Influence of preforming on the quality of curved composite parts manufactured by flexible injection
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible Injection is a new processing technique for the manufacture of advanced composites made of continuous reinforcing fibers and thermosetting polymer matrix. The primary objective of this new process is to provide faster and less expensive manufacturing than traditional methods like autoclave processing or Resin Transfer Molding. The present paper investigates the effectiveness of the proposed method to produce composite structures possessing sharp corners. A specially devised setup is used to manufacture out of glass fibers and vinyl ester resin a series of Z-shaped parts with small radii. The quality of the fabricated parts is assessed to detect possible defects induced by the manufacturing process. Each stage of the production cycle is analyzed thoroughly to develop a simplified finite element model reproducing the fiber bed behavior during processing. Parametric studies are conducted to evaluate the impact of processing conditions on the quality of final products. The combination of numerical simulations and experimental observations demonstrates clearly the importance of the preforming stage. At the same time, it provides useful insights on the physical phenomena occurring during Flexible Injection.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Ruiz E, Briones LR, Allard É, Trochu F (2008) Flexible injection: a novel LCM technology for low cost manufacturing of high performance composites. Part I: experimental investigation. Proceedings FPCM9, 34
2. Trochu F, Soukane S, Touraine B (2008) Flexible injection: a novel LCM technology for low cost manufacturing of high performance composites. Part II: numerical model. Proceedings FPCM9, 35
3. Causse P, Ruiz E, Trochu F (2011) Experimental study of flexible injection to manufacture parts of strong curvature. Polym Compos 32(6):882–89510.1002/pc.21096 ↗
4. Hubert P, Poursartip A (1998) A Review of flow and compaction modelling relevant to thermoset matrix laminate processing. J Reinf Plast Compos 17(4):286–31810.1177/073168449801700402 ↗
5. Boisse P, Hamila N, Vidal-Salle E, Dumont F (2011) Simulation of wrinkling during textile composite reinforcement forming. Influence of tensile, in-plane shear and bending stiffnesses. Compos Sci Technol 71(5):683–69210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.011 ↗
6. Wisnom MR, Jones MI, Hill GFJ (2001) Interlaminar tensile strength of carbon fibre-epoxy—Specimen size, layup and manufacturing effects. Adv Compos Lett 10(4):171–17710.1177/096369350101000402 ↗
7. Potter K (2002) Beyond the pin-jointed net: maximising the deformability of aligned continuous fibre reinforcements. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 33(5):677–68610.1016/S1359-835X(02)00014-3 ↗
8. Feih S, Shercliff HR (2005) Quality assessment of curved composite components in peel joint structures. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 36(3):397–40810.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.022 ↗
9. Jain LK, Lutton BG, Mai Y-W, Paton R (1997) Stresses and deformations induced during manufacturing. Part II: a study of the spring-in phenomenon. J Compos Mater 31(7):696–71910.1177/002199839703100704 ↗
10. Hubert P, Poursartip A (2001) Aspects of the compaction of composite angle laminates: an experimental investigation. J Compos Mater 35(1):2–2610.1177/002199801772661849 ↗
11. Oakeshott JL, Lemoine D (1998) Experimental study of spring forward in cured laminated U-channels made from unidirectionally reinforced carbon fibre-epoxy prepregs. Plast Rubber Compos Process Appl 27(4):190–199
12. Wiersma HW, Peeters LJB, Akkerman R (1998) Prediction of springforward in continuous-Fibre/Polymer L-shaped parts. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 29(11):1333–134210.1016/S1359-835X(98)00062-1 ↗
13. Li Y, Li M, Gu Y, Zhang Z (2009) Numerical and experimental study on the effect of lay-up type and structural elements on thickness uniformity of L-shaped laminates. Appl Compos Mater 16(2):101–11510.1007/s10443-009-9080-z ↗
14. Naji MI, Hoa SV (1999) Curing of thick angle-bend thermoset composite part: curing cycle effect on thickness variation and fiber volume fraction. J Reinf Plast Compos 18(8):702–72310.1177/073168449901800802 ↗
15. Naji MI, Hoa SV (2000) Curing of thick angle-bend thermoset composite part: curing process modification for uniform thickness and uniform fiber volume fraction distribution. J Compos Mater 34(20):1710–175510.1106/F97F-U8RD-QYN8-Q8JU ↗
16. Hubert P, Vaziri R, Poursartip A (1999) A two-dimensional flow model for the process simulation of complex shape composite laminates. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(1):1–2610.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990110)44:1<1::AID-NME481>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
17. Li M, Tucker CL III (2002) Modeling and simulation of two-dimensional consolidation for thermoset matrix composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 33(6):877–89210.1016/S1359-835X(02)00017-9 ↗
18. Li Y, Li M, Zhang Z, Gu Y (2009) Numerical analysis of parametric effects on consolidation of angle-bended composite laminates. Polym Compos 30(10):1510–151610.1002/pc.20723 ↗
19. Yang SY, Huang CK, Wu CB (1996) Influence of processing on quality of advanced composite tools. J Adv Mater 27(3):37–44
20. Fernlund G, Griffith J, Courdji R, Poursartip A (2002) Experimental and numerical study of the effect of caul-sheets on corner thinning of composite laminates. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 33(3):411–42610.1016/S1359-835X(01)00114-2 ↗
21. Gu Y, Li M, Li Y, Zhang Z (2010) Pressure transfer behaviour of rubber mould and the effects on consolidation of L-shape composite laminates. Polym Polym Compos 18(3):167–174
22. Brillant M, Hubert P (2010) Out-of-autoclave processing of complex shape laminates. SAMPE 2010 “New Materials and Processes fo a New Economy”, electronic proceedings
23. Gao Z-S, Young W-B (2002) Study of the bending induced gap in fiber preforming of woven fiber mats. Polym Compos 23(2):239–24810.1002/pc.10428 ↗
24. Dong C (2011) Model development for the formation of resin-rich zones in composites processing. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 42(4):419–42410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.017 ↗
25. Holmberg JA, Berglund LA (1997) Manufacturing and performance of RTM U-beams. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 28(6):513–52110.1016/S1359-835X(97)00001-8 ↗
26. Arndt RD (1991) Fabric preforming for structural reaction injection molding. Proceedings of the Annual ASM/ESD Advanced Composites Conference, 35–40
27. Robitaille F, Gauvin R (1998) Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturingI: review of experimental results. Polym Compos 19(2):198–21610.1002/pc.10091 ↗
28. Bickerton S, Buntain MJ, Somashekar AA (2003) The viscoelastic compression behavior of liquid composite molding preforms. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 34(5):431–44410.1016/S1359-835X(03)00088-5 ↗
29. Robitaille F, Gauvin R (1998) Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. II: compaction and relaxation of dry and H2O-saturated woven reinforcements. Polym Compos 19(5):543–55710.1002/pc.10128 ↗
30. Gutowski TG, Morigaki T, Cai Z (1987) The consolidation of laminate composites. J Compos Mater 21(2):172–18810.1177/002199838702100207 ↗
31. Sharma SD, Kar KK, Kumar P, Kar KK (2006) Surface roughness of fiber reinforced plastic laminates fabricated using rubber pressure molding technique. Polym Compos 27(5):504–51210.1002/pc.20219 ↗
32. Charmetant A, Vidal-Salle E, Boisse P (2011) Hyperelastic modelling for mesoscopic analyses of composite reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol 71(14):1623–1631. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.004 ↗
33. Chen Q, Boisse P, Park CH, Saouab A, Breard J (2011) Intra/inter-ply shear behaviors of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites in thermoforming processes. Compos Struct 93(7):1692–170310.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.002 ↗
34. Vanclooster K, Lomov SV, Verpoest I (2010) Inter-ply and tool-ply friction measurement of woven reinforced thermoplastic composites at forming conditions. Proc TEXCOMP10, pp 381–388