Modeling of distortional hardening including plane strain tension and pure shear for a TWIP steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper focuses on calibrating and modeling of distortional hardening behaviours in twinning induced plasticity steels. True stress-strain curves for uniaxial tension, plane strain tension, and pure shear specimens are inversely identified from corresponding load-displacement curves. The study reveals that accurately predicting the hardening behaviours of TWIP980 steel under plane strain tension and pure shear stress states is challenging with an isotropic hardening model, and a negative hydrostatic effect for TWIP980 is observed through shear testing. A novel distortional hardening model is proposed to simultaneously accommodate the three stress states on the contours of plastic work. Coefficients of the distortional hardening model are calibrated at discrete levels of plastic work and then interpolated to describe the distortion of the initial yield surface. The model is then expanded to consider the true stress-strain curves under uniaxial tension along 0, 45 and 90-degree directions, as well as under the plane strain tension along the 0-degree direction simultaneously. This expansion explicitly incorporates the three true stress-strain curves under uniaxial tension, with the curve of plane strain tension captured by an evolutionary exponent related to plastic work. The developed distortional hardening models demonstrate reasonable reproduction of load-displacement curves for TWIP980 steel under uniaxial tension, plane strain tension, and pure shear stress states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahn K (2020) Plastic bending of sheet metal with tension/compression asymmetry. Int J Solids Struct 204–205:65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.05.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.05.022 ↗
2. Kumar MA, N’souglo KE, Hosseini N et al (2022) Theoretical predictions of dynamic necking formability of ductile metallic sheets with evolving plastic anisotropy and tension-compression asymmetry. Int J Mater Form 15:51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01696-210.1007/s12289-022-01696-2 ↗
3. Kuroda M, Tvergaard V (2000) Forming limit diagrams for anisotropic metal sheets with different yield criteria. Int J Solids Struct 37:5037–5059. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00200-010.1016/S0020-7683(99)00200-0 ↗
4. Cauvin L, Raghavan B, Jin J et al (2022) Investigating the plastic anisotropy and hardening behavior of a commercial Zn–Cu–Ti alloy: experimental & modeling approach. Mech Mater 164:104103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10410310.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104103 ↗
5. Hill R, Hutchinson JW (1992) Differential hardening in sheet metal under Biaxial Loading: a theoretical Framework. J Appl Mech 59:S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.289948910.1115/1.2899489 ↗
6. Hill R, Hecker SS, Stout MG (1994) An investigation of plastic flow and differential work hardening in orthotropic brass tubes under fluid pressure and axial load. Int J Solids Struct 31:2999–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)90065-510.1016/0020-7683(94)90065-5 ↗
7. Kuwabara T, Ikeda S, Kuroda K (1998) Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening in cold-rolled steel sheet under biaxial tension. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00155-110.1016/S0924-0136(98)00155-1 ↗
8. Wu K (2022) Ductile fracture with distortional hardening under the non-proportional loadings. PhD Thesis, Deakin University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23684.7104110.13140/RG.2.2.23684.71041 ↗
9. Stoughton TB, Yoon JW (2009) Anisotropic hardening and non-associated flow in proportional loading of sheet metals. Int J Plast 25:1777–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.003 ↗
10. Chen Z, Wang Y, Lou Y (2022) User-friendly anisotropic hardening function with non-associated flow rule under the proportional loadings for BCC and FCC metals. Mech Mater 165:104190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10419010.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104190 ↗
11. Tozawa Y (1978) Plastic deformation behavior under conditions of combined stress. In: Koistinen DP, Wang N-M (eds) Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Premium Publishing Corporation, New York, pp 81–11010.1007/978-1-4613-2880-3_4 ↗
12. Kuwabara T, Mori T, Asano M et al (2017) Material modeling of 6016-O and 6016-T4 aluminum alloy sheets and application to hole expansion forming simulation. Int J Plast 93:164–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.10.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2016.10.002 ↗
13. Iftikhar CMA, Li YL, Kohar CP et al (2021) Evolution of subsequent yield surfaces with plastic deformation along proportional and non-proportional loading paths on annealed AA6061 alloy: experiments and crystal plasticity finite element modeling. Int J Plast 143:102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10295610.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102956 ↗
14. Iftikhar CMA, Khan AS (2021) The evolution of yield loci with finite plastic deformation along proportional and non-proportional loading paths in an annealed extruded AZ31 magnesium alloy. Int J Plast 143:103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10300710.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103007 ↗
15. Pham QT, Lee MG, Suk Kim Y (2020) Distortional hardening behavior and strength different effect of pure Titanium Grade 1 sheets: experimental observation and constitutive modeling. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 967:012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/967/1/01205210.1088/1757-899X/967/1/012052 ↗
16. Yoshida F, Hamasaki H, Uemori T (2015) Modeling of anisotropic hardening of sheet metals including description of the Bauschinger effect. Int J Plast 75:170–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.02.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2015.02.004 ↗
17. Bandyopadhyay K, Basak S, Prasad KS et al (2019) Improved formability prediction by modeling evolution of anisotropy of steel sheets. Int J Solids Struct 156–157:263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2018.08.02410.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2018.08.024 ↗
18. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond Math Phys Sci 193:281–297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.004510.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
19. Lee E-H, Stoughton TB, Yoon JW (2017) A yield criterion through coupling of quadratic and non-quadratic functions for anisotropic hardening with non-associated flow rule. Int J Plast 99:120–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.08.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2017.08.007 ↗
20. Hu Q, Yoon JW, Manopulo N, Hora P (2021) A coupled yield criterion for anisotropic hardening with analytical description under associated flow rule: modeling and validation. Int J Plast 136:102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10288210.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102882 ↗
21. Soare S, Yoon JW, Cazacu O (2008) On the use of homogeneous polynomials to develop anisotropic yield functions with applications to sheet forming. Int J Plast 24:915–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.01610.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.016 ↗
22. Ahn DC, Yoon JW, Kim KY (2009) Modeling of anisotropic plastic behavior of ferritic stainless steel sheet. Int J Mech Sci 51:718–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.08.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.08.003 ↗
23. Ahn K, Seo M-H (2018) Effect of anisotropy and differential work hardening on the failure prediction of AZ31B magnesium sheet at room temperature. Int J Solids Struct 138:181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.011 ↗
24. Hu Q, Yoon JW (2021) Analytical description of an asymmetric yield function (Yoon2014) by considering anisotropic hardening under non-associated flow rule. Int J Plast 140:102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10297810.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102978 ↗
25. Mattiasson K (2005) On the influence of the yield locus shape in the simulation of sheet stretch forming. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP, pp 395–40010.1063/1.2011252 ↗
26. Flores P, Duchene L, Bouffioux C et al (2007) Model identification and FE simulations: Effect of different yield loci and hardening laws in sheet forming. Int J Plast 23:420–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.006 ↗
27. Pilthammar J, Banabic D, Sigvant M (2021) BBC05 with non-integer exponent and ambiguities in Nakajima yield surface calibration. Int J Mater Form 14:577–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01545-010.1007/s12289-020-01545-0 ↗
28. Vegter H, van den Boogaard AH (2006) A plane stress yield function for anisotropic sheet material by interpolation of biaxial stress states. Int J Plast 22:557–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.009 ↗
29. Peng F, Dong X, Tian X et al (2015) An interpolation-type orthotropic yield function and its application under biaxial tension. Int J Mech Sci 99:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.05.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.05.008 ↗
30. Hao S, Dong X (2020) Interpolation-based plane stress anisotropic yield models. Int J Mech Sci 178:105612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10561210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105612 ↗
31. Lou Y, Zhang S, Yoon JW (2020) Strength modeling of sheet metals from shear to plane strain tension. Int J Plast 134:102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10281310.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102813 ↗
32. Zhang S, Lou Y, Yoon JW (2023) Earing prediction with a stress invariant-based anisotropic yield function under non-associated flow rule. Int J Mater Form 16:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01749-010.1007/s12289-023-01749-0 ↗
33. Lou Y, Huh H (2013) Prediction of ductile fracture for advanced high strength steel with a new criterion: experiments and simulation. J Mater Process Technol 213:1284–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.001 ↗
34. Merklein M, Biasutti M (2011) Forward and reverse simple shear test experiments for material modeling in forming simulations. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, pp 702–707
35. Barlat F, Becker RC, Hayashida Y et al (1997) Yielding description for solution strengthened aluminum alloys. Int J Plast 13:385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(97)80005-810.1016/S0749-6419(97)80005-8 ↗
36. Chung K, Lee M-G, Kim D et al (2005) Spring-back evaluation of automotive sheets based on isotropic-kinematic hardening laws and non-quadratic anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21:861–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.01610.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.016 ↗
37. Choi H, Yoon JW (2019) Stress integration-based on finite difference method and its application for anisotropic plasticity and distortional hardening under associated and non-associated flow rules. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:123–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.03110.1016/j.cma.2018.10.031 ↗
38. Yoshida F, Hamasaki H, Uemori T (2013) A user-friendly 3D yield function to describe anisotropy of steel sheets. Int J Plast 45:119–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.010 ↗
39. Jeong JS, Woo W, Oh KH et al (2012) In situ neutron diffraction study of the microstructure and tensile deformation behavior in Al-added high manganese austenitic steels. Acta Mater 60:2290–2299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.04310.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.043 ↗
40. Shterner V, Molotnikov A, Timokhina I et al (2014) A constitutive model of the deformation behaviour of twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) steel at different temperatures. Mater Sci Eng: A 613:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.07310.1016/j.msea.2014.06.073 ↗
41. Kim J-K, De Cooman BC (2016) Stacking fault energy and deformation mechanisms in Fe-xMn-0.6 C-yAl TWIP steel. Mater Sci Eng: A 676:216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.10610.1016/j.msea.2016.08.106 ↗
42. Kim J, Lee S-J, De Cooman BC (2011) Effect of Al on the stacking fault energy of Fe–18Mn–0.6 C twinning-induced plasticity. Scr Mater 65:363–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.01410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.014 ↗
43. Weiss M, Mester K, Taylor A, Stanford N (2018) A critical assessment of deformation twinning and epsilon martensite formation in austenitic alloys during complex forming operations. Mater Charact 145:423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.00310.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.003 ↗
44. Cazacu O, Plunkett B, Barlat F (2006) Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal closed packed metals. Int J Plast 22:1171–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.06.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2005.06.001 ↗
45. Yoon JW, Lou Y, Yoon J, Glazoff MV (2014) Asymmetric yield function based on the stress invariants for pressure sensitive metals. Int J Plast 56:184–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.008 ↗
46. Meng L, Yang P, Xie Q et al (2007) Dependence of deformation twinning on grain orientation in compressed high manganese steels. Scr Mater 56:931–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.028 ↗
47. Mohammadzadeh R (2019) Deformation characteristics of nanocrystalline TWIP steel under uniaxial tension and compression. Mech Mater 138:103147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10314710.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103147 ↗
48. Brosius A, Küsters N, Lenzen M (2018) New method for stress determination based on digital image correlation data. CIRP Ann 67:269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.02610.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.026 ↗