Sheet Metal Forming Limit Predictions Based on Advanced Constitutive Equations
Source abstract
Abstract
The present paper aims at analysing the strain and stress–based forming limits predicted by an advanced sheet metal forming limit model. The onset of localized necking is simulated through the Marciniak-Kuczinsky (MK ) analysis [1]., which connects the physically-based hardening model accounting for the evolution of the anisotropic work-hardening induced by the microstructural evolution at large strains of Teodosiu and Hu [2] with the phenomenological anisotropic yield criterion Yld2000-2d (Barlat et al., 2003) [3] Linear and complex strain paths are taken into account. The selected material is a DC06 steel sheet. The validity of the model is assessed by comparing the predicted and experimental forming limits. The remarkable accuracy of the developed software on predicting the forming limits is obviously due to the performance of the advanced constitutive equations applied on M-K theory, able to describe with great detail the material behaviour. The effect of the strain-induced anisotropy predicted by the microstructural hardening model on the evolution of formability under strain path changes is particularly aimed it.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (6)
Show source-provided references
1. Marciniak, Z., Kuczynski, K., Pokora, T.: Influence of The Plastic Properties of A Material On The Forming Limit Diagram For Sheet Metal In Tension. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 15 :789-805, 1973.10.1016/0020-7403(73)90068-4 ↗
2. Teodosiu C., Hu Z., Microstructure in the continuum modelling of plastic anisotropy. In: Roskilde. Danemark (Eds.). Proc. Of the 19th Riso International Symposium on Modelling of Structures and Mechanics of Materials from Microscale to Product , 149-168, 1998.
3. Barlat, F., Brem, J. C., Yoon, J. W., Chung, K., Dick, R. E., Lege, D. J., Pourboghrat, F., Choi, S. -H. Chu E.: Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets-part 1: theory. Int. J. Plasticity, 19, 1297-1319, 2003.10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
4. M.C. Butuc, J.J. Gracio and A. Barata da Rocha, “An experimental and theoretical analysis on the application of stressbased forming limit criterion”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 48 (4), pp. 414-429, 2006,10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.11.007 ↗
5. Yoshida, Kengo, Suzuki, Noriyuki: Forming limit stresses predicted by phenomenological plasticity theories with anisotropic work-hardening behaviour. International Journal of Plasticity 24, 118-139, 2008.10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.008 ↗
6. M.C. Butuc , F. Barlat, J.J. Grácio, A. Barata da Rocha “A new model for FLD prediction based on advanced constitutive equations”, International Journal of Material Forming, DOI 10.1007/s12289-009-0667-6 , 200910.1007/s12289-009-0667-6 ↗