journal article·2009-08

A Pareto optimal design approach for simultaneous control of thinning and springback in stamping processes

Rosa Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe Ingarao, Fabrizio Micari, Francisco Chinesta

Publisher page

Abstract

One of the most relevant research issues in automotive field is focused on the reduction of stamped parts weight also increasing their strength. In this way, a strong research effort is developed on high strength steels which are widely utilized and they require a proper springback control. Springback reduction in sheet metal forming is a typical goal to be pursued which is conflicting with thinning reduction for instance. Thus, such problems can be considered as multi-objective ones characterized by conflicting objectives. What is more, nowadays, a great interest would be focused on the availability of a cluster of possible optimal solutions instead of a single one, particularly in an industrial environment. In this paper, integration between numerical simulations, response surface methodology and Pareto optimal solutions search techniques was applied in order to design a DP 600 U-channel shape stamping operation. In particular the friction conditions and blank holder force were optimized as design variables in order to accomplish two different objectives: reduce excessive thinning and avoid excessive geometrical distortions due to springback occurrence.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Banu M, Takamura M, Hama T, Naidim O, Teodosiu C, Makinouchi A (2006) Simulation of springback and wrinkling in stamping of dual phase steel rail-shaped part. J. Mater. Process. Technol 173:178–18410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.023 ↗
2. Koc M, Chen P (2007) Simulation of springback variation in forming of advanced high strength steels. J. Mater. Process. Technol 190:189–19810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.046 ↗
3. Asgari M, Pereira BF, Rolfe M, Dingle PD, Hodgson SA (2008) Statistical analysis of finite element modeling in sheet metal forming and springback analysis. J. Mater. Process. Technol 203:129–13610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.073 ↗
4. Xu WL, Ma CH, Li CH, Feng WJ (2004) Sensitive factors in springback simulation for sheet metal forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol 151:217–22210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.044 ↗
5. Fratini L, Ingarao G, Micari F (2008) On the springback prediction in 3d sheet metal forming processes. Steel Research International.
6. Faust A, Roll K (2008) Numerical springback evaluation for modern high strength steels using advanced material models. Proceeding of VII Numisheet Conference, pages 503–507
7. Mangas A, Arroyo A, Fernandes I, Gonzalez B (2006) Improvement of springback FEM simulation by means of an optimization procedure based on an experimental trial. Proceedings of IDDRG Conference, pages 153–160.
8. Messac A, Mullur AA (2008) A computationally efficient metamodeling approach for expensive multiobjective optimization. Optimisation Engineering 9:37–6710.1007/s11081-007-9008-0 ↗
9. Marler TR, Chang-Hwan K, Arora JS (2006) System identification of simplified crash models using multi-objective optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg 195:4383–439510.1016/j.cma.2005.09.002 ↗
10. Firat M (2007) U-channel forming analysis with an emphasis on springback deformation. Mater Des 28:147–15410.1016/j.matdes.2005.05.008 ↗
11. Papeleux L, Ponthot JP (2002) Finite element simulation of springback in sheet metal forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol 125–126:785–79110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00393-X ↗
12. Barlat F, Lian FJ (1989) Plastic behaviour and stretchability of sheet metal Part1. A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int. J. Plast. 5:51–6610.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
13. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA