journal article·2016-07Open access

Mechanical property of magnesium alloy sheet with hardening deterioration at warm temperatures and its application for failure analysis: Part I - property characterization

Wooram Noh, Youngwoo Koh, Dong-Yoon Seok, R. H. Wagoner, Frédéric Barlat, Kwansoo Chung

Abstract

The mechanical property of a thin AZ31B Mg alloy sheet (with the thickness of 0.5 mm) was characterized for its anisotropy, temperature-dependent hardening (including its deterioration) and strain rate sensitivity based on simple tension test data measured at 100 °C, 150 °C, 200 °C, 250 °C, respectively, in Part I. As for anisotropy, simple tension tests were performed along three (rolling, transverse and in-between) directions to calibrate the Hill1948 yield function. As for temperature-dependent hardening, the common practice is to characterize hardening only up to the uniform elongation limit and to extrapolate the data to cover the range beyond its limit. In this work, hardening as well as its deterioration (or softening) behavior observed beyond the uniform elongation limit was numerically characterized based on the inverse calibration method, in which strain rate sensitivity was also considered. The mechanical properties were confirmed to properly predict failure by strain localization for all the simple tension tests involved in the characterization procedure. Ultimately, the mechanical properties characterized in Part I were applied in Part II to analyze the failure by strain localization in the cross-shaped cup drawing tests developed as the benchmark problem for the NUMISHEET2011 conference [1].
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim H, Kim HY (2011) Benchmark 2: Simulation of the Cross-shaped Cup Deep-drawing Process. In: Huh, H., Chung, K., Han, S.S., Chung, W.J. (Ed.). The NUMISHEET 2011 Benchmark Study of the 8th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Korea
2. Chen F-K, Huang T-B (2003) Formability of stamping magnesium-alloy AZ31 sheets. J Mater Process Technol 142(3):643–647. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00684-810.1016/S0924-0136(03)00684-8 ↗
3. Lou X, Li M, Boger R, Agnew S, Wagoner R (2007) Hardening evolution of AZ31B Mg sheet. Int J Plast 23(1):44–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.005 ↗
4. Doege E, Dröder K (2001) Sheet metal forming of magnesium wrought alloys — formability and process technology. J Mater Process Technol 115(1):14–19. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00760-910.1016/S0924-0136(01)00760-9 ↗
5. Lee S, Chen Y-H, Wang J-Y (2002) Isothermal sheet formability of magnesium alloy AZ31 and AZ61. J Mater Process Technol 124(1–2):19–24. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00038-910.1016/S0924-0136(02)00038-9 ↗
6. Romhanji E, Dudukovska M, Glišić D (2002) The effect of temperature on strain-rate sensitivity in high strength Al–Mg alloy sheet. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:193–198. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00308-410.1016/S0924-0136(02)00308-4 ↗
7. Ulacia I, Salisbury CP, Hurtado I, Worswick MJ (2011) Tensile characterization and constitutive modeling of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheet over wide range of strain rates and temperatures. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):830–839. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.01010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.010 ↗
8. Piao K, Chung K, Lee M-G, Wagoner RH (2012) Twinning-slip transitions in Mg AZ31B. Metall Mater Trans A 43(9):3300–3313. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1154-010.1007/s11661-012-1154-0 ↗
9. Nguyen N-T, Seo OS, Lee CA, Lee M-G, Kim J-H, Kim HY (2014) Mechanical behavior of AZ31B Mg alloy sheets under monotonic and cyclic loadings at room and moderately elevated temperatures. Materials 7(2):1271–129510.3390/ma7021271 ↗
10. Kim J, Ryou H, Kim D, Kim D, Lee W, Hong S-H, Chung K (2008) Constitutive law for AZ31B Mg alloy sheets and finite element simulation for three-point bending. Int J Mech Sci 50(10–11):1510–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.08.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.08.004 ↗
11. Kim JH, Kim D, Lee Y-S, Lee M-G, Chung K, Kim H-Y, Wagoner RH (2013) A temperature-dependent elasto-plastic constitutive model for magnesium alloy AZ31 sheets. Int J Plast 50:66–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.04.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2013.04.001 ↗
12. Lee MG, Kim SJ, Wagoner RH, Chung K, Kim HY (2009) Constitutive modeling for anisotropic/asymmetric hardening behavior of magnesium alloy sheets: Application to sheet springback. Int J Plast 25(1):70–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.12.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2007.12.003 ↗
13. Lee M-G, Wagoner RH, Lee JK, Chung K, Kim HY (2008) Constitutive modeling for anisotropic/asymmetric hardening behavior of magnesium alloy sheets. Int J Plast 24(4):545–582. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.05.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.05.004 ↗
14. Li L, Zhou J, Duszczyk J (2006) Determination of a constitutive relationship for AZ31B magnesium alloy and validation through comparison between simulated and real extrusion. J Mater Process Technol 172(3):372–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.021 ↗
15. Al-Samman T, Gottstein G (2008) Dynamic recrystallization during high temperature deformation of magnesium. Mater Sci Eng A 490(1–2):411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.00410.1016/j.msea.2008.02.004 ↗
16. Koike J, Ohyama R, Kobayashi T, Suzuki M, Maruyama K (2003) Grain-boundary sliding in AZ31 magnesium alloys at room temperature to 523 K. Mater Trans 44(4):445–45110.2320/matertrans.44.445 ↗
17. Vagarali SS, Langdon TG (1981) Deformation mechanisms in h.c.p. metals at elevated temperatures—I. Creep behavior of magnesium. Acta Metall 29(12):1969–1982. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(81)90034-110.1016/0001-6160(81)90034-1 ↗
18. Chung K, Kim H, Lee C (2014) Forming limit criterion for ductile anisotropic sheets as a material property and its deformation path insensitivity. Part I: Deformation path insensitive formula based on theoretical models. Int J Plast 58:3–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.009 ↗
19. Chung K, Lee C, Kim H (2014) Forming limit criterion for ductile anisotropic sheets as a material property and its deformation path insensitivity, Part II: Boundary value problems. Int J Plast 58:35–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.01410.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.014 ↗
20. Chung K, Ma N, Park T, Kim D, Yoo D, Kim C (2011) A modified damage model for advanced high strength steel sheets. Int J Plast 27(10):1485–1511. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.007 ↗
21. Ma N, Park T, Kim D, Kim C, Chung K (2010) Numerical and experimental evaluation of the impact performance of advanced high-strength steel sheets based on a damage model. Met Mater Int 16(3):427–43910.1007/s12540-010-0613-7 ↗
22. Seok D-Y, Kim D, Kim S-W, Bak J, Lee Y-S, Chung K (2014) Fracture Criterion for AZ31 Mg Alloy Plate at Elevated Temperature. Metals and Materials International (Accepted)10.1007/s12540-015-1007-7 ↗
23. Kim S-W, Lee Y-S (2013) Comparative Study on Failure Prediction in Warm Forming Processes of Mg Alloy Sheet by the FEM and Ductile Fracture Criteria. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B:1–9
24. Lee BH, Reddy NS, Yeom JT, Lee CS (2007) Flow softening behavior during high temperature deformation of AZ31Mg alloy. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:766–769. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.05310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.053 ↗
25. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lon Ser A Math Phys Sci 193(1033):281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
26. ABAQUS (2010) (User’s Manual (Version 610), Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc, USA