Simulation and automation of aluminum panel shot peen forming
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a methodology for automated forming of metal plates into freeform shapes using shot peening. The methodology is based on a simulation software that computes the peening pattern and simulates the effect of its application. The pattern generation requires preliminary experimental characterization of the treatment. The treatment is applied by a shot peening robot. The program for the robot is generated automatically according to the peening pattern. We validate the methodology with a series of tests. Namely, we form nine aluminum plates into doubly curved shapes and we also shape model airplane wing skins. The article describes the complete workflow and the experimental results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Ramati S, Kennerknecht S, Levasseur G (1999) Single piece wing skin utilization via advanced peen forming technologies. Proceedings of the ICSP7, Warsaw
2. Merino J, Patzelt A, Steinacher A, Windisch M, Heinrich G, Forster R, Bauer C (2017) Ariane 6-tanks and structures for the new european launcher
3. Yan A-M, Klappka I (2008) Springback in stretch forming process of aeronautic panel production by finite element simulation. Int J Mater Forming 1:201–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0026-z10.1007/s12289-008-0026-z ↗
4. Kurukuri S, Miroux A, Wisselink H, Van den Boogaard T (2011) Simulation of stretch forming with intermediate heat treatments of aircraft skins: A physically based modeling approach. Int J Mater Forming 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-1013-810.1007/s12289-010-1013-8 ↗
5. Russig C, Bambach M, Hirt G, Holtmann N (2014) Shot peen forming of fiber metal laminates on the example of glare (r). Int J Mater Forming 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-013-1137-810.1007/s12289-013-1137-8 ↗
6. Wüstefeld F, Linnemann W, Kittel S (2006) Towards peen forming process automation. Shot Peening, 4410.1002/3527606580.ch6 ↗
7. Miao HY, Faucheux PA, levesque M, Gosselin F (2021) Residual stress measurements of conventional and stress peen formed 2024-T3 aluminum sheets. engrXiv. https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/c5t9r10.31224/osf.io/c5t9r ↗
8. Friese A (2006) Ksa develops new automated peen forming for wing skins. Shot Peener Magazine 16
9. Chen Z, Yang F, Meguid S (2014) Realistic finite element simulations of arc-height development in shot-peened almen strips. J Eng Mater Technol 136:041002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402800610.1115/1.4028006 ↗
10. Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids. vol. 3. Springer Sci & Business Media 580:2110.1007/978-94-009-3489-4 ↗
11. Korsunsky A (2005) The modelling of residual stresses due to surface peening using eigenstrain distributions. J Strain Anal Eng Design 40:817–824. https://doi.org/10.1243/030932405X3098410.1243/030932405X30984 ↗
12. Faucheux PA, Gosselin FP (2018) Lévesque M: Simulating shot peen forming with eigenstrains. J Mater Process Technol 254:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.03610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.036 ↗
13. Korsunsky A (2006) Residual elastic strain due to laser shock peening: Modelling by eigenstrain distribution. J Strain Anal Eng Design 41:195–204. https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247JSA14110.1243/03093247JSA141 ↗
14. Siguerdidjane W, Khameneifar F, Gosselin FP (2020) Efficient planning of peen-forming patterns via artificial neural networks. Manufact Lett 25:70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.08.00110.1016/j.mfglet.2020.08.001 ↗
15. van Rees WM, Matsumoto EA, Gladman AS, Lewis JA (2018) Mahadevan L: Mechanics of biomimetic 4d printed structures. Soft Matter 14(43):8771–8779. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM00990B10.1039/C8SM00990B ↗
16. Sushitskii V, van Rees WM, Levesque M, Gosselin FP (2022) Determination of optimal shot peen forming patterns using the theory of non-Euclidean plates. J Manufact Sci Eng 145(3). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405607210.1115/1.4056072 ↗
17. Kang X, Wang T, Platts J (2010) Multiple impact modelling for shot peening and peen forming. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: J Eng Manufact 224:689–697. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM167210.1243/09544054JEM1672 ↗
18. Fitzpatrick ME, Fry AT (2005) Holdway P, Kandil F, Shackleton J. Determination of residual stresses by x-ray diffraction, Suominen L
19. Zhang S, Venter A, Vorster W, Korsunsky A (2008) High-energy synchrotron x-ray analysis of residual plastic strains induced in shot-peened steel plates. J Strain Anal Eng Design 43(4):229–241. https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247JSA34110.1243/03093247JSA341 ↗
20. Levers A, Prior A (1998) Finite element analysis of shot peening. J Mater Process Technol 80–1:304–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00188-510.1016/S0924-0136(98)00188-5 ↗
21. Wang T, Platts MJ, Levers A (2006) A process model for shot peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 172:159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.00610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.006 ↗
22. Prime MB (2017) Amplified effect of mild plastic anisotropy on residual stress and strain anisotropy. Int J Solids Structures 118-119:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.022 ↗
23. Barnwal VK, Tewari A, Narasimhan K, Mishra SK (2016) Effect of plastic anisotropy on forming behavior of aa-6061 aluminum alloy sheet. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 51(7):507–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/030932471665572710.1177/0309324716655727 ↗
24. Bron F, Besson J (2004) A yield function for anisotropic materials application to aluminum alloys. Int J Plasticity 20:937–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.06.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2003.06.001 ↗
25. Faucheux PA (2019) Simulating shot peen forming with eigenstrains. PhD thesis, Polytechnique Montreal (December 2019)
26. Miao HY, levesque M, Gosselin F (2021) Peen forming and stress peen forming of 2024-T3 aluminum sheets. Part 2: eigenstrain analysis. engrXiv. https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/kwbj610.31224/osf.io/kwbj6 ↗
27. Han K, Owen D, Peric D (2002) Combined finite/discrete element and explicit/implicit simulations of peen forming process. Eng Computations. https://doi.org/10.1108/0264440021041366710.1108/02644400210413667 ↗
28. VanLuchene R, Cramer E (1996) Numerical modeling of a wing skin peen forming process. J Mater Eng Performance 5(6):753–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264691010.1007/BF02646910 ↗
29. Miao HY, Lévesque M, Gosselin FP (2022) Shot peen forming pattern optimization to achieve cylindrical and saddle target shapes: The inverse problem. CIRP J Manufac Sci Technol 36:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.11.00310.1016/j.cirpj.2021.11.003 ↗
30. van Rees WM (2017) Vouga E, Mahadevan L: Growth patterns for shape-shifting elastic bilayers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(44):11597–11602. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170902511410.1073/pnas.1709025114 ↗
31. Ciarlet PG (2005) An introduction to differential geometry with applications to elasticity. J Elasticity 78(1):1–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-005-4738-810.1007/s10659-005-4738-8 ↗
32. O’neill B (2006) Elementary Differential Geometry. Elsevier, Academic Press10.1016/B978-0-12-088735-4.50011-0 ↗
33. Do Carmo MP (2016) Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces: Revised and Updated Second Edition. Courier Dover Publications, New York
34. Liu DC (1989) Nocedal J: On the limited memory bfgs method for large scale optimization. Math Program 45(1):503–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0158911610.1007/BF01589116 ↗
35. Tamstorf R, Grinspun E (2013) Discrete bending forces and their jacobians. Graphical Models 75:362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmod.2013.07.00110.1016/j.gmod.2013.07.001 ↗
36. Lévy B, Petitjean S, Ray N, Maillot J (2002) Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 21(3):362–37110.1145/566654.566590 ↗
37. Garg G, Kuts V, Anbarjafari G (2021) Digital twin for fanuc robots: Industrial robot programming and simulation using virtual reality. Sustainability 13:10336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13181033610.3390/su131810336 ↗
38. Rockafellar RT, Wets RJ-B (2009) Variational Analysis vol. 317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
39. Umeyama S (1991) Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13(4):376–380. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.8857310.1109/34.88573 ↗
40. Test strip, holder, and gage for shot peening. Standard SAE J442, SAE International (2009)
41. Kirk D (2018) The curvature of peened almen strips and its applications. Shot Peener Mag 32(4)
42. Li H, Lu Y, Han Z, Guo X, Xu Y, Xu X, Tao J (2019) The shot peen forming of fiber metal laminates based on the aluminum-lithium alloy: Deformation characteristics. Composites Part B: Eng 158:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.08510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.085 ↗
43. Kirk D (1999) Shot peening. Aircraft engineering and aerospace technology10.1108/00022669910270727 ↗
44. Moran J (2003) An Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Aerodynamics. Courier Corporation, New York
45. Wang M, Zeng Y, Bai X, Huang X (2017) Shot peen forming on aluminum alloy saddle shape integral panels with stiffeners. Proceedings of the ICSP-13, Montreal
46. Chaise T, Li J, Nélias D, Kubler R, Taheri S, Douchet G, Robin V (2012) Gilles P Modelling of multiple impacts for the prediction of distortions and residual stresses induced by ultrasonic shot peening (usp). J Mater Process Technol 212(10):2080–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.05.005 ↗