Bore-expanding test for thermosetting carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Press forming technology for carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) sheets consisting of thermosetting resin and continuous fibers is required to manufacture lightweight structures. It is considered that the formability of CFRP sheets is less than that of metallic sheets. Formability tests for metallic sheets can also be applied to compare the formability of CFRP sheets. There are four types of formability for metallic sheets; bendability, deep drawability, stretchability, and stretch flangeability. Bending and stretching tests for CFRP sheets under a suitable forming temperature and means of assisting the deformation of the sheets have been developed. The stretch flangeability of CFRP sheets should be low because cracks in the resin around the edge tend to develop under smaller strain. In this study, the bore-expanding ratio was obtained in a bore-expanding test to determine the stretch flangeability of laminated CFRP structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Hull D & Clyne TW (1981) An Introduction to Composite Materials. Cambridge Solid State Science Series.
2. Advanced High Strength Steel Application Guidelines. International Iron & Steel Institute, ver. 4.1, 2009.
3. Mallon PJ, O’Bradaigh CM (1988) Development of a pilot autoclave for polymeric diaphragm forming of continuous fibre-reinforced thermoplastics. Composites 19(1):37–4710.1016/0010-4361(88)90542-3 ↗
4. Kendall KN, Rudd CD, Owen MJ, Middleton V (1992) Characterization of the resin transfer moulding process. Compos Manuf 3-4:235–24910.1016/0956-7143(92)90111-7 ↗
5. González-Romero VM, Macosko CW (1990) Process parameters estimation for structural reaction injection molding and resin transfer molding. Polym Eng Sci 30(3):142–14610.1002/pen.760300303 ↗
6. Bigg DM, Preston JR (1989) Stamping of thermoplastic matrix composites. Polym Compos 10(4):261–26810.1002/pc.750100409 ↗
7. Yanagimoto J, Ikeuchi K (2012) Sheet forming process of carbon fiber reinforced plastics for lightweight parts. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 61(1):247–25010.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.129 ↗
8. Jeong C, Oya T, Yanagimoto J (2013) Analysis of fracture behavior and stress–strain distribution of martensite/austenite multilayered metallic sheet. J Mater Process Technol 213(4):614–62010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.10.017 ↗
9. Holmberg S, Enquist B, Thilderkvist P (2004) Evaluation of sheet metal formabiltiy by tensile tests. J Mater Process Technol 145:72–8310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.004 ↗
10. Uriya Y, Yanagimoto J (2015) Suitable structure of thermosetting CFRP sheet for cold/warm forming. Int J Mater Form:1–10
11. Uriya Y & Yanagimoto J. Erichsen cupping test of thermosetting CFRP sheets. Int J Mater Form. doi: 10.1007/s12289-016-1298-310.1007/s12289-016-1298-3 ↗
12. ISO 16630 (2009) Metallic materials - sheet and strip - hole expanding test.
13. Standard B, ISO B (1996) Plastics—determination of tensile properties—. Part 1:527–521
14. Takuda H, Tanaka Y, Hatta N (1998) Finite element analysis of forming limit in bore expanding of aluminium alloy sheets. Arch Appl Mech 68(7–8):566–57610.1007/s004190050187 ↗
15. Takuda H, Mori K, Fujimoto H, Hatta N (1999) Prediction of forming limit in bore-expanding of sheet metals using ductile fracture criterion. J Mater Process Technol 92:433–43810.1016/S0924-0136(99)00122-3 ↗