Comparison of different yield criteria in various deep drawn cups
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of three recent yield criteria namely; BBC2008-8p, Yld2003-8p, Hu2003 through the simulation of the hemispherical, cylindrical and square cup drawing processes by comparing the results with the ones obtained by using the von Mises criterion for the isotropic, kinematic and combined hardening and the Hill’48 criterion. For this purpose, two different sheet materials, SS304 stainless steel and DKP6112 steel, and various punch travels were used in the simulations and experimental phases of this study. The BBC2008-8p, Yld2003-8p and Hu2003 models were implemented to the ABAQUS software through the user material subroutine VUMAT. The thickness strain distributions obtained from the simulations were compared with the experimental results to analyze the validity of the three aforementioned criteria. Compared with the other models, the material behavior in deep drawing cases of this study is better predicted with more recent models, namely BBC2008-8p, Yld2003-8p and Hu2003, which include anisotropy parameters found from uniaxial and biaxial tension tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Hill R (1979) Theoretical plasticity of textured aggregates. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 85:179–19110.1017/S0305004100055596 ↗
2. Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals, Part I: a yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast 5:51–6610.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
3. Hill R (1990) Constitutive modeling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals. J Mech Phys Solids 38:405–41710.1016/0022-5096(90)90006-P ↗
4. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7:693–71210.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
5. Hill R (1993) A user-friendly theory of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 35:19–2510.1016/0020-7403(93)90061-X ↗
6. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1993) A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1859–188610.1016/0022-5096(93)90073-O ↗
7. Ferron G, Makkouk R, Morreale J (1994) A parametric description of orthotropic plasticity in metal sheets. Int J Plast 10:431–44910.1016/0749-6419(94)90008-6 ↗
8. Barlat F, Becker RC, Hayashida Y, Maeda Y, Yanagawa M, Chung K, Brem JC, Lege DJ, Matsui K, Murtha SJ, Hattori S (1997) Yielding description for solution strengthened aluminum alloys. Int J Plast 13:385–40110.1016/S0749-6419(97)80005-8 ↗
9. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Choi SH, Pourboghrat F, Chu E, Lege DJ (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Plast 19:1297–131910.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
10. Banabic D, Aretz H, Comsa DS, Paraianu L (2005) An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets. Int J Plast 21:493–51210.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.003 ↗
11. Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon JW, Karabin ME, Brem JC, Dick RE (2005) Linear transformation based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21:1009–103910.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
12. Moreira LP, Ferron G, Ferran G (2000) Experimental and numerical analysis of the cup drawing test for orthotropic metal sheets. J Mat Proc Technol 108:78–8610.1016/S0924-0136(00)00660-9 ↗
13. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
14. Wu HC (2002) Anisotropic plasticity for sheet metals using the concept of combined isotropic-kinematic. Int J Plast 18:1661–168210.1016/S0749-6419(01)00060-2 ↗
15. Hu W (2003) Characterized behaviors and corresponding yield criterion of anisotropic sheet metals. Mat Sci Eng A 345(1):139–14410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00453-7 ↗
16. Hosford WF (1979) On yield loci of anisotropic cubic metals. Proc. 7th North American Metalworking Conf., SME, Dearborn, 191–197
17. Choi Y (2003) Modeling evolution of anisotropy and hardening for sheet metals. Dissertation, Ohio State University
18. Banabic D, Kuwabara T, Balan T, Comsa DS (2004) An anisotropic yield criterion for sheet metals. J Mat Proc Technol 157–158:462–46510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.106 ↗
19. Kuwabara T, Bael AV (1999) Measurement and analysis of yield locus of sheet aluminum alloy 6XXX. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Forming Processes, Numisheet 1999, Besancon, 85–90
20. Kuwabara T, Ikeda S, Kuroda K (1998) Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening in cold-rolled steel sheet under biaxial tension. J Mat Proc Technol 80(8):517–52310.1016/S0924-0136(98)00155-1 ↗
21. Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa DS (2000) A new yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane–stress conditions. The 7th Conf. “TPR2000”, Cluj Napoca, 217–224
22. Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa DS (2000) Yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Metal Forming 2000, Krakow, 755–761
23. Aretz H (2005) A non-quadratic plane stress yield function for orthotropic sheet metals. J Mat Proc Technol 168:1–910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.008 ↗
24. Yoon JW, Hong SH (2006) Modeling of Aluminum Alloy Sheets Based on New Anisotropic Yield Functions. J Mat Proc Technol 177:134–13710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.189 ↗
25. Mattiasson K, Sigvant M (2008) An evaluation of some recent yield criteria for industrial simulations of sheet forming processes. Int J Mech Sci 50:774–78710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.11.002 ↗
26. Soare S, Yoon JW, Cazacu O (2008) On the use of homogeneous polynomials to develop anisotropic yield functions with applications to sheet forming. Int J Plast 24:915–94410.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.016 ↗
27. Xu L, Barlat F, Ahn DC (2009) Constitutive modelling of ferritic stainless steel sheets. Int J Mat Form 2:391–39410.1007/s12289-009-0430-z ↗
28. Comsa DS, Banabic D (2008) Plane-stress yield criterion for highly-anisotropic sheet metals. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Numisheet 2008, Interlaken, 43–48
29. Vrh M, Halilovic M, Starman B, Štok B, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2011) Earing prediction in cup drawing using the BBC2008 yield criterion. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Metal Forming Processes, Numisheet 2011, Seoul, 142–149.10.1063/1.3623604 ↗
30. Vrh M, Halilovic M, Starman B, Štok B, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2014) Capability of the BBC2008 yield criterion in predicting the earing profile in cup deep drawing simulations. Eur J Mech A Solids 45:59–7410.1016/j.euromechsol.2013.11.013 ↗
31. Butuc MC, Teodosiu C, Barlat F, Gracio JJ (2011) Analysis of sheet metal formability through isotropic and kinematic hardening models. Eur J Mech A Solids 30:532–54610.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.03.005 ↗
32. Teodosiu C, Hu Z (1995) Evolution of the intragranular microstructure at moderate and large strains: modelling and computational significance. Proc. of NUMIFORM’95, Rotterdam, 173–182
33. Swift HW (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. J Mech Phys Solids 1:11–1610.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1 ↗
34. Voce E (1955) A practical strain-hardening function. Metallurgica 51:219–220
35. Dasappa P, Inal K, Mishra R (2012) The effects of anisotropic yield functions and their material parameters on prediction of forming limit diagrams. Int J Solids Struct 49:3528–355010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.021 ↗
36. Plunkett B, Cazacu O, Barlat F (2008) Orthotropic yield criteria for description of the anisotropy in tension and compression of sheet metals. Int J Plast 24:847–86610.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.013 ↗
37. Aretz H, Barlat F (2013) New convex yield functions for orthotropic metal plasticity. Int J Non Linear Mech 51:97–11110.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.12.007 ↗
38. Ucan M, Darendeliler H (2013) Comparison of different constitutive models in sheet metal forming. Key Eng Mat 554–557:1203–1216. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.120310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.1203 ↗
39. Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plastic behaviour of stretchability of sheet metals (Part I): a yield function for orthotropic sheet under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast 5:51–5610.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
40. Banabic D (2010) Sheet Metal forming processes: constitutive modelling and numerical simulation. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1 ↗
41. Barlat F, Richmond O (1987) Prediction of tricomponent plane stress yield surfaces and associated flow and failure behavior of strongly textured fcc polycrystalline sheets. Mat Sci Eng 95:15–2910.1016/0025-5416(87)90494-0 ↗
42. Vrh M, Halilovic M, Štok B (2010) Improved explicit integration in plasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81(7):910–93810.1002/nme.2737 ↗
43. Hu W (2005) An orthotropic yield criterion in a 3-D general stress state. Int J Plast 21:1771–179610.1016/j.ijplas.2004.11.004 ↗
44. Lademo O-G, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M (1999) An evaluation of yield criteria and flow rules for aluminium alloys. Int J Plast 15:191–20810.1016/S0749-6419(98)00064-3 ↗
45. Banabic D, Muller W, Pohlandt K (1998) Determination of yield loci from cross tensile tests assuming various kinds of yield criteria, sheet metal forming beyond 2000, Brussels, 343–349
46. Lazarescu L, Ciobanu I, Nicodim IP, Comsa DS, Banabic D (2013) Effect of the mechanical parameters used as input data in the yield criteria on the accuracy of the finite element simulation of sheet metal forming processes. Key Eng Mat 554–557:204–20910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.204 ↗