The free (open) boundary condition (FBC) in viscoelastic flow simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
The Free (or Open) Boundary Condition (FBC, OBC) was proposed by Papanastasiou et al. (A New Outflow Boundary Condition, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 1992; 14:587–608) to handle truncated domains with synthetic boundaries where the outflow conditions are unknown. In the present work, implementation of the FBC has been extended to viscoelastic fluids governed by explicit differential constitutive equations. As such we consider here the Criminale-Ericksen-Filbey (CEF) model, which also reduces to the Second-Order Fluid (SOF) for constant material parameters. The Finite Element Method (FEM) is used to provide numerical results in simple Poiseuille flow where analytical solutions exist for checking purposes. Then previous numerical results are checked against Newtonian highly non-isothermal flows in a 4:1 contraction. Finally, the FBC is used with the CEF fluid with data corresponding to a Boger fluid of constant material properties. Particular emphasis is based on a non-zero second normal-stress difference, which seems responsible for earlier loss of convergence. The results with the FBC are in excellent agreement with those obtained from long domains, due to the highly convective nature of viscoelastic flows, for which the FBC seems most appropriate. The FBC formulation for fixed-point (Picard-type) iterations is given in some detail, and the differences with the Newton–Raphson formulation are highlighted regarding some computational aspects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Papanastasiou TC, Malamataris N, Ellwood K (1992) A new outflow boundary condition. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 14:587–60810.1002/fld.1650140506 ↗
2. Sani RL, Gresho PM (1994) Résumé and remarks on the open boundary condition minisymposium. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 18:983–100810.1002/fld.1650181006 ↗
3. Gartling DK (1990) A test problem for outflow boundary conditions – flow over a backward-facing step. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 11:953–96710.1002/fld.1650110704 ↗
4. Leone JM Jr (1990) Open boundary condition symposium benchmark solution: stratified flow over a backward-facing step. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 11:969–98410.1002/fld.1650110705 ↗
5. Malamataris NA (1991) Computer-aided analysis of flow on moving and unbounded domains: Phase-change fronts and liquid leveling, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Michigan
6. Malamataris NT, Papanastasiou TC (1991) Unsteady free surface flows on truncated domains. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:2211–221910.1021/ie00057a025 ↗
7. Griffiths DF (1997) The ‘no boundary condition’ outflow boundary condition. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 24:393–41110.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19970228)24:4<393::AID-FLD505>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
8. Renardy M (1997) Imposing no boundary condition at outflow: why does it work? Int J Numer Meth Fluids 24:413–41710.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19970228)24:4<413::AID-FLD507>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
9. Wang MMT, Sheu TWH (1997) Implementation of a free boundary condition to Navier-Stokes equations. Int J Numer Meth Heat Fluid Flow 7:95–11110.1108/09615539710156228 ↗
10. Park SJ, Lee SJ (1999) On the use of the open boundary condition method in the numerical simulation of nonisothermal viscoelastic flow. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 87:197–21410.1016/S0377-0257(99)00064-6 ↗
11. Sunwoo KB, Park SJ, Lee SJ, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2001) Numerical simulation of three-dimensional viscoelastic flow using the open boundary condition method in coextrusion process. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 99:125–14410.1016/S0377-0257(01)00115-X ↗
12. Dimakopoulos Y, Tsamopoulos J (2004) On the gas-penetration in straight tubes completely filled with a viscoelastic fluid. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 117:117–13910.1016/j.jnnfm.2004.01.003 ↗
13. Mitsoulis E, Malamataris NA (2011) Free (open) boundary condition (FBC) revisited: some experiences with viscous flow problems. Int J Numer Meth Fluids doi: 10 1002/fld. 2608
14. Tanner RI (2000) Engineering rheology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198564737.001.0001 ↗
15. Tanner RI (1973) Die-swell reconsidered: some numerical solutions using a finite element program. Appl Polym Symp 20:201–208
16. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1977) Dynamics of polymeric liquids, Vol. 1, fluid mechanics. Wiley, New York
17. Mitsoulis E, Vlachopoulos J, Mirza FA (1985) A numerical study of the effect of normal stresses and elongational viscosity on entry vortex growth and extrudate swell. Polym Eng Sci 25:677–68910.1002/pen.760251106 ↗
18. Tanner RI (1966) Plane creeping flow of incompressible second order fluids. Phys Fluids 9:1246–124710.1063/1.1761827 ↗
19. Mitsoulis E (1990) Numerical simulation of viscoelastic fluids. In: Cheremisinoff NP (ed) Encyclopedia of fluid mechanics, Vol. 9, polymer flow engineering. Gulf Publ. Co, Dallas, pp 649–704
20. Luo X-L, Mitsoulis E (1990) An efficient algorithm for strain history tracking in finite element computations of non-Newtonian fluids with integral constitutive equations. Int J Num Meth Fluids 11:1015–103110.1002/fld.1650110708 ↗
21. Hannachi A, Mitsoulis E (1993) Sheet coextrusion of polymer solutions and melts: comparison between simulation and experiments. Adv Polym Tech 12:217–23110.1002/adv.1993.060120301 ↗
22. Huebner KM, Thornton EA (1982) The finite element method for engineers. Wiley, New York
23. Taylor C, Hughes TG (1981) Finite element programming of the navier-stokes equations. Pineridge Press, Swansea
24. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline-Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 32:199–25910.1016/0045-7825(82)90071-8 ↗
25. Mitsoulis E, Wagner R, Heng FL (1988) Numerical simulation of wire-coating low-density polyethylene: theory and experiments. Polym Eng Sci 28:291–31010.1002/pen.760280505 ↗
26. Payré G, de Broissia M, Bazinet J (1982) An ‘upwind’ finite element method via numerical integration. Int J Num Methods Eng 18:381–39610.1002/nme.1620180306 ↗
27. Barakos G, Mitsoulis E (1996) Non-isothermal viscoelastic simulations of extrusion through dies and prediction of the bending phenomenon. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 62:55–7910.1016/0377-0257(95)01385-7 ↗
28. Sun J, Phan-Thien N, Tanner RI (1996) An adaptive viscoelastic stress splitting scheme and its applications: AVSS/SI and AVSS/SUPG. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 65:75–9110.1016/0377-0257(96)01448-6 ↗
29. Luo X-L, Tanner RI (1987) A pseudo-time integral method for non-isothermal viscoelastic flows and its application to extrusion simulation. Rheol Acta 26:499–50710.1007/BF01333733 ↗
30. Meissner J (1975) Basic parameters, melt rheology, processing and end-use properties of three similar low density polyethylene samples. Pure Appl Chem 42:551–61210.1351/pac197542040551 ↗
31. Nguyen H, Boger DV (1979) The kinematics and stability of die entry flows. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 5:353–36810.1016/0377-0257(79)85023-5 ↗
32. Mitsoulis E (1986) The numerical simulation of Boger fluids: a viscometric approximation approach. Polym Eng Sci 26:1552–156210.1002/pen.760262205 ↗
33. Papanastasiou AC, Scriven LE, Macosco CW (1983) An integral constitutive equation for mixed flows: viscoelastic characterization. J Rheol 27:387–41010.1122/1.549712 ↗
34. Luo X-L, Tanner RI (1988) Finite element simulation of long and short circular die extrusion experiments using integral models. Int J Num Meth Eng 25:9–2210.1002/nme.1620250104 ↗
35. Mitsoulis E (2001) Numerical simulation of entry flow of the IUPAC-LDPE melt. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 97:13–3010.1016/S0377-0257(00)00183-X ↗