The Effect of Pre-Strain and Inter-Stage Annealing on the Formability of a 2024 Aluminium Alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Stretch forming of both fuselage and nacelle skins often requires multi-stage processing to achieve the final form. Finding the optimum pre-strain level before inter-stage annealing is critical to avoid failure in subsequent processes and minimise the number of processing steps. This paper examines the effect of three pre-strain levels of 4%, 8% and 12%, followed by a recovery anneal process. Both yield behaviour and material formability are analysed. The forming limit diagrams indicate an immediate drop in formability in the pre-strained and annealed samples when compared with the O condition material. The aforementioned formability drop quickly saturates for the higher pre-strain magnitudes. This saturation is also evident in the uniaxial data. The underlying material texture, as described by the r-values, remains unchanged during processing, while the yield strengths are shown to increase in an almost isotropic fashion. Overall the paper indicates that to improve the formability in subsequent processing steps, the pre-strain levels should be maximized before the recovery anneal and second forming stage.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. R. D. Edwards, Stretch Forming of Non-Ferrous Metals, Journal of the Institute of Metals, 84 (1955–56), 199–209.
2. E. N. Straatsma, L. Velterop, Influence of Heat Treatments and Straining Steps on Mechanical Properties in the Stretch Forming Process, in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Aluminium Alloys, 2004, 771–776.
3. H. H. Wisselink, A. H. van den Boogaard, Finite Element Simulation of the Stretch Forming of Aircraft Skins, in Proc Numisheet (2005), 60–65.10.1063/1.2011194 ↗
4. M. O’Donnell, Finite Element Modelling of a Multi-Stage Stretch-Forming Operation using Aerospace Alloys, PhD Thesis, University of Ulster (2003).
5. R. J. Drysdale, A. S. Bahrani, The Effect of Annealing Processes on the Limit Strains of an Aluminium Alloy, Journal of Mechanical Working Technology, 11, (1985), 105–114.10.1016/0378-3804(85)90115-9 ↗
6. J. R. Davis, Alloy and Temper Designation Systems, in Aluminium and Aluminium Alloys, ASM International, (1993), 29.
7. O.-G. Lademo, O. S. Hopperstad, M, Langseth, An Evaluation of Yield Criteria and Flow Rules for Aluminium Alloys International Journal of Plasticity, 15, (2), (1999), 191–208.10.1016/S0749-6419(98)00064-3 ↗
8. R.D. Doherty, D. A. Hughes, F. J. Humphreys, J.J. Jonas, D. J. Jensen, M. E. Kassner, W. E. King, T. R. McNelley, H. J. McQueen, A. D. Rollett, Current Issues in Recrystallization: a Review, Materials Science & Engineering A, A238, (2), (1997), 219–74.
9. A. G. Leacock, R. J. McMurray, D. Brown, K. Poston, The Influence of Strain Rate Variations on the Appearance of Serrated Yielding in 2024-T3 Al-clad Aluminium Alloy, in Proc. 10th ESAFORM, (2007), 390-395.10.1063/1.2729545 ↗