Predicting the tensile behaviour of adhesively bonded sheets using equivalent geometrical heterogeneities
Source abstract
Abstract
In the present work, the formability of adhesively bonded sandwichsteel sheets is predicted during tensile tests, with the help of equivalent geometrical heterogeneities in the base sheets, without incorporating adhesive layer and properties during modelling simulations. This will help us mainly to overcome the difficulties while incorporating adhesion/adhesive properties during formability simulation and prediction. The limit strains during the tensile test are predicted and validated with experiments. The effect of hardener to resin (H/R) ratios of adhesive on the forming limit strains has been predicted with a set of thickness heterogeneity factor ‘f’ and size (w) of the defect, located in the base material. In other words, a relationship between defect morphology (f, w) and adhesive properties has been evaluated. For example, in the case of rectangular-infinite groove of width, w = 0.5 mm, the limit strains of DDQ steel evaluated during tensile tests at f = 0.912, f = 0.9137, f = 0.924, f = 0.927, and f = 0.95 are equivalent to the H/R ratios of 0.6:1, 0.7:1, 0.8:1, 0.9:1, and 1:1 of adhesive, respectively. The limit strains are predicted in the same manner with a square hole and finite square defect in the base material. It is suggested that the overall forming (tensile) behaviour of adhesively bonded blanks (ABB) can be predicted with the help of a thickness heterogeneity factor (or similar geometrical heterogeneities) that is equivalent to all the geometrical and structural heterogeneities in the whole bonded sheets.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Zadpoor AA, Sinke J, Benedictus R (2009) The mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded tailor-made blanks. Int J Adhes Adhes 29:558–57110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.01.003 ↗
2. Zadpoor AA, Sinke J, Benedictus R (2010) Elastoplastic deformation of dissimilar-alloy adhesively-bonded tailor-made blanks. Mater Des 31:4611–462010.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.041 ↗
3. Liu J, Liu W, Xue W (2013) Forming limit diagram prediction of AA5052/polyethylene/AA5052 sandwich sheets. Mater Des 46:112–12010.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.057 ↗
4. Parsa MH, Ettehad M, Matin PH et al (2010) Experimental and numerical determination of limiting drawing ratio of Al3105-polypropylene-Al3105 sandwich sheets. J Eng Mater Technol 132:031004-1–031004-1110.1115/1.4001264 ↗
5. Kim KJ, Kim D, Choi SH et al (2003) Formability of AA5182/polypropylene/AA5182 sandwich sheets. J Mater Process Technol 139:1–710.1016/S0924-0136(03)00173-0 ↗
6. Liu JG, Liu W, Wang JX (2012) Influence of interfacial adhesion strength on formability of AA5052/polyethylene/AA5052 sandwich sheet. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 22:s395–s40110.1016/S1003-6326(12)61737-3 ↗
7. Morovvati MR, Mollaei-Dariani B, Asadian-Ardakani MH (2010) A theoretical, numerical, and experimental investigation of plastic wrinkling of circular two-layer sheet metal in the deep drawing. J Mater Process Technol 210:1738–174710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.004 ↗
8. Morovvati MR, Fatemi A, Sadighi M (2011) Experimental and finite element investigation on wrinkling of circular single layer and two-layer sheet metals in deep drawing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:113–12110.1007/s00170-010-2931-9 ↗
9. Aghchai J, Shakeri M, Dariani BM (2008) Theoretical and experimental formability study of two-layer metallic sheet (Al1100/St12). Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 222:1131–113810.1243/09544054JEM1140 ↗
10. Satheeshkumar V, Ganesh NR (2015) Prediction of formability of adhesive bonded steel sheets and experimental validation. Arch Civil Mech Eng 15(1):30–4110.1016/j.acme.2014.09.002 ↗
11. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K (1967) Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 9:609–62010.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
12. Marciniak Z, Kuczyński K, Pokora T (1973) Influence of the plastic properties of a material on the forming limit diagram for sheet metal in tension. Int J Mech Sci 15:789–80510.1016/0020-7403(73)90068-4 ↗
13. Parmar A, Mellor PB, Chakrabarty J (1977) A new model for the prediction of instability and limit strains in thin sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 19:389–39810.1016/0020-7403(77)90039-X ↗
14. Reyes A, Hopperstad OS, Berstad T, Lademo OG (2008) Prediction of necking for two aluminum alloys under non-proportional loading by using an FE-based approach. Int J Mater Form 1:211–23210.1007/s12289-008-0384-6 ↗
15. Butuc MC, Banabic D, Barata da Rocha A, Gracio JJ, Ferreira Duarte J, Jurco P, Comsa DS (2002) The performance of Yld96 and BBC2000 yield functions in forming limit prediction. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:281–28610.1016/S0924-0136(02)00399-0 ↗
16. Soare S, Banabic D (2008) A note on the MK computational model for predicting the forming limit strains. Int J Mater Form Suppl 1:281–28410.1007/s12289-008-0347-y ↗
17. (2007) ASTME646-07e1: Standard Test Method for Tensile Strain-Hardening Exponents (n-Values) of Metallic Sheet Materials. ASTM Int., West Conshohocken, PA
18. ASTME517-00(2010): Standard test method for plastic strain ratio (r) for sheet metal. Designation. ASTM Int., West Conshohocken, PA,2011
19. ASTM (2010) D638-10: standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM Int, West Conshohocken
20. Narasimhan K, Wagoner RH (1991) Finite element modelling simulation of in-plane forming limit diagrams of sheets containing finite defects. Metall Trans A 22(11):2655–266510.1007/BF02851359 ↗