Formability classifier for a TV back panel part with machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a machine learning-based methodology for evaluating the formability of sheet metals. An XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) machine learning classifier is developed to classify the formability of the TV back panel based on the forming limit curve (FLC). The input to the XGBoost model is the blank thickness and cross-sectional dimensions of the screw holes, AC (Alternating Current), and AV (Audio Visual) terminals on the TV back panel. The training dataset is generated using finite element simulations and verified through experimental strain measurements. The trained classification model maps the panel geometry to one of three formability classes: safe, marginal, and cracked. Strain values below the FLC are classified as safe, those within 5% margin of the FLC are classified as marginal, and those above are classified as cracked. The statistical accuracy and performance of the classifier are quantified using the confusion matrix and multiclass Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, respectively. Furthermore, in order to demonstrate the practical viability of the proposed methodology, the punch radius of the screw holes is optimized using Brent`s method in a Java environment. Remarkably, the optimization process is completed swiftly, taking only 3.11 s. Hence, the results demonstrate that formability for a new design can be improved based on the predictions of the machine learning model.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Har-Peled, S, Roth, D, Zimak, D, (2002) Constraint Classification for Multiclass Classification and Ranking. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 15: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference, MIT Press10.1007/3-540-36169-3_29 ↗
2. Breiman, L, (1996) Bias, Variance, And Arcing Classifiers. Statistics Department: University of California. Technical report 460
3. Li, P, (2010) Robust LogitBoost and Adaptive Base Class (ABC) LogitBoost. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI’10), 897–904
4. Bennett J, Lanning S (2007) The netflix prize. In Proceedings of the KDD Cup Workshop 2007:3–6
5. He, X, Pan, J, Jin, O, Xu, , Liu, B, Xu, T, Shi, Y, Atallah, A, Herbrich, R, Bowers, S, Candela JQ N, (2014) Practical lessons from predicting clicks on ads at facebook. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising, ADKDD’1410.1145/2648584.2648589 ↗
6. Choi DK (2019) Data-Driven Materials Modeling with XGBoost Algorithm and Statistical Inference Analysis for Prediction of Fatigue Strength of Steels. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 20(1):129–13810.1007/s12541-019-00048-6 ↗
7. Chheda AM, Nazro L, Sen FG, Hegadekatte V (2019) Prediction of forming limit diagrams using machine learning. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 651:01210710.1088/1757-899X/651/1/012107 ↗
8. Finamor FP, Wolff MA, Lage VS (2021) Prediction of forming limit diagrams from tensile tests of automotive grade steels by a machine learning approach. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1157:01208010.1088/1757-899X/1157/1/012080 ↗
9. Elangovan K, Narayanan CS, Narayanasamy R (2011) Modelling of forming limit diagram of perforated commercial pure aluminium sheets using artificial neural network. Comput Mater Sci 47(4):1072–107810.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.016 ↗
10. Bonatti C, Mohr D (2021) Neural network model predicting forming limits for Bi-linear strain paths. Int J Plast 137:10288610.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102886 ↗
11. Keeler, SP, (1961) Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches. MIT. Dept. of Metallurgy
12. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of Strain Analysis to Sheet Metal Forming Problems in the Press Shop. SAE Trans 77:380–387
13. Marciniak Z, Kuczyński K (1967) Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 9:609–62010.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
14. Nakazima K, Kikuma T, Hasuka K (1968) Study on the formability of steel sheets. Yawata Tech Report 264:141–154
15. Ragab AR, Baudelet B (1982) Forming limit curves: Out-of-plane and in-plane stretching. J Mech Work Technol 6(4):267–27610.1016/0378-3804(82)90027-4 ↗
16. Raghavan KS (1995) A simple technique to generate in-plane forming limit curves and selected applications. Metall Mater Trans A 26:2075–208410.1007/BF02670679 ↗
17. ASTM E2218–15, (2016) Standard Test Method for Determining Forming Limit Curves
18. Hill R (1952) On discontinuous plastic states, with special reference to localized necking in thin sheets. J Mech Phys Solid 1(1):19–3010.1016/0022-5096(52)90003-3 ↗
19. Swift HW (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. J Mech Phys Solid 1(1):1–1810.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1 ↗
20. Stören S, Rice JR (1975) Localized necking in thin sheets. J Mech Phys Solid 23(6):421–44110.1016/0022-5096(75)90004-6 ↗
21. Hutchinson, JW, Neale, KW, (1978) Sheet Necking-II. Time-Independent Behavior. In: Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming. 127–15310.1007/978-1-4613-2880-3_6 ↗
22. Brunet M, Morestin F (2001) Experimental and analytical necking studies of anisotropic sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 112(2–3):214–22610.1016/S0924-0136(01)00578-7 ↗
23. Zhang R, Shao Z, Lin J (2018) A review on modelling techniques for formability prediction of sheet metal forming. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 1(3):115–125
24. Stoughton TB, Zhu X (2004) Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD. Int J Plast 20(8–9):1463–148610.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.004 ↗
25. Stoughton TB, Yoon JW (2012) Path independent forming limits in strain and stress spaces. Int J Plast 49(25):3616–3625
26. Song WJ, Heo SC, Kim J, Kang BS (2006) Investigation on preformed shape design to improve formability in tube hydroforming process using FEM. J Mater Process Technol 177(1–3):658–66210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.084 ↗
27. Ko D-C, Cha S-H, Lee S-K, Lee C-J, Kim B-M (2010) Application of a feasible formability diagram for the effective design in stamping processes of automotive panels. Mater Des 31(3):1262–127510.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.022 ↗
28. Attanasio A, Ceretti E, Fiorentino A, Mazzoni L, Giardini C (2009) Experimental Tests to Study Feasibility and Formability in Incremental Forming Process. In Key Engineering Materials 410–411:391–40010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.391 ↗
29. Kim H-K, Kim H-W, Cho J-H, Lee J-C (2013) High-formability Al alloy sheet produced by asymmetric rolling of strip-cast sheet. Mater Sci Eng A 574:31–3610.1016/j.msea.2013.02.068 ↗
30. Zimmerling C, Dörr D, Henning F, Kärger L (2019) A machine learning assisted approach for textile formability assessment and design improvement of composite components. Compos - A: Appl 124:10545910.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.027 ↗
31. Bae MH, Kim M, Yu J, Lee MS, Lee SW, Lee T (2022) Enhanced processing map of Ti–6Al–2Sn–2Zr–2Mo–2Cr–0.15Si aided by extreme gradient boosting. Heliyon 8(10):1099110.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10991 ↗
32. Lu W, Xiao W, Li Y, Zheng K, Wu Y (2023) Machine learning in the prediction of formability in aluminum hot stamping process with multiple variable blank holder force. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 36(5):702–77110.1080/0951192X.2022.2128220 ↗
33. Marques AE, Dib MA, Khalfallah A, Soares MS, Oliveira MC, Fernandes JV, Ribeiro BM, Prates PA (2022) Machine Learning for Predicting Fracture Strain in Sheet Metal Forming. Metals 12(11):179910.3390/met12111799 ↗
34. Singh AR, Bashford-Rogers T, Marnerides D, Debattista K, Hazra S (2023) HDR image-based deep learning approach for automatic detection of split defects on sheet metal stamping parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125:2393–240810.1007/s00170-022-10763-6 ↗
35. Chen, T, Guestrin C, (2016) XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. arXiv:1603.0275410.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
36. ASTM E8/E8M-16a, (2016) Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Material. ASTM. E8/E8MQuery
37. Kuwabara T, Ikeda S, Kuroda K (1998) Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening in cold-rolled steel sheet under biaxial tension. J Mater Process Technol 80:517–52310.1016/S0924-0136(98)00155-1 ↗
38. Wu X-D, Wan M, Zhou X-B (2005) Biaxial tensile testing of cruciform specimen under complex loading. J Mater Process Technol 168–1:181–18310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.11.003 ↗
39. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi S-H, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory. Int J Plast 19:1297–131910.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
40. Ozturk, F, Dilmeç, M, Turkoz, M, Ece, RE, Halkaci, HS (2009) Grid Marking and Measurement Methods for Sheet Metal Formability. In: 5th International Conference and Exhibition on Design and Production of Machines and Dies, Molds
41. Gorodkin J (2004) Comparing two K-category assignments by a K-category correlation coefficient. Comput Biol Chem 28(5–6):367–37410.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.09.006 ↗
42. Jurman G, Riccadonna S, Furlanello C (2012) A Comparison of MCC and CEN Error Measures in Multi-Class Prediction. PLoS ONE 7(8):e4188210.1371/journal.pone.0041882 ↗
43. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay É (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12(85):2825–2830
44. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer