Numerical and experimental study of the consolidation of continuous carbon fiber thermoplastics made by robotic 3D printing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology (2015) Standard. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
2. Additive manufacturing of polymers - qualification principles - classification of part properties, Standard, A. International, PA, USA (2023)
3. Ming Y, Zhang S, Han W, Wang B, Duan Y, Xiao H (2020) Investigation on process parameters of 3d printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermosetting epoxy composites. Addit Manuf 33:101184
4. Wang Y, Kong D, Zhang Q, Li W, Liu J (2021) Process parameters and mechanical properties of continuous glass fiber reinforced composites-polylactic acid by fused deposition modeling. J Reinf Plast Compos 40(17–18):686–69810.1177/0731684421998017 ↗
5. Hu Q, Duan Y, Zhang H, Liu D, Yan B, Peng F (2018) Manufacturing and 3d printing of continuous carbon fiber prepreg filament. J Mater Sci 53:1887–189810.1007/s10853-017-1624-2 ↗
6. Pyl L, Kalteremidou K, Van Hemelrijck D (2018) Exploration of specimen geometry and tab configuration for tensile testing exploiting the potential of 3d printing freeform shape continuous carbon fibre-reinforced nylon matrix composites. Polym Test 71:318–32810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.022 ↗
7. Dickson A, Barry J, McDonnell K, Dowling D (2017) Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 16:146–152
8. Zhang H, Chen J, Yang D (2021) Fibre misalignment and breakage in 3d printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Addit Manuf 38:10177510.1016/j.addma.2020.101775 ↗
9. Pappas J, Thakur A, Dong MCLX (2021) A parametric study and characterization of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites for high-speed 3d printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:2137–215110.1007/s00170-021-06723-1 ↗
10. Zhang K, Wu HZqndJ, Chen J, Yang D, (2023) Improved fibre placement in filament-based 3d printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 168:10745410.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107454 ↗
11. Zhang J, Zhou Z, Zhang F, Tan Y, Tu T, Yang B (2020) Performance of 3d-printed continuous-carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics with pressure. Materials 13(2):47110.3390/ma13020471 ↗
12. Fu Y, Yao X (2021) Multi-scale analysis for 3d printed continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. Compos Sci Technol 216:109065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10906510.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109065 ↗
13. Strobl D, Unger JF, Ghnatios C, Klawonn A, Pittner A, Rethmeier M, Robens-Radermacher A (2024) Efficient bead-on-plate weld model for parameter estimation towards effective wire arc additive manufacturing simulation. Weld World 68(4):969–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-024-01700-010.1007/s40194-024-01700-0 ↗
14. Ghnatios C, Fayazbakhsh K (2022) Warping estimation of continuous fiber-reinforced composites made by robotic 3d printing. Addit Manuf 55:10279610.1016/j.addma.2022.102796 ↗
15. Zhang J, Yang W, Li Y (2023) Process-dependent multiscale modeling for 3d printing of continuous fiber-reinforced composites. Addit Manuf 73:103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10368010.1016/j.addma.2023.103680 ↗
16. Kobler E, Birtha J, Marschik C, Straka K, Steinbichler G, Schlecht S (2023) Modeling the anisotropic squeeze flow during hot press consolidation of thermoplastic unidirectional fiber-reinforced tapes. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 0(0):08927057231214458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705723121445810.1177/08927057231214458 ↗
17. Song Q, Liu W, Chen J, Zhao D, Yi C, Liu R, Geng Y, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Yuan Y (2022) Research on void dynamics during in situ consolidation of cf/high-performance thermoplastic composite. Polymers 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1407140110.3390/polym14071401 ↗
18. Ericksen J (1959) Anisotropic fluids. Archive of rational mechanics analysis 4:231–23710.1007/BF00281389 ↗
19. Becker R, Feng X, Prohl A (2008) Finite element approximations of the ericksen-leslie model for nematic liquid crystal flow. SIAM J Numer Anal 46(4):1704–1731. https://doi.org/10.1137/07068254X10.1137/07068254X ↗
20. Ghnatios C, Abisset-Chavanne E, Binetruy C, Chinesta F, Advani S (2016) 3d modeling of squeeze flow of multiaxial laminates. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 234:188–20010.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.06.004 ↗
21. Shuler S, Advani S (1996) Transverse squeeze flow of concentrated aligned fibres in viscous fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 65:47–7410.1016/0377-0257(96)01440-1 ↗
22. Shuler S, Advani S (1997) Flow instabilities during the squeeze flow of multiaxial laminates. J Compos Mater 31(21):2156–216010.1177/002199839703102102 ↗
23. Ghnatios C, Abisset-Chavanne E, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2016) 3D modelling of squeeze flow of unidirectional and fabric composite inserts. AIP Conf Proc 1769(1):170045. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496360110.1063/1.4963601 ↗
24. Ibanez R, Abisset-Chavanne E, Chinesta F, Huerta A (2017) Simulating squeeze flows in multiaxial laminates: Towards fully 3d mixed formulations. Int J Mater Form. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-016-1309-410.1007/s12289-016-1309-4 ↗
25. Ghnatios C, Abisset-Chavanne E, Binetruy C, Chinesta F, Advani S (2016) 3d modeling of squeeze flow of unidirectionally thermoplastic composite inserts. AIP Conf Proc 1769(1):170002
26. Chinesta F, Keunings R, Leygue A (2014) The proper generalized decomposition for advanced numerical simulations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02865-110.1007/978-3-319-02865-1 ↗
27. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Cueto E (2010) Recent advances in the use of the proper generalized decomposition for solving multidimensional models. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(4):327–35010.1007/s11831-010-9049-y ↗
28. Hamidi AE, Ossman H, Jazar M (2017) On the convergence of alternating minimization methods in variational pgd. Comput Optim Appl 68(2):455–47210.1007/s10589-017-9920-y ↗
29. Ammar A, Chinesta F, Diez P, Huerta A (2010) An error estimator for seperated representations of highly multidimensional models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:1872–188010.1016/j.cma.2010.02.012 ↗
30. Abedi K, Miri S, Gregorash L, Fayazbakhsh K (2022) Evaluation of electromagnetic shielding properties of high-performance continuous carbon fiber composites fabricated by robotic 3d printing. Addit Manuf 54:10273310.1016/j.addma.2022.102733 ↗
31. Miri S, Kalman J, Canart J, Spangler J, Fayazbakhsh K (2022) Tensile and thermal properties of low-melt poly aryl ether ketone reinforced with continuous carbon fiber manufactured by robotic 3d printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 122(2):1041–105310.1007/s00170-022-09983-7 ↗
32. Hamidi AE, Chahbi C (2022) Global convergence of rank-one pgd approximations by alternate minimization. Differ Equ Appl 14(3):469–485
33. Ghnatios C, Chinesta F, Binetruy C (2015) 3d modeling of squeeze flows occuring in composite laminates. Int J Mater Form 8(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-013-1149-410.1007/s12289-013-1149-4 ↗
34. Tlupova S, Cortez R (2009) Boundary integral solutions of coupled stokes and darcy flows. J Comput Phys 228:158–17910.1016/j.jcp.2008.09.011 ↗
35. Ghnatios C, Hachem E (2019) A stabilized mixed formulation using the proper generalized decomposition for fluid problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:769–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.09.03010.1016/j.cma.2018.09.030 ↗
36. Hughes T, Liu W, Brooks A (1979) Finite element analysis of incompressible viscous flows by the penalty function formulation. J Comput Phys 30:1–6010.1016/0021-9991(79)90086-X ↗
37. Bognet B (2013) Stratégie numériques avancées pour la simulation de modeles définis sur une géométrie de plaques et coques: solution 3d avec une complexité 2d, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Centrale Nantes
38. Ghnatios C, Mathis CH, Simic R, Spencer ND, Chinesta F (2017) Modeling soft permeable matter with the proper generalized decomposition (pgd) approach, and verification by means of nanoindentation. Soft Matter 13:4482–449310.1039/C7SM00246G ↗
39. Aguado J, Borzacchiello D, Ghnatios C, Lebel F, Upadhyay R, Binetruy C, Chinesta F (2017) A simulation app based on reduced order modeling for manufacturing optimization of composite outlet guide vanes. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 4(1):1–2610.1186/s40323-017-0087-y ↗
40. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Keunings R (2011) An overview of the proper generaliezd decomposition with applications in computational rehology. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 166:578–59210.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.12.012 ↗
41. Sancarlos A, Ghnatios C, Duval J-L, Zerbib N, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2021) Fast computation of multi-parametric electromagnetic fields in synchronous machines by using pgd-based fully separated representations. Energies 14(5):1454. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1405145410.3390/en14051454 ↗
42. Slange T, Warnet L, Grouve W, Akkerman R (2018) Deconsolidation of c/peek blanks: on the role of prepreg, blank manufacturing method and conditioning. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 113:189–19910.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.034 ↗
43. Simacek P, Niknafs Kermani N, Gargitter V, Advani SG (2022) Role of resin percolation in gap filling mechanisms during the thin ply thermosetting automated tape placement process. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 152:106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10667710.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106677 ↗
44. Niknafs Kermani N, Gargitter V, Simacek P, Advani SG (2021) Gap filling mechanisms during the thin ply automated tape placement process. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 147:106454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10645410.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106454 ↗