Real-time prediction by data-driven models applied to induction heating process
Source abstract
Abstract
Data-driven modeling approach constitutes an appealing alternative to the finite element method for optimizing complex multiphysics parametrized problems. In this context, this paper aims at proposing a parametric solution for the temperature-time evolution during the multiphysics induction heating process by using a data-driven non-intrusive modeling approach. To achieve this goal, firstly, a set of synthetic solutions was collected, at some sparse sensors in the space domain and for properly selected process parameters, by solving the full-order finite element models using FORGE® software. Then, the gappy proper orthogonal decomposition method was used to complete the missing data. Next, the proper orthogonal decomposition method coupled with the nonlinear sparse proper generalized decomposition regression method was applied to find a low-dimensional space onto which the original solutions were projected and a model for the low-dimensional representations was, therefore, created. Hence, a real-time prediction of the temperature-time evolution and for any new process parameters could be efficiently computed at the predefined positions (sensors) in the space domain. Finally, spatial interpolation was carried out to extend the solutions everywhere in the spatial domain by applying a strategy based on the nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding method and the proper orthogonal decomposition method with radial basis functions interpolation. It was shown that the results are promising and the applied approaches provide good approximations in the low-data limit case.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Rokicki P (2017) Induction hardening of tool steel for heavily loaded aircraft engine components. Arch Metall Mater 62:315–32010.1515/amm-2017-0047 ↗
2. Candeo A, Ducassy C, Bocher P, Dughiero F (2011) Multiphysics modeling of induction hardening of ring gears for the aerospace industry. IEEE Trans Magn 47:918–92110.1109/TMAG.2010.2073682 ↗
3. Rudnev V, Loveless D, Cook R (2017) Handbook of induction heating. Second Edition, Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group10.1201/9781315117485 ↗
4. Hömberg D (2004) A mathematical model for induction hardening including mechanical effects. Nonlinear Anal-Real World App 5:55–9010.1016/S1468-1218(03)00017-8 ↗
5. Spezzapria M, Dughiero F, Forzan M, Candeo A (2012) Multiphysics fem simulation of contour induction hardening process on aeronautical gears. J Iron Steel Res 19:95–98
6. Wang K, Chandrasekar S, Yang H (1992) Finite-element simulation of induction heat treatment. J Mater Eng Perform 1:97–11210.1007/BF02650041 ↗
7. Samiuddin M, Muzamil M (2016) Experimental investigation and optimization of process parameters for through induction hardening using factorial design of experiments. J Eng Res 5:174–185
8. Hutton D (2004) Fundamentals of finite element analysis, First Edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston
9. Little RJA, Rubin DB (2019) Statistical analysis with missing data, Third Edition. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA
10. Yates F (1933) The analysis of replicated experiments when the field results are incomplete. Am J Exp Agric 1:129–42
11. Everson R, Sirovich L (1995) Karhunen–loève procedure for gappy data. J Opt Soc Am A 12:1657–166410.1364/JOSAA.12.001657 ↗
12. Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis and factor analysis. In: Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York, pp 115–12810.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8_7 ↗
13. Ye J, Janardan R, Li Q (2004) Two-Dimensional Linear discriminant analysis. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS). MIT Press, vol 17, pp 1569–1576
14. Honeine P (2012) Online kernel principal component analysis: a Reduced-Order model. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34:1814–182610.1109/TPAMI.2011.270 ↗
15. Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science 290:2323–232610.1126/science.290.5500.2323 ↗
16. Geng X, Zhan D-C, Zhou Z-H (2005) Supervised nonlinear dimensionality reduction for visualization and classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B (Cybernetics) 35:1098–110710.1109/TSMCB.2005.850151 ↗
17. Chinesta F, Huerta A, Rozza G, Willcox K (2015) Model order reduction. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes T (eds) The encyclo- pedia of computational mechanics. Second Edition. Wiley
18. Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I - Coherent structures. II - Symmetries and transformations. III - Dynamics and scaling. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics - Quart Appl Math 45:561–57110.1090/qam/910462 ↗
19. Hesthaven JS, Rozza G, Stamm B (2015) Certified reduced basis methods for parametrized partial differential equations. Springer International Publishing, SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, 978-3-319-22469-510.1007/978-3-319-22470-1 ↗
20. Girfoglio M, Quaini A, Rozza G (2021) A POD-galerkin reduced order model for a LES filtering approach. J Comput Phys 436:11026010.1016/j.jcp.2021.110260 ↗
21. Ballarin F, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G (2015) Supremizer stabilization of POD–galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102:1136–116110.1002/nme.4772 ↗
22. Karatzas EN, Stabile G, Nouveau L, Scovazzi G, Rozza G (2019) A reduced basis approach for PDEs on parametrized geometries based on the shifted boundary finite element method and application to a Stokes flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 347:568–58710.1016/j.cma.2018.12.040 ↗
23. Bui-Thanh T, Damodaran M, Willcox K (2003) Proper orthogonal decomposition extensions for parametric applications in transonic aerodynamics10.2514/6.2003-4213 ↗
24. Shinde V, Longatte E, Baj F, Hoarau Y, Braza M (2015) A Galerkin-free model reduction approach for the Navier-Stokes equations. J Comput Phys 309:148–16310.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.051 ↗
25. Guénot M, Lepot I, Sainvitu C, Goblet J, Coelho R (2013) Adaptive sampling strategies for non-intrusive POD-based surrogates. Eng Comput 30:521–54710.1108/02644401311329352 ↗
26. Xiao D, Yang P, Fang F, Xiang J, Pain C, Navon IM, Chen M (2017) A non-intrusive reduced-order model for compressible fluid and fractured solid coupling and its application to blasting. J Comput Phys 330:221–24410.1016/j.jcp.2016.10.068 ↗
27. Hamdaoui M, Le Quilliec G, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2013) Surrogate POD models for parametrized sheet metal forming applications. AIP Conf Proc 1532:607–61510.1063/1.4806884 ↗
28. Ripepi M, Verveld M, Karcher N, Franz T, Abu-Zurayk M, Görtz S, Kier T (2018) Reduced-order models for aerodynamic applications, loads and MDO. CEAS Aeronaut J 9:171–19310.1007/s13272-018-0283-6 ↗
29. Dolci V, Arina R (2016) Proper orthogonal decomposition as surrogate model for aerodynamic optimization. Int J Aerosp Eng 2016:1–1510.1155/2016/8092824 ↗
30. Demo N, Tezzele M, Mola A, Rozza G (2019) A complete data-driven framework for the efficient solution of parametric shape design and optimisation in naval engineering problems. In: Proceedings of MARINE 2019: VIII international conference on computational methods in marine engineering, pp 111–121
31. Ibáñez R, Abisset-Chavanne E, Ammar A, Gonzalez D, Cueto E, Huerta A, Duval JL, Chinesta F (2018) A multi-dimensional data-driven sparse identification technique: the sparse proper generalized decomposition. Complexity, Article ID 5608286:1–11
32. Limousin V, Delgerie X, Leroy E, Ibáñez R, Argerich C, Daim F, Duval J, Chinesta F (2019) Advanced model order reduction and artificial intelligence techniques empowering advanced structural mechanics simulations: application to crash test analyses. Mech Ind 20:80410.1051/meca/2020009 ↗
33. Derouiche K, Garois S, Champaney V, Daoud M, Traidi K, Chinesta F (2021) Data-driven modeling for multiphysics parametrized problems-application to induction hardening process. Metals 11:73810.3390/met11050738 ↗
34. Smola A J, Schölkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199–22210.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
35. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. Adaptive computation and machine learning. MIT Press, I-XVIII, 1–24810.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
36. Chinesta F, Keunings R, Leygue A (2014) The proper generalized decomposition for advanced numerical simulations - a primer springerbriefs in applied sciences and technology. Springer, Cham10.1007/978-3-319-02865-1 ↗
37. Bui-Thanh T, Damodaran M, Willcox K (2004) Aerodynamic data reconstruction and inverse design using proper orthogonal decomposition. AIAA J 42:1505–151610.2514/1.2159 ↗
38. Bui-Thanh T, Damodaran M, Willcox K (2003) Proper orthogonal decomposition extensions for parametric applications in compressible aerodynamics. In: Proceedings of the 21st AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, AIAA, pp 2003–421310.2514/6.2003-4213 ↗
39. Astrid P, Weiland S, Willcox K, Backx T (2008) Missing point estimation in models described by proper orthogonal decomposition. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53:2237–225110.1109/TAC.2008.2006102 ↗
40. Venturi D, Karniadakis GEM (2004) Gappy data and reconstruction procedures for flow past a cylinder. J Fluid Mech 519:315–33610.1017/S0022112004001338 ↗
41. Gunes H, Sirisup S, Karniadakis G (2006) Gappy data: To Krig or not to Krig?. J Comput Phys 212:358–38210.1016/j.jcp.2005.06.023 ↗
42. Saul LK, Roweis ST (2003) Think globally, fit locally: Unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds. J Mach Learn Res 4:119–155
43. Yotov K, Pingali K, Stodghill P (2005) Think globally, search locally. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on supercomputing, New York, NY, USA, pp 141–15010.1145/1088149.1088168 ↗
44. Wu H-T, Wu N (2018) Think globally, fit locally under the manifold setup: Asymptotic analysis of locally linear embedding. Ann Stat 46:3805–3837
45. Saul L, Roweis S (2001) An introduction to locally linear embedding
46. Cardinaux D (2008) ÉTude et modélisation numérique 3D par éléments finis d’un procédé de traitement thermique de tôles embouties après chauffage par induction : Application à un renfort de pied central automobile, Thesis, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de, Paris, France
47. Magnabosco I, Ferro P, Tiziani A, Bonollo F (2006) Induction heat treatment of a ISO C45 steel bar: Experimental and numerical analysis. Comput Mater Sci 35:98–10610.1016/j.commatsci.2005.03.010 ↗
48. Ding H, Shin Y (2012) A metallo-thermomechanically coupled analysis of orthogonal cutting of AISI 1045 steel. J Manuf Sci Eng 134:05101410.1115/1.4007464 ↗
49. Geijselaers H (2003) Numerical simulation of stresses due to solid state transformations: The simulation of laser hardening. Thesis university of twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
50. Lee S-J, Pavlina E, Vantyne C (2010) Kinetics modeling of austenite decomposition for an end-quenched 1045 steel. Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing 527:3186–319410.1016/j.msea.2010.01.081 ↗
51. Barba P (2018) Field models of induction heating for industrial applications. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny 1:3–710.15199/48.2018.03.01 ↗
52. Stein M (1987) Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics 29:143–15110.1080/00401706.1987.10488205 ↗
53. Jakobsson S, Andersson B, Edelvik F (2009) Rational radial basis function interpolation with applications to antenna design. J Comput Appl Math 233:889–90410.1016/j.cam.2009.08.058 ↗
54. Buhmann M (2000) Radial basis functions. Acta Numerica 9:1–3810.1017/S0962492900000015 ↗
55. Wendland H (2004) Scattered data approximation cambridge monographs on applied and computational mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511617539 ↗