journal article·2010-04

Design of Complex Sheet Metal Forming Processes: A New Computer Aided Progressive Approach

G. Ingarao, R. Di Lorenzo

Publisher page

Abstract

The growing interest in sheet metal stamping processes, particularly in automotive industry, led to three main issues in this field: request of very complex shapes; growing interest in springback control; solution of multi-objective problems. This makes the design of the sheet metal stamping processes very difficult, since the number of both design variables and design objectives are progressively increased; therefore, proper design methodologies to reduce times and costs are highly required. In this paper, an innovative design approach able to manage and optimize complex stamping operations is proposed. In particular, a progressive design approach based on the integration between numerical simulations, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Pareto optimal solutions search techniques was applied in order to design a complex automotive sheet stamping operation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (8)

Show source-provided references
1. Hu W., Enying L., Li G.Y., Zhong ZH: Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by the use of space mapping based metamodeling method. Int. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39: 642–655, 2008.10.1007/s00170-007-1253-z ↗
2. Lin Z., Wang W., Chen G.: A new strategy to optimize variable blank holder force towards improving the forming limits of aluminium sheet metal forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 183:339–346, 2007.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.027 ↗
3. Shivpuri R., Zhang W.: Robust design of spatially distributed friction for reduced wrinkling and thinning failure in sheet drawing. Materials and Design, 30 (6):2043-2055, 2009.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.08.043 ↗
4. Jansson T., Andersson A., Nilsson L., Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part An evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 159:426–434, 2005.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.011 ↗
5. We L., Yuying Y.: Multi-objective optimization of sheet metal forming process using Pareto-based genetic algorithm. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 208:499-506, 2008.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.014 ↗
6. Zhang W., Shivpuri R.: Probabilistic design of aluminum sheet drawing for reduced risk of wrinkling and fracture. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(2):152–161, 2009.10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.024 ↗
7. Ingarao G., Di Lorenzo R., Micari F.: Analysis of stamping performances of dual phase steels: A multi-objective approach to reduce springback and thinning failure. Materials & Design, 30:4421-4433, 2009.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.001 ↗
8. Oudjene M., Ben-Ayed L., Delameziere A., Batoz J.L.: Shape optimisation of clinching tools using the response surface methodology with Moving Least-Square approximation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,209:289-296, 2009.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.030 ↗