journal article·2019-09Open access

Direct usage of the wire drawing process for large strain parameter identification

Gabriel Venet, Tudor Balan, Cyrille Baudouin, Régis Bigot

Abstract

Large strain hardening is the main material description ingredient for cold bulk forming process simulations. Hardening identification of large strains is a trade-off between cost, standardization and the ability to represent the experiment, but there are no standard procedures to date. In this proposed approach, large strains (larger than 1) are reached using an industrial wire drawing process, and measured data for identification are obtained from standard tensile tests. Fast semi-analytical post-processing was possible despite the significant process-inherited strain heterogeneity. The parameters of state-of-the-art hardening models were identified, and the robustness was demonstrated to reach far beyond the strain level attained in the experiments. As a consequence, accurate and robust large strain hardening modelling was achieved from standard (tensile test) acquisition by using industrial wire drawing pre-strains.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Avrami M (1939) Kinetics of phase change. I General Theory. J Chem Phys 7(12):1103–111210.1063/1.1750380 ↗
2. Bariani PF, Dal Negro T, Bruschi S (2004) Testing and modelling of material response to deformation in bulk metal forming. CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol. 53(2):573–59510.1016/S0007-8506(07)60030-4 ↗
3. Lin YC, Chen X-M (2011) A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater Des 32(4):1733–175910.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.048 ↗
4. Gelin JC, Ghouati O (1995) The inverse approach for the determination of constitutive equations in metal forming. CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol. 44(1):189–19210.1016/S0007-8506(07)62304-X ↗
5. Gavrus A, Massoni E, Chenot JL (1996) An inverse analysis using a finite element model for identification of rheological parameters. J Mater Process Technol 60(1):447–45410.1016/0924-0136(96)02369-2 ↗
6. Pietrzyk M, Jedrzejewski J (2001) Identification of parameters in the history dependent constitutive model for steels. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 50(1):161–16410.1016/S0007-8506(07)62095-2 ↗
7. Bruschi S, Altan T, Banabic D, Bariani PF, Brosius A, Cao J, Ghiotti A, Khraisheh M, Merklein M, Tekkaya AE (2014) Testing and modelling of material behaviour and formability in sheet metal forming. CIRP Ann 63(2):727–74910.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.005 ↗
8. Gavrus A, Massoni E, Chenot J-L (1999) Thermo-viscoplastic parameter identification formulated as an inverse finite element analysis of the hot torsion test. Steel Res Int 70(7):259–26810.1002/srin.199905637 ↗
9. Szeliga D, Pietrzyk M (2007) Testing of the inverse software for identification of rheological models of materials subjected to plastic deformation. Arch Civ Mech Eng 7(1):35–5210.1016/S1644-9665(12)60003-X ↗
10. Cao T-S, Vachey C, Montmitonnet P, Bouchard P-O (2015) Comparison of reduction ability between multi-stage cold drawing and rolling of stainless steel wire – experimental and numerical investigations of damage. J Mater Process Technol 217:30–4710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.020 ↗
11. Celentano DJ, Palacios MA, Rojas EL, Cruchaga MA, Artigas AA, Monsalve AE (2009) Simulation and experimental validation of multiple-step wire drawing processes. Finite Elem Anal Des 45(3):163–18010.1016/j.finel.2008.09.001 ↗
12. Young CM, Anderson LJ, Sherby OD (1974) On the steady state flow stress of iron at low temperature and large strains. Metall. Trans. 5(2):519–52010.1007/BF02644126 ↗
13. Dixit US, Dixit PM (1995) An analysis of the steady-state wire drawing of strain-hardening materials. J Mater Process Technol 47(3–4):201–22910.1016/0924-0136(95)85000-7 ↗
14. Luksza J, Majta J, Burdek M, Ruminski M (1998) Modelling and measurements of mechanical behaviour in multi-pass drawing process. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:398–40510.1016/S0924-0136(98)00119-8 ↗
15. Skolyszewski A, Łuksza J, Paćko M (1996) Some problems of multi-stage fine wire drawing of high-alloy steels and special alloys. J Mater Process Technol 60(1–4):155–16010.1016/0924-0136(96)02321-7 ↗
16. Kuboki T, Abe M, Neishi Y, Akiyama M (2005) Design method of die geometry and pass schedule by void index in multi-pass drawing. J Manuf Sci Eng 127(1):17310.1115/1.1830490 ↗
17. Balan T, Bigot R, Perrot-Simonetta MT, Confente M (2005) Plasticity parameters identification for steel wires. In: Presented at the Int. Conf. ESAFORM 2005, Cluj-Napoca, pp 53–56
18. Massé T, Chastel Y, Montmitonnet P, Bobadilla C, Persem N, Foissey S (2011) Impact of mechanical anisotropy on the geometry of flat-rolled fully pearlitic steel wires. J Mater Process Technol 211(1):103–11210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.002 ↗
19. Panteghini A, Genna F (2010) Effects of the strain-hardening law in the numerical simulation of wire drawing processes. Comput Mater Sci 49(2):236–24210.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.002 ↗
20. Atienza JM, Elices M (2003) Influence of residual stresses in the tensile test of cold drawn wires. Mater Struct 36(8):548–55210.1007/BF02480832 ↗
21. Simo JC (1998) Numerical analysis and simulation of plasticity. In: Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol 6. Elsevier, pp 183–49910.1016/S1570-8659(98)80009-4 ↗
22. Halouani A, Li Y, Abbès B, Guo Y-Q (Nov. 2012) Simulation of axi-symmetrical cold forging process by efficient pseudo inverse approach and direct algorithm of plasticity. Finite Elem Anal Des 61:85–9610.1016/j.finel.2012.06.011 ↗
23. Hensel A, Spittel T (1978) Kraft und Arbeitsbedarf bildsamer Formgebungsverfahren. VEB Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leizig
24. Petrov P, Abbod M (Aug. 2009) Analysis of rheological behavior of AL-CU-MG-FE-NI alloy at elevated temperatures using phenomenological flow stress model. Int J Mater Form 2(S1):371–37410.1007/s12289-009-0616-4 ↗
25. Banabic D, Sester M (Mar. 2012) Influence of material models on the accuracy of the sheet forming simulation. Mater Manuf Process 27(3):273–27710.1080/10426914.2011.578005 ↗
26. Swift HW (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1(1):1–1810.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1 ↗
27. Ludwigson DC (Oct. 1971) Modified stress-strain relation for FCC metals and alloys. Metall Trans 2(10):2825–282810.1007/BF02813258 ↗
28. Voce E (1948) The relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformations. J Inst Met 74:537–562
29. Hockett JE, Sherby OD (1975) Large strain deformation of polycrystalline metals at low homologous temperature. J Mech Phys Solids 23(2):87–9810.1016/0022-5096(75)90018-6 ↗
30. X (2007) Lemoine, “behavior Laws and their influences on numerical prediction,” presented at the 10th Esaform conference on material forming, Zaragoza. Spain 907:269–274
31. Sung JH, Kim JH, Wagoner RH (Dec. 2010) A plastic constitutive equation incorporating strain, strain-rate, and temperature. Int J Plast 26(12):1746–177110.1016/j.ijplas.2010.02.005 ↗
32. Rabahallah M, Balan T, Bouvier S, Bacroix B, Barlat F, Chung K, Teodosiu C (2009) PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION OF ADVANCED PLASTIC POTENTIALS AND IMPACT ON PLASTIC ANISOTROPY PREDICTION. Int J Plast 25(3):491–51210.1016/j.ijplas.2008.03.006 ↗