretch-induced softening of the stress–stretch behavior of elastomeric materials. J Mech Phys Solids 52(10):2187–220510.1016/j.jmps.2004.04.008 ↗
30. Richeton J, Ahzi S, Vecchio KS, Jiang FC, Adharapurapu RR (2006) Influence of temperature and strain rate on the mechanical behaviour of three amorphous polymers: characterization and modelling of the compressive yield stress; Int. Journal of Solids and Structures 43(7–8):2318–233510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.040 ↗
31. Mossi Idrissa A (2011) Modelling and Simulation of the mechanical behaviour under finite strains of filled elastomers as function of their microstructure; PhD Thesis, University of Strasbourg