journal article·2024-01

Polymer extrusion die design using a data-driven autoencoders technique

Chady Ghnatios, Eloi Gravot, Victor Champaney, Nicolas Verdon, Nicolas Hascoët, Francisco Chinesta

Publisher page

Abstract

Designing extrusion dies remains a tricky issue when considering polymers. In fact, polymers exhibit strong non-Newtonian rheology that manifest in noticeable viscoelastic behaviors as well as significant normal stress differences. As a consequence, when they are pushed through a die, an important die-swelling is observed, and consequently the final geometry of the extruded profile differs significantly from the one of the die. This behavior turns the die’s design into a difficult task, and its geometry must be defined in such a way that the extruded profile results in the targeted one. Numerical simulation was identified as a natural way for building and solving the inverse problem of defining the die, leading to the targeted extruded geometry. However, state-of-the-art rheological models reveal inaccuracies for the desired level of precision. In this paper, we propose a data-driven approach that, based on the accumulated experience on the extruded profiles for different dies, learns the relation enabling efficient die design.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Model Reduction and Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Sharma S, Goswami M, Deb A, Padhan B, Chattopadhyay S (2021) Structural deformation/instability of the co-extrudate rubber profiles due to die swell: experimental and cfd studies with 3d models. Chem Eng J 424:13050410.1016/j.cej.2021.130504 ↗
2. Sharma S, Sarkar K, Goswami M, Deb A, Dcunha S, Chattopadhyay S (2020) An approach to design extrusion dies for complex shaped rubber profiles using finite element analysis. J Manuf Process 57:700–71110.1016/j.jmapro.2020.07.033 ↗
3. del Coz Diaza J, Nieto PG, Mere JO, Garcia AB (2007) Computer simulation of the laminar nozzle flow of a non-newtonian fluid in a rubber extrusion process by the finite volume method and experimental comparison. J Non-Cryst Solids 353(8–10):981–98310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.12.067 ↗
4. del Coz Diaza J, Nieto PG, Garcia AB, Munozc JG, Mere JO (2008) Finite volume modeling of the non-isothermal flow of a non-newtonian fluid in a rubber’s extrusion die. J Non-Cryst Solids 354(47–51):5334–533610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.04.058 ↗
5. Wagner A, Yazici R, Kalyon DM (19963) Extrudate swell behavior of glass fiber filled polyamide 6. Polym Compos 17(6):840–84910.1002/pc.10677 ↗
6. Tang D, Marchesini FH, Cardon L, D’hooge DR (2020) State of the-art for extrudate swell of molten polymers: From fundamental understanding at molecular scale toward optimal die design at final product scale. Macromol Mater Eng 305(8–10):200034010.1002/mame.202000340 ↗
7. Ghnatios C, Hage R-M, Hage I (2019) An efficient tabu-search optimized regression for data-driven modeling. Compte Rendu Mecanique 347(11):806–81610.1016/j.crme.2019.11.006 ↗
8. Reille A, Hascoet N, Ghnatios C, Ammar A, Cueto E, Duval JL, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2019) Incremental dynamic mode decomposition: a reduced-model learner operating at the low-data limit. Comptes Rendus Mecanique 347:780–79210.1016/j.crme.2019.11.003 ↗
9. Ibanez R, Casteran F, Argerich C, Hascoet CGN, Ammar A, Cassagnau P, Chinesta F (2020) On the data-driven modeling of reactive extrusion. MDPI Fluids 5(2):9410.3390/fluids5020094 ↗
10. Liu X, Tian S, Tao F, Yu W (2021) A review of artificial neural networks in the constitutive modeling of composite materials. Compos Part B Eng 224:10915210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109152 ↗
11. Ghnatios C, Alfaro I, Gonzalez D, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2019) Data-driven generic modeling of poroviscoelastic materials. Entropy 21(12):116510.3390/e21121165 ↗
12. González D, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2019) Thermodynamically consistent data-driven computational mechanics. Contin Mech Thermodyn 31:239–25310.1007/s00161-018-0677-z ↗
13. Ghnatios C (2021) A hybrid modeling combining the proper generalized decomposition approach to data-driven model learners, with application to nonlinear biphasic materials. Comptes Rendus Mecanique 349(2):259–27310.5802/crmeca.85 ↗
14. Ghnatios C, Barasinski A (2021) A nonparametric probabilistic method to enhance pgd solutions with data-driven approach, application to the automated tape placement process, Advanced modeling and simulation in engineering sciences 8(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-021-00205-510.1186/s40323-021-00205-5 ↗
15. Ghnatios C, Montes N, Tertrais H, Duval J, Abisset-Chavanne E, Falco A, Chinesta F (2019) Towards parametric rtm processes: the interpolative mapping. Am Inst Phys Proc. doi 10(1063/1):5112637
16. Ghnatios C, Azzi M-J, Tezaur R, Avery P, Farhat C (2021) Acceleration of a nonparametric probabilistic method for model updating to enable digital twin instance applications. In: The 4th international conference and exhibition on additive manufacturing technologies, vol 1
17. Chen W, Wang W, Liu L, Lew MS (2021) New ideas and trends in deep multimodal content understanding: a review. Neurocomputing 426:195–21510.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.042 ↗
18. Jolliffe IT, Cadima J (2016) Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Phylosophical Trans R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 374(2065):1–16
19. Hea X, Heb Q, Chen J-S (2021) Deep autoencoders for physics-constrained data-driven nonlinear materials modeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 285:11403410.1016/j.cma.2021.114034 ↗
20. Kramer M (1991) Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks. AIChE Journal 27(2):233–24310.1002/aic.690370209 ↗