Measurement and analysis of deformation behavior of thermoplastic elastomer tube subjected to biaxial tensile stress under loading and unloading
Source abstract
Abstract
A material testing apparatus for measuring the biaxial deformation behavior of a polymer tube is developed to quantitatively evaluate the deformation behavior of polymeric materials. The testing apparatus can apply axial force and internal pressure to a tubular specimen. A noncontact strain measurement system, where the biaxial strain components and the radius of curvature in the axial direction of the specimen are continuously measured to control the stress path applied to the specimen, is also developed. Thermoplastic elastomer tubes with an outer diameter of 15 mm and a thickness of 2 mm are used as test samples. The samples are subjected to linear stress paths with stress ratios of ({sigma }phi : {sigma } heta =1:0, 4:1, 2:1, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 1:2, 1:4), and 0:1, where ({sigma }phi ) and ({sigma } heta ) are the axial and circumferential stress components, respectively, applied to the center of the bulging specimen. Biaxial stress–strain curves are measured for each linear stress path at a nearly constant logarithmic strain rate of 1 × 10–3 s−1. The contours of equal plastic work plotted in the ({sigma }phi -{sigma } heta ) stress space show significant anisotropy of the test material. A material model for accurately reproducing both the work-hardening behavior and deformation behavior of the test samples is proposed.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Nakayama K (2011) History of plastic forming processes. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 52:60–64. https://doi.org/10.9773/sosei.52.6010.9773/sosei.52.60 ↗
2. Nonomura C, Negishi K, Yamashita K, Kamata S, Araki Y, Matsuyama Y (2000) Deformation behavior of thermoplastics elastomer molding (2) -compressive deformation analysis of cylindrical molding by finite element method-. J Jpn Soc Polym Process 12:516–522. https://doi.org/10.4325/seikeikakou.12.51610.4325/seikeikakou.12.516 ↗
3. ISO 527–1: 2019 Plastics — Determination of tensile properties — Part 1: General principles
4. Sakaguchi K, Kawabata S, Kawai H (1969) Determination of mechanical moduli of polymeric materials by biaxial tensile testing. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 18:325–329. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.18.32510.2472/jsms.18.325 ↗
5. Kitagawa M, Matsutani T (1988) Stress-strain curve in polyethylene. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 37:1391–1396. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.37.139110.2472/jsms.37.1391 ↗
6. Sakaguchi K, Kawabata S, Kawai H, Hazama N (1968) Biaxial tensile tester for flat plates. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 17:356–360. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.17.35610.2472/jsms.17.356 ↗
7. Zeng F, Grognec LP, Lacrampe FM, Krawczak P (2010) A constitutive model for semi-crystalline polymers at high temperature and finite plastic strain: application to PA6 and PE biaxial stretching. Mech Mater 42:686–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.04.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2010.04.006 ↗
8. Makinouchi A, Fujiwara K, Maeda T (1970) The yield condition of polycarbonate under biaxial stress fields -experimental study on yield condition of polycarbonate resin 2nd report-. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 11:192–201
9. Tatenami T, Saito K (1970) A study of plastic flow of polycarbonate resin. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 11:608–616
10. Hyakutake H (1976) Anelastic component of strain for polycarbonate. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 25:760–764. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.25.76010.2472/jsms.25.760 ↗
11. Morishita T (1986) Prediction of yield condition for plastics under biaxial stress fields. J Soc Mater Sci Jpn 35:1267–1271. https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.35.126710.2472/jsms.35.1267 ↗
12. Duvall DE, Edwards DB (1993) Creep and stress rupture testing of polyethylene sheet under equal biaxial tensile stresses. J Reinf Plast Compos 12:285–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844930120030310.1177/073168449301200303 ↗
13. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2001) Multi-axial yield behaviour of polymer foams. Acta Mater 49:1859–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗
14. Shafiq M, Ayyagari SR, Ehaab M, Vural M (2015) Multiaxial yield surface of transversely isotropic foams: part II—experimental. J Mech Phys Solids 76:224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.10.00910.1016/j.jmps.2014.10.009 ↗
15. Ayyagari SR, Vural M (2015) Multiaxial yield surface of transversely isotropic foams: part I—modeling. J Mech Phys Solids 74:49–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.10.00510.1016/j.jmps.2014.10.005 ↗
16. Kuwabara T, Ishiki M, Kuroda M, Takahashi S (2003) Yield locus and work hardening behavior of a thin-walled steel tube subjected to combined tension-internal pressure. J Phys IV 105:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:2003020610.1051/jp4:20030206 ↗
17. Ishiki M, Kuwabara T, Hayashida Y (2011) Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening behavior of pure titanium sheet using spline function. Int J Mater Form 4:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-1024-510.1007/s12289-010-1024-5 ↗
18. Kuwabara T, Sugawara F (2013) Multiaxial tube expansion test method for measurement of sheet metal deformation behavior under biaxial tension for a large strain range. Int J Plast 45:103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.12.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2012.12.003 ↗
19. Hakoyama T, Kuwabara, T (2015) Effect of Biaxial Work Hardening Modeling for Sheet Metals on the Accuracy of Forming Limit Analyses Using the Marciniak-Kuczyński Approach. From Creep Damage Mechanics to Homogenization Methods. 67–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19440-0_410.1007/978-3-319-19440-0_4 ↗
20. Kuwabara T, Mori T, Asano M, Hakoyama T, Barlat F (2017) Material modeling of 6016-O and 6016–T4 aluminum alloy sheets and application to hole expansion forming simulation. Int J Plast 93:164–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.10.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2016.10.002 ↗
21. Isogai Y, Yokoyama A, Nguyen T T B, Sumiyama T, Furuich K, Nonomura C (2018) Deformation behavior of thermoplastic elastomer specimens: observation of the strain behavior in a wide range of tensile speeds. Poly Eng Sci: E151–E157. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2479210.1002/pen.24792 ↗
22. Isogai Y, Wada M, Yokoyama A, Murata M, Sumiyama T, Furuich K, Nonomura C (2018) Deformation behavior of a thermoplastic elastomer-finite element analyses for heat generation phenomenon in large deformation-. J Jpn Soc Polym Process 30:594–602. https://doi.org/10.4325/seikeikakou.30.59410.4325/seikeikakou.30.594 ↗
23. Kubo S, Kuwabara T, Sumiyama T, Kobayashi T, Furuichi K, Nonomura C (2021) Measurement and analysis of deformation behavior of polyethylene tube subjected to biaxial tensile stress with large strain. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 62:73–78. https://doi.org/10.9773/sosei.62.7310.9773/sosei.62.73 ↗
24. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi S-H, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory. Int J Plast 19:1297–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-010.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗