On the use of effective limit strains to evaluate the forming severity of sheet metal parts after nonlinear loading
Source abstract
Abstract
The conventional forming limit curve (FLC) is significantly strain path-dependent and therefore is not valid for formability evaluation of sheet metal parts that undergo nonlinear loading paths during the forming process. The stress-based forming limit curve (SFLC) is path-independent for all but very large prestrains and is a promising tool for formability evaluation. The SFLC is an ideal failure criterion for virtual forming simulations but it cannot be easily used on the shop floor as there is no straightforward experimental method to measure stresses in stamped parts. This paper presents a theoretical basis for predicting the effective limit strain curve (ELSC) using the Marciniak and Kuczynski (MK) analysis (Int J Mech Sci 9:609–620, 1967, Int J Mech Sci 15:789–805, 1973). Since the in-plane strain components are sufficient to calculate the effective strain, the ELSC can easily be determined from strains measured in the stamping plant, and therefore it is a better alternative to the SFLC for formability evaluation. This model was validated using experimental data for AISI-1012 steel (Molaei 1999) and AA-2008-T4 aluminum alloys Graf and Hosford (Metall Trans 24A:2503–2512, 1993). Predicted results showed that, similar to SFLC, the ELSC remains practically unchanged for a significant range of prestrain values under various bilinear loading paths, but some strain-path dependence can be observed for significant magnitudes of the effective prestrain (ee ≥ 0.37 for AISI-1012 steel and ee ≥ 0.25 for AA-2008-T4 aluminum).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Arrieux R, Bedrin C, Boivin M (1982) Determination of an intrinsic forming limit stress diagram for isotropic sheets. Proceedings of the 12th IDDRG Congress 2: 61–71
2. Barata DRA, Barlat F, Jalinier JM (1985) Prediction of the forming limit diagrams of anisotropic sheets in linear and nonlinear loading. Mater Sci Eng 68:151–16410.1016/0025-5416(85)90404-5 ↗
3. Butuc MC, Gracio JJ, da Barata RA (2006) An experimental and theoretical analysis on the application of stress-based forming limit criterion. Int J Mech Sci 48:414–42910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.11.007 ↗
4. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming in the press shop. SAE technical paper 68009310.4271/680093 ↗
5. Graf A, Hosford W (1993) Effect of changing strain paths on forming limit diagrams of Al 2008-T4. Metall Trans 24A:2503–251210.1007/BF02646529 ↗
6. Green DE (2008) Formability Analysis for Tubular Hydroformed Parts. In: M. Koç (ed) Hydroforming for Advanced Manufacturing. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, p 93–12010.1533/9781845694418.1.93 ↗
7. Gronostajski I (1984) Sheet metal forming limits for complex strain paths. J Mech Work Technol 10:349–36210.1016/0378-3804(84)90048-2 ↗
8. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A 193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
9. Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University press
10. Hill R (1952) On discontinuous plastic states, with special reference to localized necking in thin sheets. J Mech Phys Solids 1:19–3010.1016/0022-5096(52)90003-3 ↗
11. Hosford WF (1979) On yield loci of anisotropic cubic metals, Proceedings of the 7th North American Metalworking Conference (NMRC), SME. Dearborn, MI, pp 191–197
12. Hutchinson JW, Neale KW (1978) Sheet necking-III. Strain-rate effects. In: Koistinen DP, Wang NM (eds) Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming. Plenum, New York, pp 269–28310.1007/978-1-4613-2880-3_11 ↗
13. Keeler SP, Backhofen WA (1964) Plastic instability and fracture in sheet stretched over rigid punches. ASM Trans Quart 56:25–48
14. Kleemola HJ, Pelkkikangas MT (1977) Effect of pre-deformation and strain path on the forming limits of steel, copper and brass. Sheet Metal Ind 63:559–591
15. Kuwabara T, Yoshida K, Narihara K, Takahashi S (2005) Anisotropic plastic deformation of extruded aluminum alloy tube under axial forces and internal pressure. Int J Plast 21:101–11710.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.006 ↗
16. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K (1967) Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 9:609–62010.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
17. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K, Pokora T (1973) Influence of the plastic properties of a material on the forming limit diagram for sheet metal in tension. Int J Mech Sci 15:789–80510.1016/0020-7403(73)90068-4 ↗
18. Mises R (1913) Mechanics of solids in plastic state. Göttinger Nachrichten Math Phys Klasse 1:582–592 (In German)
19. Molaei B (1999) Strain path effects on sheet metal formability, Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran (PhD thesis)
20. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2011a) Investigation on the strain-path dependency of stress-based forming limit curves. Int J Mater Form 4:25–3710.1007/s12289-010-0989-4 ↗
21. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2011b) Prediction of sheet forming limits with Marciniak and Kuczynski analysis using combined isotropic-nonlinear kinematic hardening. Int J Mech Sci 53:145–15310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.12.004 ↗
22. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2011c) Influence of out-of-plane compression stress on limit strains in sheet metals, Int J Mater Form, in press10.1007/s12289-011-1044-9 ↗
23. Stachowicz F (1988) Effect of annealing temperature on plastic flow properties and forming limits diagrams of Titanium and Titanium alloy sheets. Trans Jpn Inst Metals 29:484–49310.2320/matertrans1960.29.484 ↗
24. Stoughton TB (2000) A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 42:1–2710.1016/S0020-7403(98)00113-1 ↗
25. Stoughton TB (2001) Stress-based forming limits in sheet metal forming. J Eng Mater Technol ASME 123:417–42210.1115/1.1398083 ↗
26. Stoughton TB, Zhu X (2004) Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD. Int J Plast 20:1463–148610.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.004 ↗
27. Stoughton TB, Yoon JW (2005) Sheet metal formability analysis for anisotropic materials under non-proportional loading. Int J Mech Sci 47:1972–200210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.005 ↗
28. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Narihara K, Takahashi S (2005) Experimental verification of the path dependence of forming limit stresses. Int J Form Process 8:283–298
29. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Kuroda M (2007) Path-dependence of the forming limit stresses in a sheet metal. Int J Plast 23:361–38410.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.005 ↗
30. Yoshida K, Suzuki N (2008) Forming limit stresses predicted by phenomenological plasticity theories with anisotropic work-hardening behavior. Int J Plast 24:118–13910.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.008 ↗
31. Zeng D, Laurent C, Cedric XZ, Xinhai Z (2009) A path independent forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming simulations. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 1:809–81710.4271/2008-01-1445 ↗
32. Zimniak Z (2000) Application of a system for sheet metal forming design. J Mater Process 106:159–16210.1016/S0924-0136(00)00608-7 ↗
33. Zimniak Z (2000) Implementation of the forming limit stress diagram in FEM simulations. J Mater Process 106:261–26610.1016/S0924-0136(00)00627-0 ↗