The effects of pressure control technique on hot gas blow forming of Mg AZ31 sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
The forming pressure-time schedule is critically important in high temperature gas blow forming of sheet materials. Forming pressure controls the strain rate that influences necking and thickness distribution uniformity in the formed component. In this work, the effects of forming pressure control technique; constant pressure versus constant strain rate, on the superplastic forming of Mg AZ31-H24 sheets at 400 °C are investigated. Experiments and detailed finite element simulations that incorporate a phenomenological microstructure based constitutive model for forming a cylindrical cup are conducted. Sheet thickness distribution across the formed part and the deformation progress are examined in details. The results clearly reveal that for the same forming time required to fully form the cup, the constant forming pressure control technique acts as a variable strain rate forming procedure that yields to a more uniform thickness distribution when compared to the constant strain rate control technique. However, it should be noted that the initial strain rates for forming at constant pressure are of extreme importance as high initial strain rates that exceed 10−2 s−1 might cause rupture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Kulekci M (2008) Magnesium and its alloys applications in automotive industry. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 39:851–86510.1007/s00170-007-1279-2 ↗
2. SAE AS8049 Revision C (2015) Performance standard for seats in civil rotorcraft, transport aircraft, and general aviation aircraft. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/as8049c/
3. Gneiger S, Papenberg N, Frank S, Gradinger R (2018) Investigations on microstructure and mechanical properties of non-flammable Mg–Al–Zn–Ca–Y Alloys. In: Orlov D, Joshi V, Solanki K, Neelameggham N (eds) Magnesium Technology 2018. TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-72332-7_17 ↗
4. Abu-Farha F, Khraisheh M (2007) Analysis of superplastic deformation of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Adv Eng Mater 9:777–78310.1002/adem.200700155 ↗
5. Panickera R, Chokshia A, Mishrab R, Vermab R, KrajewskI P (2009) Microstructural evolution and grain boundary sliding in a superplastic magnesium AZ31 alloy. Acta Mater 57:3683–369310.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.011 ↗
6. Taleff E, Hector L, Bradley J, Verma R, Krajewski P (2010) Local thinning at a die entry radius during hot gas-pressure forming of an AA5083 sheet. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME 132:011016.1–011016.710.1115/1.4000884 ↗
7. Verma R, Hector L, Krajewski P, Taleff E (2009) The finite element simulation of high-temperature magnesium AZ31 sheet forming. J Min Met Mat S 61:29–3710.1007/s11837-009-0118-3 ↗
8. Min K, Lee H (2015) Integrated Manufacturing of Aerospace Components by Superplastic Forming Technology MATEC Web of Conferences 3010.1051/matecconf/20153002003 ↗
9. Aksenov S, Chumachenko E, Kolesnikov A, Osipov S (2015) Determination of optimal gas forming conditions from free bulging tests at constant pressure. J Mater Process Tech 217:158–16410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.015 ↗
10. Sorgente D, Tricarico L (2014) Characterization of a superplastic aluminium alloy ALNOVI-U through free inflation tests and inverse analysis. Int J Mater Form 7:179–18710.1007/s12289-012-1118-3 ↗
11. Giuliano G, Franchitti S (2008) The determination of material parameters from superplastic free-bulging tests at constant pressure. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48:1519–152210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.05.007 ↗
12. Sorgente D, Campanellib S, Stecchib A, Contuzzib N (2016) Strain behaviour of a friction stir processed superplastic aluminium alloy sheet during free inflation tests. J Manuf Process 23:287–29510.1016/j.jmapro.2016.04.007 ↗
13. Mitukiewicz G, Anantheshwara K, Zhou G, Mishra R, Jain M (2014) A new method of determining forming limit diagram for sheet materials by gas blow forming. J Mater Process Tech 214:2960–297010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.020 ↗
14. Kudo T, Goto A, Saito K (2013) High strain rate blow formability of newly developed Al-Mg-high-Mn alloy. Mater Sci Forum 735:271–27710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.735.271 ↗
15. Albakri M, Abu-Farha F, Khraisheh M (2013) A new combined experimental–numerical approach to evaluate formability of rate dependent materials. Int J Mech Sci 66:55–6610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.10.008 ↗
16. Dutta A, Mukherjee A (1992) Superplastic forming: an analytical approach. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 157:9–1310.1016/0921-5093(92)90092-F ↗
17. Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa D (2001) Closed-form solution for bulging through elliptical dies. J Mater Process Tech 115:83–8610.1016/S0924-0136(01)00773-7 ↗
18. Jarrar F, Hector L, Khraisheh M, Bower A (2010) New approach to gas pressure profile prediction for high temperature AA5083 sheet forming. J Mater Process Tech 210:825–83410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.002 ↗
19. Nazzal M, Khraisheh M (2008) Impact of selective grain refinement on superplastic deformation: finite element analysis. J Mater Eng Perform 17:163–16710.1007/s11665-007-9180-6 ↗
20. Jarrar F, Liewald M, Schmid P, Fortanier A (2014) Superplastic forming of triangular channels with sharp radii. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1313–132010.1007/s11665-014-0878-y ↗
21. Nazzal M, Khraisheh M (2007) The effects of stress state and cavitation on deformation stability during superplastic forming. J Mater Eng Perform 16:200–20710.1007/s11665-007-9032-4 ↗
22. Khraisheh M, Zbib H, Hamilton C, Bayoumi A (1997) Constitutive modeling of superplastic deformation. Part I: theory and experiments. Int J Plasticity 13:143–16410.1016/S0749-6419(97)00005-3 ↗
23. Nazzal M, Khraisheh M (2007) Finite element modeling of superplastic forming in the presence of back pressure. Material Science Forum 551-552:257–26210.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.551-552.257 ↗
24. Hamilton C, Zbib H, Johnson C, Richter S (1991) Dynamic grain coarsening, its effect on flow localization in superplastic deformation. The Second International SAMPE Symposium, Chipa, Japan 272–279
25. Thuramalla N, Khraisheh M (2004) Multiscale–based optimization of superplastic forming. Trans NAMRI/SMEJ 32:637–643
26. Caceres C, Wilkinson D (1984) Large strain behavior of a superplastic copper alloy - deformation. Acta Metall 32:415–42210.1016/0001-6160(84)90115-9 ↗
27. Krajewski P, Schroth J (2007) Tribological testing of graphite and boron nitride lubricant formulations for high temperature aluminum sheet forming processes. In: Proceedings of the STLE/ASME International Joint Tribology Conference IJTC2007–4404, October 22–24, San Diego, CA
28. Abaqus/Standard Users Manual 6.14 (2014) Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA
29. Alabort E, Putman D, Reed RC (2015) Superplasticity in Ti–6Al–4V: characterisation, modelling and applications. Acta Mater 95:428–44210.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.056 ↗
30. Lin J (2003) Selection of material models for predicting necking in superplastic forming. Int J Plasticity 19:469–48110.1016/S0749-6419(01)00059-6 ↗
31. Hambli R, Potiron A, Guerin F, Dumon B (2001) Numerical pressure prediction algorithm of superplastic forming processes using 2D and 3D models. J Mater Process Tech 112:83–9010.1016/S0924-0136(01)00549-0 ↗
32. Montgomery D, Runger G (2014) Applied statistics and probability for engineers, 6th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 383–418