journal article·2010-04

Optimised tool-path design to reduce thinning in ISF process

G. Ambrogio, L. Filice, M. Gaudioso, G. L. Manco

Publisher page

Abstract

Although the competitiveness of the Incremental Sheet Forming process is deeply assessed, some specific aspects penalise its industrial application. In particular, the idea to take advantage of the bigger formability appears of a great interest but the non homogeneous thickness distribution reduces the industrial applicability. It is well known that the process allows to work in the critical “necking-to-tearing” space which results in a strong thinning before failure. However, a significant improvement in the thickness distribution can be obtained by using a modified tool trajectory. In fact, previous experimental investigations carried out by the authors showed that it is possible to influence the thinning phenomenon by applying a proper tool trajectory. Rather than the conventional tool path, which describes the tangent profile to the desired shape, the imposed wall angle can be modified in order to compensate the localised thinning. Unfortunately, this approach increases the process design complexity and suggests to consider the tool trajectory as a decision variable to be optimised in the process design. For this reason, an optimisation model is required in order to simplify the choice among all the possible alternatives. In this paper, a promising analytical model is highlighted and a user friendly procedure is set up to simplify the approach. Satisfactory experimental results which validate the proposed technique are also presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (7)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J. Duflou, J. Allwood: Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal. Annals of the CIRP, 54/2:88–114, 2005.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3 ↗
2. M. Shim, J.J. Park: The formability of aluminum sheet in incremental forming. International Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 113: 654–658, 2001.10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00679-3 ↗
3. Y.H. Kim, J.J. Park: Effect of process parameters on formability in incremental forming of sheet metal. International Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 130-131: 42–46, 2003.
4. L. Filice: A Phenomenology Based Approach for Modelling Material Thinning and Formability in Incremental Forming of Cylindrical Parts. Journal of Engineering Manufacture Part B, 220/.9:1449–1455, 2006.10.1243/09544054JEM595 ↗
5. G. Ambrogio, L. Filice, L. Fratini, F. Micari: Some relevant correlations between process parameters and process performance in incremental forming of metal sheets, Proceedings of the 6th Esaform Conference on Material Forming, pages. 175–178, 2003.
6. G. Hussain, L. Gao: A novel method to test the thinning limit of sheet-metals in negative incremental forming. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47: 419–435, 2007.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.015 ↗
7. G. Ambrogio: The role of tool trajectory in SPIF process formability. In Proceeding of the IX AITEM Conference, 2009.