Introduction of the delta concept for characterising pipe yield strength
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapidly increasing demand for cleaner energies has significantly driven the need for natural gases. Consequently, pipeline manufacturing industries are flourishing, as pipelines can efficiently transport gas. A critical quality measure for these pipelines is their yield strength, because applying a higher operating pressure can reduce the transmission cost; a reasonable range of yield strength also ensures protection from failure. Studies regarding the yield strength change from a plate to pipe have been conducted over the decades and are still garnering a strong interest from steel and pipe-manufacturing companies, who need to ensure a high quality of their products. Hitherto, an effective universal measure that characterises the yield strength change from a plate/coil to a pipe has not been established. This implies that with existing measures, the pipe yield strengths can vary significantly for the same steel grades manufactured by the same groups (or by different groups across different times). The current study proposes a novel measure δ for characterising/indicating/predicting the change in pipe yield strength that is based on the recognition of the dominant role of plastic deformation. The authors argue that δ could be developed into a universal measure for steel and pipe-manufacturing industries. To verify its generality, δ was first implemented to process a wide range of pipe data collections from systematically conducted numerical simulations, followed by a series of tests conducted using a laboratory pipe-manufacturing facility, and historical experimental results conducted by different groups at different times. It was demonstrated that δ exhibited a critical advantage over the traditionally used measure (t/D ratio). Finally, a (extra) discussion on industrial data processing is provided such that this study can contribute to a larger community.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Takahashi N, Yamamoto A, Miura M, Makino H, Hamada M, Takeuchi I (2005) Fracture resistance against internal pressure on high strength over X80 line pipe. In: 1st high strength steel conference, Rome
2. Hillenbrand H-G, Liessem A, Knauf G, Niederhoff K, Bauer J (2000) Development of large-diameter pipe in grade X100. in Pipeline Technology Conference, Brugge
3. Jiao, J., C. Lu, V. Linton, and F. Barbaro, The effects of operational, testing and material characterisations on the change in yield strength from plate to pipe. In process, 2019
4. Zou T, Li D, Wu G, Peng Y (2016) Yield strength development from high strength steel plate to UOE pipe. Mater Des 89:1107–112210.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.095 ↗
5. Collins L, Rashid M (2014) Best Practices for Yield Stress Determination Using the Flattened Strap Tensile Test. In: 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers10.1115/IPC2014-33684 ↗
6. Cooreman S, Van Hoecke D, Liebeherr M, Thibaux P, Enderlin MY (2014) Measurement of mechanical properties on line pipe: comparison of different methodologies. In: 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers10.1115/IPC2014-33520 ↗
7. Zhang W, Ding D, Gu M (2012) A model for predicting the yield strength difference between pipe and plate of low-carbon microalloyed steel. Metall Mater Trans A 43(13):5308–531510.1007/s11661-012-1336-9 ↗
8. Ormandy J, Strangwood M, Davis C (2003) Effect of microalloying additions on steel plate to pipe property variations during UOE linepipe processing. Mater Sci Technol 19(5):595–60110.1179/026708303225010795 ↗
9. Yoo J-Y, Ahn S-S, Seo D-H, Song W-H, Kang K-B (2011) New development of high grade X80 to X120 pipeline steels. Mater Manuf Process 26(1):154–16010.1080/10426910903202534 ↗
10. Streisselberger A, Bauer J, Bergmann B, Schutz W (1992) Correlation of Pipe to Plate Properties--Model Calculations and Application in the Design of X 80 Line Pipe Steels. In: International Conference on Pipeline Reliability
11. Han SY, Sohn SS, Shin SY, Bae J-h, Kim HS, Lee S (2012) Effects of microstructure and yield ratio on strain hardening and Bauschinger effect in two API X80 linepipe steels. Mater Sci Eng A 551:192–19910.1016/j.msea.2012.05.007 ↗
12. Choi CW, Koh HJ, Lee S (2000) Analysis and prevention of yield strength drop during spiral piping of two high-strength API-X70 steels. Metall Mater Trans A 31(10):2669–267410.1007/s11661-000-0213-0 ↗
13. Meiwes KC, Erdelen-Peppler M, Brauer H (2014) Impact of small-scale reeling simulation on mechanical properties on line pipe steel. In: 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers10.1115/IPC2014-33161 ↗
14. Cooreman S, Van Hoecke D, Liebeherr M, Thibaux P, Enderlin MY (2016) Experimental and Numerical Study on the Evolution of Mechanical Properties During Spiral Pipe Forming. In: 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers10.1115/IPC2016-64183 ↗
15. Ren Q, Zou T, Li D, Tang D, Peng Y (2015) Numerical study on the X80 UOE pipe forming process. J Mater Process Technol 215:264–27710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.08.013 ↗
16. Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, ABAQUS/Standard user's manual. Vol. 1. 2001: Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen
17. Herynk M, Kyriakides S, Onoufriou A, Yun H (2007) Effects of the UOE/UOC pipe manufacturing processes on pipe collapse pressure. Int J Mech Sci 49(5):533–55310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.10.001 ↗
18. Lemaitre J, Chaboche J-L (1994) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge university press
19. Silvestre E, de Argandoña ES, Galdos L, Mendiguren J (2015) Comparison of three methods for material hardening parameter identification under cyclic tension-compression loadings: roll levelling CASE study. Key Eng Mater 651-65310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.957 ↗
20. Walsh WJ, Preston D (2010) Yield strength of line pipe: analysis of forming operations and flattened straps. In: 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers10.1115/IPC2010-31665 ↗
21. Hill R (1998) The mathematical theory of plasticity, vol 11. Oxford university press10.1093/oso/9780198503675.001.0001 ↗
22. Silvestre E, Mendiguren J, Galdos L, de Argandoña ES (2013) Influence in the number of backstresses on the mixed hardening Chaboche-Lemaitre model for modelling roll levelling processes. IDDRG Conference
23. Silvestre E, Mendiguren J, Galdos L, de Argandoña ES (2015) Comparison of the hardening behaviour of different steel families: from mild and stainless steel to advanced high strength steels. Int J Mech Sci 101:10–2010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.013 ↗
24. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–31310.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗
25. Yi J, Kang S-C, Choo JF, Koh H-M (2017) A Numerical Study for the Yield Strength Prediction of UOE Pipes Considering Flattening Process. In: The 27th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers
26. Tyulyukovskiy E, Huber N (2007) Neural networks for tip correction of spherical indentation curves from bulk metals and thin metal films. J Mech Phys Solids 55(2):391–41810.1016/j.jmps.2006.07.003 ↗
27. Willumeit R, Feyerabend F, Huber N (2013) Magnesium degradation as determined by artificial neural networks. Acta Biomater 9(10):8722–872910.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.042 ↗