journal article·2021-09Open access

Development of a numerical compensation framework for geometrical deviations in bulk metal forming exploiting a surrogate model and computed compatible stresses

Lorenzo Scandola, Christoph Büdenbender, Michael Till, Daniel Maier, Michael Ott, Bernd-Arno Behrens, Wolfram Volk

Abstract

Abstract The optimal design of the tools in bulk metal forming is a crucial task in the early design phase and greatly affects the final accuracy of the parts. The process of tool geometry assessment is resource- and time-consuming, as it consists of experience-based procedures. In this paper, a compensation method is developed with the aim to reduce geometrical deviations in hot forged parts. In order to simplify the transition process between the discrete finite-element (FE) mesh and the computer-aided-design (CAD) geometry, a strategy featuring an equivalent surrogate model is proposed. The deviations are evaluated on a reduced set of reference points on the nominal geometry and transferred to the FE nodes. The compensation approach represents a modification of the displacement-compatible spring-forward method (DC-SF), which consists of two elastic FE analyses. The compatible stress originating the deviations is estimated and subsequently applied to the original nominal geometry. After stress relaxation, an updated nominal geometry of the part is obtained, whose surfaces represent the compensated tools. The compensation method is verified by means of finite element simulations and the robustness of the algorithm is demonstrated with an additional test geometry. Finally, the compensation strategy is validated experimentally.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Behrens B-A, Odening D (2009) Process and tool design for precision forging of geared components. Int J Mater Form 2 (SUPPL. 1):125–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0577-7. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84856033223&doi=10.10072fs12289-009-0577-7&partnerID=40&md5=319ba51346d09d531833ce4bcd77dc5e10.1007/s12289-009-0577-7 ↗
2. Balendra R (2001) Nett-shape forming: state-of-the-art. J Mater Process Tech 115(2):172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00812-310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00812-3 ↗
3. Geng L, Wagoner RH (2002) Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback. Int J Mech Sci 44(1):123–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00085-610.1016/S0020-7403(01)00085-6 ↗
4. Maier D, Hartmann C, Till M, Büdenbender C, Behrens B-A, Volk W (2019) Data-driven compensation for bulk formed parts based on material point tracking. Key Eng Mat 794:277–284. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.794.27710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.794.277 ↗
5. Lee S, Eder M, Maier D, Volk W (2019) Stress-based compensation of geometrical deviations in metal forming. In: Schmitt R, Schuh G (eds) Advances in production research, vol 203, pp 647–656. Springer International Publishing. Cham10.1007/978-3-030-03451-1_63 ↗
6. Hartmann C, Eder M, Opritescu D, Maier D, Santaella M, Volk W (2018) Geometrical compensation of deterministic deviations for part finishing in bulk forming. J Mater Process Tech 261:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.06.00810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.06.008 ↗
7. Li KP, Carden WP, Wagoner RH (2002) Simulation of springback. Int J Mech Sci 44(1):103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00083-210.1016/S0020-7403(01)00083-2 ↗
8. Carden WD, Geng LM, Matlock DK, Wagoner RH (2002) Measurement of springback. Int J Mech Sci 44(1):79–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00082-010.1016/S0020-7403(01)00082-0 ↗
9. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1992) Tooling design accomodating springback errors. J Mater Process Tech 32(1-2):499–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(92)90206-810.1016/0924-0136(92)90206-8 ↗
10. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1992) Tooling design in sheet metal forming using springback calculations. Int J Mech Sci 34(2):113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(92)90077-T10.1016/0020-7403(92)90077-T ↗
11. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1996) Tooling and binder design for sheet metal forming processes compensating springback error. J Phys Conf Ser 36(4):503–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(95)00023-210.1016/0890-6955(95)00023-2 ↗
12. Wu L (1997) Tooling mesh generation technique for iterative FEM die surface design algorithm to compensate for springback in sheetmetal stamping. Eng Computations 14(6):630–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/0264440971018049110.1108/02644409710180491 ↗
13. Wu L (1996) Generate tooling mesh by FEM virtual forming model for springback compensation in die surface design of sheet metal stamping. SAE Trans 105:643–649
14. Gan W, Wagoner RH (2004) Die design method for sheet springback. Int J Mech Sci 46(7):1097–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.006 ↗
15. Lingbeek RA, Gan W, Wagoner RH, Meinders T, Weiher J (2008) Theoretical verification of the displacement adjustment and springforward algorithms for springback compensation. Int J Mater Form 1(3):159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0369-510.1007/s12289-008-0369-5 ↗
16. Birkert A, Hartmann B, Straub M (2017) New method for springback compensation for the stamping of sheet metal components. J Phys Conf Ser 896:012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/896/1/01206710.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012067 ↗
17. Hiramoto J, Urabe M, Ishiwatari A, Yoshida F (2016) Simple springback cause analysis using measured shapes of dies and pressed part. Key Eng Mat 725:683–688. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.725.68310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.725.683 ↗
18. Fourment L, Chenot JL (1996) Optimal design for non-steady-state metal forming processes—i. shape optimization method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(1):33–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960115)39:1<33::AID-NME844>3.0.CO;2-Z, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0207%281%9960115%2939%3A1%3C33%3A%3AAID-NME844%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960115)39:1<33::AID-NME844>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
19. Vieilledent D, Fourment L (2001) Shape optimization of axisymmetric preform tools in forging using a direct differentiation method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52(11):1301–1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.25610.1002/nme.256 ↗
20. Rodic̆ T, Gres̆ovnik I (1998) A computer system for solving inverse and optimization problems. Eng Comput 15:893–907. https://doi.org/10.1108/0264440981023690210.1108/02644409810236902 ↗
21. Ghouati O, Lenoir H, Gelin JC (2000) Optimal design of forming processes using the finite element method. Adv Eng Mater 2(7):438–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/1527-2648(200007)2:7<438::AID-ADEM438>3.0.CO;2-I, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1527-2648%28200007%292%3A7%3C438%3A%3AAID-ADEM438%3E3.0.CO%3B2-I10.1002/1527-2648(200007)2:7<438::AID-ADEM438>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
22. Ou H, Armstrong CG (2002) Die shape compensation in hot forging of titanium aerofoil sections. J Mater Process Tech 125-126:347–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00297-210.1016/S0924-0136(02)00297-2 ↗
23. Lu B, Ou H, Armstrong CG, Rennie A (2009) 3d die shape optimisation for net-shape forging of aerofoil blades. Materials & Design 30(7):2490–2500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.00710.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.007 ↗
24. Landkammer P (2018) Inverse fomfindungsverfahren zur anwendung in der umformtechnik. Ph.D. Thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
25. Landkammer P, Caspari M, Steinmann P (2018) Improvements on a non-invasive, parameter-free approach to inverse form finding. Comput Mech 61(4):433–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1468-210.1007/s00466-017-1468-2 ↗
26. Caspari M, Landkammer P, Steinmann P (2018) A non-invasive node-based form finding approach with discretization-independent target configuration. Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences 5(1):725. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-018-0104-910.1186/s40323-018-0104-9 ↗
27. Hartmann C, Eder M, Opritescu D, Volk W (2017) Process-integrated compensation of geometrical deviations for bulk forming. Procedia Eng 207:466–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.80610.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.806 ↗
28. Hartmann C, Opritescu D, Volk W (2019) An artificial neural network approach for tool path generation in incremental sheet metal free-forming. J Intell Manuf 30(2):757–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1279-x10.1007/s10845-016-1279-x ↗
29. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ, Taylor RL (2013) The finite element method: Its basis and fundamentals, 7th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK
30. Dassault Systemes (2013) Abaqus 6.13 documentation. Dassault Systemes, Vélizy-Villacoublay. http://dsk.ippt.pan.pl/docs/abaqus/v6.13/index.html
31. van Rossum G, Drake FL (2009) Python 3 reference manual. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA. https://www.python.org/
32. Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The nurbs book. Monographs in visual communication, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg
33. Bingol OR, Krishnamurthy A (2019) Nurbs-python: An open-source object-oriented nurbs modeling framework in python. SoftwareX 9:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2018.12.00510.1016/j.softx.2018.12.005 ↗
34. Dassault Systemes (2009) Catia v5 documentation. Dassault Systemes, Vélizy-Villacoublay. http://catiadoc.free.fr/online/CATIA_P3_default.htm
35. Behrens B-A, Volk W, Maier D, Scandola L, Ott M, Büdenbender C, Till M (2020) A combined numerical and experimental investigation on deterministic deviations in hot forging processes. Procedia Manufacturing 47:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.231. 23rd International Conference on Material Forming10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.231 ↗
36. Herbertz R (2013) Massivumformung kurz und bündig, 1Aufl. Industrieverband Massivumformung e.V, Hagen