journal article·2015-03

A new method to determine isothermal flow curves for integrated process and microstructural simulation in metal forming

W. Xiong, J. Lohmar, M. Bambach, G. Hirt

Publisher page

Abstract

Reliable isothermal flow curve data are often needed for the process simulations in metal forming technology. As a rule of thumb, at strain rates above 10−3 s −1 even isothermal compression tests are affected by deformation heating, such that the flow stress data should be corrected for stress decrease due to the temperature increase in the specimen. However, if the temperature increase during testing is larger than the interval of the nominal testing temperatures foreseen for individual tests, the compensated flow curves may show undesired kinks. When it comes to high strength materials, this phenomenon will be even more pronounced. The occurrence of kinks in compensated flow curves can be attributed to the interpolation methods used in the existing temperature compensation methods. As a remedy, an alternative strategy based on Thin Plate Spline interpolation is proposed on the example of two high strength materials. It is shown that this new strategy can be generally adopted to derive reliable isothermal flow curves over a wide range of temperatures and strain rates, especially for high strength materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Dieter GE (2000) Workability tests, forming and forging. ASM Handbook, ASM International, pp 808–826
2. Pöhlandt K (1988) Materials testing for the metal forming industry. Springer, Berlin, pp 10–115
3. Goetz RL, Semiatin SL (2001) The adiabatic correction factor for deformation heating during the uniaxial compression test. J Mater Eng Perform 10:710–71710.1361/105994901770344593 ↗
4. Zhao D (2000) Testing for deformation modelling, mechanical testing and evaluation. ASM Handb 8:798–810
5. Mirza MS, Sellars CM (2001) Modelling the hot plane strain compression test Part 1-effect of specimen geometry, strain rate, and friction on deformation. Mater Sci Technol 17:1133–114110.1179/026708301101511068 ↗
6. Spittel T, Spittel M (1987) Examination of the thermal conditions in the hot torsion test. Hutnicke Listy 42:544–551
7. Brand AJ, Karhausen K, Kopp R (1996) Microstructural simulation of nickel base alloy Inconel* 718 in production of turbine discs. Mater Sci Technol 12:963–96910.1179/mst.1996.12.11.963 ↗
8. Kada O, Miki T, Toda M, et al (1998) Calculation of isothermal flow stress by combination of FEM and simple compression test. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 17:185–18810.1016/S0007-8506(07)62814-5 ↗
9. Bambach M, Seuren S, Henke T, et al (2012) Konzepte zur integrierten Modellierung von Gefüge- und Fliespannungsentwicklung in der Simulation von Warmumformprozessen, 13. Simufact Round Table “Simulation in der Umformtechnik”
10. Karhausen KF, Kopp R (1992) Model for integrated process and microstructure simulation in hot forming. Steel Res Int 63:247–25610.1002/srin.199200509 ↗
11. Sellars CM (1986) Modelling of structural evolution during hot working processes, pp 167–18710.1016/B978-0-08-033454-7.50019-X ↗
12. Kopp R, Luce R, Leisten B, et al (2001) Flow stress measuring by use of cylindrical compression test and special application to metal forming processes. Steel Res 72:394–40110.1002/srin.200100140 ↗
13. Laasraoui A, Jonas JJ (1991) Prediction of steel flow stresses at high temperatures and strain rates. Metall Trans A 22A:1545–155810.1007/BF02667368 ↗
14. Bennett CJ, Leen SB, Williams EJ, et al (2010) A critical analysis of plastic flow behaviour in axisymmetric isothermal and Gleeble compression testing. Comput Mater Sci 50:125–13710.1016/j.commatsci.2010.07.016 ↗
15. Zhao D (1993) Temperature correction in compression tests. J Mater Process Technol 36:467–47110.1016/0924-0136(93)90058-E ↗
16. Sample VM, Field DP (1994) Constant temperature-compensated strain rate testing of aluminum. J Test Eval 22(2):127–13110.1520/JTE12646J ↗
17. Rastegaev MV (1940) New methode of uniform upsetting of specimens for determining the true deformation resistance and the coefficient of external friction (original in Russian). Zavod Lab 6:354
18. Meyer LW, Weise A, Hahn F (1997) Comparison of constitutive flow curve relations in cold and hot forming. J Phys IV France 7:13–2010.1051/jp1:1997125 ↗
19. Hochholdinger B, Grass H, Lipp A, Hora P (2009) Determination of flow curves by stack compression tests and inverse analysis for the simulation of hot forming. Conference proceeding 7th European LS-DYNA conference
20. Forestier R, Massoni E, Chastel Y (2002) Estimation of constitutive parameters using an inverse method coupled to a 3D finite element software. J Mater Process Technol 125–126:594–60110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00406-5 ↗
21. Dieter GE, Kuhn HA, Lee Semiatin S (2003) Handbook of workability and process design, chapter 6. ASM International, Ohio, pp 62–63
22. Xiong W, Wietbrock B, Saeed-Akbari A, et al (2011) Modelling the flow behavior of a High-Manganese Steel Fe-Mn23-C0.6 in consideration of dynamic recrystallization. Steel Res Int 82:127–13610.1002/srin.201000263 ↗
23. Wietbrock B, Xiong W, Bambach M, Hirt G (2011) Effect of temperature, strain rate, Manganese and Carbon content on flow behaviour of three ternary Fe-Mn-C (Fe-Mn23-C0.3, Fe-Mn23-C0.6, Fe-Mn28-C0.3) high-manganese steels. Steel Res Int 82:63–6910.1002/srin.201000248 ↗
24. Wang Y, Zhen L, Shao WZ, et al (2009) Hot working characteristics and dynamic recrystallization of delta-processed superalloy 718. J Alloys Compd 474:341–34610.1016/j.jallcom.2008.06.079 ↗
25. Medeiros SC, Prasad YVRK, Frazier WG, et al (2000) Modeling grain size during hot deformation of In 718. Scr Mater 42:1723
26. Yeom JT, Lee CS, Kim JH, et al (2007) Finite-element analysis of microstructure evolution in the cogging of an Alloy 718 ingot. Mater Sci Eng A 449–451:722–72610.1016/j.msea.2006.02.415 ↗
27. Donato G, Belongie S (2002) Approximate thin plate spline mapping, ECCV 2002, LNCS 2352, pp 21–3110.1007/3-540-47977-5_2 ↗
28. Grzhibovskis R, Bambach M, Rjasanow S, et al (2007) Adaptive cross-approximation for surface reconstruction using radial basis functions. J Eng Math 62:149–16010.1007/s10665-007-9197-8 ↗
29. Lohmar J, Bambach M (2013) Influence of different interpolation techniques on the determination of the critical conditions for the onset of dynamic recrystallisation. Mater Sci Forum 762:331–33610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.762.331 ↗