Uncertainties on the mechanical behaviour of bronze sheets: influence on the failure in bending
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Kuhn HA, Altenberger I, Käufler A, Hölzl H, Fünfer M (2012) Properties of high performance alloys for electromechanical connectors, in: Copper Alloys - Early Applications and Current Performance – Enhancing Processes, 52-68. InTech, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5772/3514810.5772/35148 ↗
2. Hatakeyama K, Sugawara A, Tojyo T, Ikeda K (2002) Factors affecting bend formability of tempered copper alloy sheets. Mater Trans 43(11):2908–2912. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.290810.2320/matertrans.43.2908 ↗
3. Tseng AA, Chen TC, Jen KP, Ochiai T (1994) Forming and fractographical characteristics of copper-nickel-beryllium sheets under tension and bending. J Mater Eng Perform 3:619–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0264526010.1007/bf02645260 ↗
4. Buresch I, Hofmann U, Theobald S (2006) Bendability of Strip Material: A Key Issue for Connector Applications. Copper: Better Properties for Innovative Products, 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527610327.ch2610.1002/9783527610327.ch26 ↗
5. Tan Z, Persson B, Magnusson C (1995) Plastic bending of anisotropic sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 37(4):405–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(94)00069-v10.1016/0020-7403(94)00069-v ↗
6. Leu DK (1997) A simplified approach for evaluating bendability and springback in plastic bending of anisotropic sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 66(1-3):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-0136(96)02453-310.1016/s0924-0136(96)02453-3 ↗
7. Ragab AR, Saleh CA (2005) Evaluation of bendability of sheet metals using void coalescence models. Mater Sci Eng A 395(1-2):102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.12.01110.1016/j.msea.2004.12.011 ↗
8. Mishra A, Thuillier S (2014) Investigation of the rupture in tension and bending of DP980 steel sheet. Int J Mech Sci 84:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.04.02310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.04.023 ↗
9. Dunand M, Mohr D (2010) Hybrid experimental–numerical analysis of basic ductile fracture experiments for sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 47(9):1130–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.12.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.12.011 ↗
10. Kacem A, Krichen A, Manach PY, Thuillier S, Yoon JW (2013) Failure prediction in the hole-flanging process of aluminium alloys. Eng Fract Mech 99:251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.12.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.12.018 ↗
11. Othmen KB, Haddar N, Jegat A, Manach PY, Elleuch K (2020) Ductile fracture of AISI 304L stainless steel sheet in stretching. Int J Mech Sci 172:105404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10540410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105404 ↗
12. Pradeau A, Thuillier S, Yoon JW (2016) Prediction of failure in bending of an aluminium sheet alloy. Int J Mech Sci 119:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.03310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.033 ↗
13. Weckenmann A, Knauer M, Killmaier T (2001) Uncertainty of coordinate measurements on sheet-metal parts in the automotive industry. J Mater Process Technol 115(1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00758-010.1016/S0924-0136(01)00758-0 ↗
14. Conde M, Coppieters S, Andrade-Campos A (2022) A relative approach for uncertainty quantification of inversely identified material behavior using a heterogeneous test for sheet metal. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1238, No. 1, p. 012056). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1238/1/01205610.1088/1757-899X/1238/1/012056 ↗
15. Arnst M, Ponthot JP, Boman R (2018) Comparison of stochastic and interval methods for uncertainty quantification of metal forming processes. CR Mec 346(8):634–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2018.06.00710.1016/j.crme.2018.06.007 ↗
16. Sepahvand K, Marburg S (2014) Identification of composite uncertain material parameters from experimental modal data. Probab Eng Mech 37:148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.06.00810.1016/j.probengmech.2014.06.008 ↗
17. Karthik V, Comstock RJ Jr, Hershberger DL, Wagoner RH (2002) Variability of sheet formability and formability testing. J Mater Process Technol 121(2-3):350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01219-510.1016/S0924-0136(01)01219-5 ↗
18. Ouaidat G, Cherouat A, Kouta R, Chamoret D (2021) Sensitivity analysis of the uncertainties of the mechanical design parameters: stochastic study performed via a numerical design of experiment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(27):14659–14673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.17110.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.171 ↗
19. Prasad K, Kumar D, Krishnaswamy H, Banerjee DK (2023) Uncertainties in the Swift hardening law parameters and their influence on the flow stress and the hole expansion behavior of dual-phase (DP600) steel specimens. J Mater Eng Perform:1–1510.1007/s11665-022-07793-2 ↗
20. Kacem A, Laurent H, Thuillier S (2021) Influence of experimental boundary conditions on the calibration of a ductile fracture criterion. Eng Fract Mech 248:107686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10768610.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107686 ↗
21. Bordignon M (2009) Limites d’utilisation des revêtements d’étain en connectique automobile (in French). Ph.D. thesis, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
22. Standard, A. S. T. M. 2013. E8/E8M-13a, standard test method for determining volume fraction by systematic manual point count. Aug ASTM Int. West Conshohocken PA
23. Pacheco M, García-Herrera C, Celentano D, Ponthot JP (2020) Mechanical Characterization of the Elastoplastic Response of a C11000-H2 Copper Sheet. Materials 13(22):5193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1322519310.3390/ma13225193 ↗
24. Verran GO, Mendes RPK, Dalla Valentina LVO (2008) DOE applied to optimization of aluminum alloy die castings. J Mater Process Technol 200(1-3):120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.08410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.084 ↗
25. Stefanou G, Savvas D, Papadrakakis M (2017) Stochastic finite element analysis of composite structures based on mesoscale random fields of material properties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 326:319–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.00210.1016/j.cma.2017.08.002 ↗
26. Ouaidat G, Cherouat A, Kouta R, Chamoret D (2022) Study of the effect of mechanical uncertainties parameters on performance of PEMFC by coupling a 3D numerical multiphysics model and design of experiment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47(56):23772–2378610.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.151 ↗
27. Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1995) Continuous univariate distributions, volume 2 (Vol. 289). John wiley & sons. https://doi.org/10.2307/127042510.2307/1270425 ↗
28. Ouaidat G, Cherouat A, Kouta R, Chamoret D (2020) Numerical modeling of the mechanical behavior of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance: Design of experiment study and optimization. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45(46):25210–2522610.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.015 ↗