journal article·2022-07

Research on hydroforming through combination of internal and external pressures for manufacturing the structure of double-layer tube with gap

Hong-Liang Zhu, Yong Xu, Wei-Jin Chen, Shi-Hong Zhang, Dorel Banabic, Lucian Lăzărescu, Artur I. Pokrovsky

Publisher page

Abstract

According to the current development of commercial vehicles, a novel structure of the double-layer exhaust pipe with gap was designed. Hydroforming through the combination of internal and external pressures (HIEP) was proposed to form the complex structure of the new exhaust pipe. The double-layer tube without gap was used as the initial tube blank. High-pressure liquid was introduced into the inner tube and between the two tubes. The outer tube would bulge outward and fit the die cavity as its inner surface was subjected to hydraulic pressure. Meanwhile, the inner tube would not deform due to both the inner and outer surfaces were subjected to hydraulic pressure. In addition, before the HIEP, it is necessary to pre-bend the double-layer tube. The feasibility of the process was analyzed by numerical simulation. The process parameters were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). The objective functions such as the maximum thinning rate, unevenness of wall thickness and gap dispersion were established in RSM models, whose accuracy was verified by a statistical method of analysis of variance. Subsequently, the die of HIEP was designed and developed. The verification experiments were carried out and the double-layer exhaust pipe with gap was successfully manufactured.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Yamaji K, Tomimatsu M, Takagi I, Higuchi A, Yoshida T, Murase E (2018) New 2.0L I4 gasoline direct injection engine with Toyota new global architecture concept. SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0370. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-037010.4271/2018-01-0370 ↗
2. Reurings C, Koussios S, Bergsma OK, Breugem WP, Vergote K, Paeshuyse L, Benedictus R (2020) The influence of a porous, compliant layer with overlying discrete roughness elements as exhaust pipe wall on friction and heat transfer. Heat Mass Transf 56(8):2367–238710.1007/s00231-020-02855-4 ↗
3. Xia LL, Xu Y, El-Aty AA, Zhang SH, Nielsen KB, Li JM (2019) Deformation characteristics in hydro-mechanical forming process of thin-walled hollow component with large deformation: experimentation and finite element modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:4705–471410.1007/s00170-019-04346-1 ↗
4. Dohmann F, Hartl C (1996) Hydroforming - a method to manufacture light-weight parts. J Mater Process Technol 60(1–4):669–67610.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-X ↗
5. Chen DY, Xu Y, Zhang SH, Ma Y, El-Aty AA, Banabic D, Pokrovsky AI, Bakinovskaya AA (2021) A novel method to evaluate the high strain rate formability of sheet metals under impact hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 287:116533
6. Reddy BV, Kondayya D, Goud EV, Reddy PV (2021) Yield criterion influence on the formability prediction of SS 304 by tensile tests and bulge tests during tube hydroforming process. Multiscale and Multidiscip Model Exp and Des 4:293–30210.1007/s41939-021-00096-4 ↗
7. Cui XL, Wang XS, Yuan SJ (2014) Deformation analysis of double-sided tube hydroforming in square-section die. J Mater Process Tech 214(7):1341–135110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.005 ↗
8. Alaswad A, Olabi AG, Benyounis KY (2011) Integration of finite element analysis and design of experiments to analyse the geometrical factors in bi-layered tube hydroforming. Mater Des 32:838–85010.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.015 ↗
9. Müller K, Stonis M, Lücke M, Behrens BA (2012) Hydroforging of thick-walled hollow aluminum profiles. Key Eng Mater 504-506:181–18610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.181 ↗
10. Wang HF, Han JT, Zhang H (2013) The basic research on numerical simulation of bimetal composited T-tube through hydraulic bulging. Appl Mech Mater 278-280:487–49010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.278-280.487 ↗
11. Feng YY, Zhang HG, Luo ZA, Wu QL (2019) Loading path optimization of T tube in hydroforming process using response surface method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:1979–199510.1007/s00170-018-3087-2 ↗
12. Huang TL, Song XW, Liu M (2016) The optimization of the loading path for T-shape tube hydroforming using adaptive radial basis function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9–12):1843–185710.1007/s00170-015-7534-z ↗
13. Huang TL, Song XW, Liu XY (2016) The multi-objective robust optimization of the loading path in the T-shape tube hydroforming based on dual response surface model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9):1595–160510.1007/s00170-015-7494-3 ↗
14. Liu HX, Gong JX, Ma YJ, Cui JK, Li MW, Wang X (2020) Investigation of novel laser shock hydroforming method on micro tube bulging. Opt Laser Eng 129:10607310.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106073 ↗
15. Hill R (1990) Constitutive modelling of orthotropic plasticity in sheet metals. J Mech Phys Solids 38(3):405–41710.1016/0022-5096(90)90006-P ↗
16. Vinayagamoorthy R, Manoj IV, Kumar GN, Chand IS, Kumar GVS, Kumar KS (2018) A central composite design based fuzzy logic for optimization of drilling parameters on natural fiber reinforced composite. J Mech Sci Technol 32:2011–202010.1007/s12206-018-0409-0 ↗
17. Peng B, Wang Y (2020) Finite element simulation analysis of tube winding forming process. Light industrial. Sci Technol 36(11):31-32+38 (in Chinese)
18. Han C, Feng H, Yuan SJ (2017) Springback and compensation of bending for hydroforming of advanced high-strength steel welded tubes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3619–362910.1007/s00170-016-9319-4 ↗
19. Salehi M, Hosseinzadeh M, Elyasi M (2016) A Study on Optimal Design of Process Parameters in Tube Drawing Process of Rectangular Parts by Combining Box–Behnken Design of Experiment, Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm. Trans Indian Inst Metals 69(6):1223–123510.1007/s12666-015-0670-1 ↗
20. Zhou J, Zhuo F, Huang L, Luo Y (2015) Multi-objective optimization of stamping forming process of head using Pareto-based genetic algorithm. J Cent South Univ 22:3287–329510.1007/s11771-015-2868-0 ↗
21. Chen MT, Xiao XT, Tong JH, Guo H, Wen JP (2018) Optimization of loading path in hydroforming of parallel double branched tube through response surface methodology. Adv Eng Softw 115:429–43810.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.11.003 ↗
22. Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE (2006) Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 91:992–100710.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018 ↗
23. Chaudhari R, Vora JJ, Prabu SSM, Palani IA, Patel VK, Parikh DM (2019) Pareto optimization of WEDM process parameters for machining a NiTi shape memory alloy using a combined approach of RSM and heat transfer search algorithm. Adv Manuf 9:64–8010.1007/s40436-019-00267-0 ↗
24. Liu YF, Li JJ, Shuang Y, Ge XY, Chen XC, Luo JB (2020) Enhancement of friction performance of fluorinated graphene and molybdenum disulfide coating by microdimple arrays. Carbon 167:122–13110.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.041 ↗