journal article·2011-09

Local bifurcation and instability theory applied to formability analysis

Marta C. Oliveira, José L. Alves, Luís F. Menezes, Koichi Ito, Naomichi Mori

Publisher page

Abstract

The design and optimization of both sheet metal formed parts and processes are nowadays carried out virtually making use of numerical tools by finite element analysis. Such virtual try-out approach contributes with significant savings in terms of money, time and effort in the design, production and process set-up of deep drawn parts. The analysis of either forming success operation or surface defects, in each of the development phases, is generally performed by means of the material’s forming limit diagram (FLD), since it allows to define a safe region that reduces the probability of: (i) necking; (ii) wrinkling and (iii) large deformation occurrence. However, the FLD represented in the strain space is known to present some disadvantages. To overcome this problem, Ito and Goya proposed a local bifurcation criterion that defines the critical state for a local bifurcation to set in as a function of the stress level to work-hardening rate ratio, leading to a FLD represented in the stress space. This suggests that the FLD obtained is completely objective in the sense that it is completely independent of the strain or stress history paths (Ito et al. 2000). In this work the Ito and Goya model is used to evaluate formability, as well as fracture mode and direction on the deep drawing of a square cup. Since the analysis is performed based on the stress state, it is also possible to determine an instability factor that “measures” the degree of acceleration by current stress for the local bifurcation mode towards fracture. The selected example highlights the potential use of the criterion which, once combined with the finite element analysis, can undeniably improve the mechanical design of forming processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Ito K, Satoh K, Goya M, Tohru Y (2000) Prediction of limit strain in sheet metal-forming processes by 3D analysis of localized necking. Int J Mech Sci 42:2233–2248. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00004-710.1016/S0020-7403(00)00004-7 ↗
2. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K, Pokora T (1973) Influence of the plastic properties of a material on the forming limit diagram for sheet metal in tension. Int J Mech Sci 15:789–805. doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(73)90068-410.1016/0020-7403(73)90068-4 ↗
3. Stoughton TB (2000) A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 42:1–27. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00113-110.1016/S0020-7403(98)00113-1 ↗
4. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T (2007) Effect of strain hardening behavior on forming limit stresses of steel tube subjected to nonproportional loading paths. Int J Plasticity 23:1260–1284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2006.11.008 ↗
5. Uthaisangsuk V, Prahl U, Münstermann S, Bleck W (2008) Experimental and numerical failure criterion for formability prediction in sheet metal forming. Comp Mater Sci 43:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.03610.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.036 ↗
6. Assempour A, Hashemi R, Abrinia K, Ganjiani M, Masoumi E (2009) A methodology for prediction of forming limit stress diagrams considering the strain path effect. Comp Mater Sci 45:195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.02510.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.025 ↗
7. Stören S, Rice JR (1975) Localized necking in thin sheets. J Mech Phys Solids 23:421–441. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(75)90004-610.1016/0022-5096(75)90004-6 ↗
8. Hill R (1959) Some basic principles in the mechanics of solids without a natural time. J Mech Phys Solids 7:209–225. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(59)90007-910.1016/0022-5096(59)90007-9 ↗
9. Menezes LF, Teodosiu C (2000) Three-dimensional numerical simulation of the deep-drawing process using solid finite element. J Mater Process Tech 97:100–106. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00345-310.1016/S0924-0136(99)00345-3 ↗
10. Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2008) Algorithms and strategies for treatment of large deformation frictional contact in the numerical simulation of deep drawing process. Arch Comput Method E 15:113–162. doi: 10.1007/s11831-008-9018-x10.1007/s11831-008-9018-x ↗
11. NXT, Defect Evaluator, M&M Research, Inc; http://www.m-research.co.jp
12. Nishimura R, Ito K, Nakazawa Y, Uemura G, Mori N (2007) Evaluation of forming limit by the 3 dimensional local bifurcation theory. In: César de Sá JMA, Santos AD (ed.) NUMIFORM’07, The 9th International Conference in Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 1433 –143810.1063/1.2741010 ↗
13. Li KP, Carden WP, Wagoner RH (2002) Simulation of springback. Int J Mech Sci 44:103–122. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00083-210.1016/S0020-7403(01)00083-2 ↗
14. Padmanabhan R, Oliveira MC, Baptista AJ, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2007) Study on the influence of the refinement of a 3-D finite element mesh in springback evaluation of plane-strain channel sections, In: César de Sá JMA, Santos AD (ed.) NUMIFORM’07, The 9th International Conference in Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 847 –852
15. Baptista AJ, Alves JL, Rodrigues DM, Menezes LF (2006) Trimming of 3D solid finite element meshes using parametric surfaces: Application to sheet metal forming. Finite Elem Anal Des 42:1053–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2006.03.00510.1016/j.finel.2006.03.005 ↗
16. Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF, Ito K, Uemura G, Mori N (2008) Formability analysis by the local bifurcation and instability theory. In: Hora P (ed) NUMISHEET’08, 7th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes —Part A. Institute of Virtual Manufacturing, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 211–216