Influence of advanced yield criteria on predictions of plastic anisotropy for aluminium alloy sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Extruded aluminium alloy sheets of AA7003-T6 are characterised by performing an experimental programme and numerical simulations. The anisotropic behaviour of the aluminium alloy is investigated using two linear transformation based anisotropic yield criteria Yld2000-2d (Barlat et al. [1]) and Yld2004-18p (Barlat et al. [2]). The yield criteria are calibrated using previously reported measured values of flow stress ratios and strain ratios obtained from uniaxial tensile tests and disc compression tests. The results from the model calibrations show that Yld2004-18p gives improved prediction. The evaluation of the selected yield functions is extended by performing numerical simulations of in-plane shear tests and plane-strain tension tests using the general-purpose non-linear FE code LS-DYNA. The results from the simulations show that the constitutive model based on Yld2000-2d predicts too low strength for the determined model parameters and indicates that the shape of the yield surface is inadequate. Predictions with the constitutive model based on Yld2004-18p gave better agreement with the experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi SH, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminium alloy sheets-part I. Int J Plast 19:1297–131910.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
2. Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon JW, Karabin ME, Brem JC, Dick RE (2005) Linear transformation based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21:1009–103910.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
3. Cazacu O, Barlat F (2003) Application of the theory of representation to describe yielding of anisotropic aluminium alloys. Int J Eng Sci 41:1367–138510.1016/S0020-7225(03)00037-5 ↗
4. Banabic D, Kuwabara T, Balan T, Comsa DS, Julean D (2003) Non-quadratic yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane-stress conditions. Int J Mech Sci 45:797–81110.1016/S0020-7403(03)00139-5 ↗
5. Cazacu O, Barlat F (2004) A criterion for description of anisotropy and yield differential effects in pressure-insensitive materials. Int J Plast 20:2027–204510.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.021 ↗
6. Aretz H (2004) A non-quadratic plane stress yield function for orthotropic sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 168(1):1–910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.008 ↗
7. Hopperstad OS, Berstad T, Ilstad H, Lademo O-G, Langseth M (1998) Effects of the yield criterion on local deformations in numerical simulation of profile forming. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:551–55510.1016/S0924-0136(98)00203-9 ↗
8. Lademo OG, Berstad T, Hopperstad OS, Pedersen KO (2004a) A numerical tool for formability analysis of aluminium alloys. Part I: Theory. STEEL GRIPS 2:427–431
9. Lademo OG, Berstad T, Hopperstad OS, Pedersen KO (2004b) A numerical tool for formability analysis of aluminium alloys. Part II: Experimental validation. STEEL GRIPS 2:433–437
10. Lademo OG, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M (1999) An evaluation of yield criteria and flow rules for aluminium alloys. Int J Plast 15:191–20810.1016/S0749-6419(98)00064-3 ↗
11. Achani D (2006) Constitutive models of elastoplastictiy and fracture for aluminium alloys under strain path change. PhD Thesis, NTNU, ISBN 82-471-7903-2
12. Achani D, Eriksson M, Hopperstad OS, Lademo O-G (2007) Modelling of local necking and fracture in aluminium alloys. AIP Conf Proc 908:111–11610.1063/1.2740797 ↗
13. Achani D, Hopperstad OS, Lademo O-G (2009) Behaviour of extruded aluminium alloys under proportional and non-proportional strain paths. J Mater Process Technol, (in press)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.12.002 ↗