journal article·2008-04

Finite element simulation of composite reinforcement draping using a three node semi discrete triangle

N. Hamila, P. Boisse, S. Chatel

Publisher page

Abstract

Continuous and discrete approaches for forming simulations of textile performs both involve difficulties and drawbacks. The semi-discrete method is an alternative based on a meso-macro approach. It is based on specific finite elements made of a discrete number of the components of the textile at lower scale. Their strain energy in the interpolated displacement field leads to the nodal interior loads of the element. In this paper a new three node element is proposed. It is made up of warp and weft fibres, the tensile and in plane shear energy of which are considered. The directions of the warp and weft yarns are arbitrary with regard to the element sides. That is very important in case of simultaneous multiply draping simulations and when using remeshing. The determination of the material data necessary to the simulation from standard tensile and bias tests is straightforward. A set of elementary tests and mono and multi-ply draping shows the efficiency of the approach.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. ITOOL ‘Integrated Tool for Simulation of Textile Composites’, European Specific Targeted, Research Project, SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME, Aeronautics and Space, http://www.itool.eu
2. Potluri P., Parlak I., Ramgulam R., Sagar T.V., Analysis of tow deformations in textile preforms subjected to forming forces, Composites Science and Technology, 2006, 66, 297–30510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.039 ↗
3. Bickerton S., Simacek P. Guglielmi S.E., Advani S.G., Investigation of draping and its effects on the mold filling process during manufacturing of a compound curved composite part. Composite Part A, 1997, 28, 801–81610.1016/S1359-835X(97)00033-X ↗
4. Boisse P. Finite element analysis of composite forming. In: Long AC, editor. Composite forming technologies. Woodhead Publishing, 2007. Chapter 3: p.46–79.10.1533/9781845692537.46 ↗
5. Scardino F. An introduction to textile structures and their behaviour, Textile structural composites. In: Chou T.W and Ko F.K., editor. Composite Material Series, Elsevier, 1989; p 1–26
6. Long A.C., Clifford M.J. Composite forming mechanisms and material characterisation. In: Composites Forming Technologies. Woodhead Publishing, 2007. p. 1, 21.10.1533/9781845692537.1 ↗
7. Lomov, S. V., Huysmans, G., Luo, Y., Parnas, R., Prodromou, A., Verpoest, I., Phelan, F. R. Textile Composites Models: Integrating Strategies. Composites part A, 2001; 32(10):1379–139410.1016/S1359-835X(01)00038-0 ↗
8. Peng X., Cao J. : A continuum mechanics-based nonorthogonal constitutive model for woven composite fabrics. Composites Part A, 36, 859–874 (2005)10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.08.008 ↗
9. Boisse P., Zouari B., Daniel J. L., Importance of In-Plane Shear Rigidity in Finite Element Analyses of Woven Fabric Composite Preforming. Composites A. 2006; 37(12): 2201–2212.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.018 ↗
10. Hamila N., Boisse P., Simulations of textile composite reinforcement draping using a new semi-discret three node finite element. Composites B. 2007; doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2007.11.008 ↗
11. Allaoui S., Launay J., Soulat D., Chatel S. Experimental tool of woven reinforcement forming. ESAFORM 2008 Proceeding.10.1007/s12289-008-0260-4 ↗
12. Gorczyca J., Sherwood J., Chen J. A friction model for thermostamping commingled glass–polypropylene woven fabrics. Composites: Part A, 2007; 38:393–406.10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.006 ↗