Occurrence and numerical prediction of surface defects during flanging of metallic sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface defects can develop on automotive exterior panels after drawing and flanging steps, during springback and may alter significantly the vehicle quality. These defects are characterized by a small depth below 0.5 mm and are then difficult to detect numerically. This study focuses on the surface defects for two parts: an industrial upper corner of a front door and a L-shaped part designed on purpose to reproduce at a small scale surface defects that occur after flanging. Dimensions of these defects are measured from profiles obtained either with a non-contacting method or a tridimensional measuring machine. Numerical simulations of the processes are performed with the commercial codes PamStamp2G or Abaqus and deformed meshes are analyzed in the same way as the experimental data. There is a good correlation between experiments and simulations concerning the spatial position of the defect and their dimensions. Moreover, a buckling analysis during springback is performed for the L-shaped part, showing that the position of the defect corresponds to one of the buckling mode.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Banu M, Takamura M, Hama T, Naidim O, Teodosiu C, Makinouchi A (2006) Simulation of springback and wrinkling in stamping of a dual phase steel rail-shaped part. J Mater Process Technol 173:178–18410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.023 ↗
2. Kukumura M, Yamasaki Y, Inage D, Fujita T (2004) Finite element simulation of surface defects in the automobile door outer panel. In: Ghosh S, Castro JC, Lee JK (eds) CP7712 materials processing and design: modeling, simulation and applications NUMIFORM 2004, pp 1917–1922
3. Park CD, Chung WJ, Kim BM (2007) A numerical and experimental study of surface deflections in automobile exterior panels. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:99–10210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.129 ↗
4. Le Port A, Thuillier S, Manach PY, Garabed J (2008) Experimental and numerical characterization of the surface defects of an automotive door. In: Hora P (ed) Numisheet 2008, pp 773–778
5. Andersson A (2005) Evaluation and visualization of surface defects—a numerical and experimental study on sheet-metal part. In: Smith LM, Pourboghrat F, Yoon JW, Stoughton TB (eds) CP778 volume a numisheet 2005, pp 113–11810.1063/1.2011203 ↗
6. Andersson A (2009) Evaluation and visualisation of surface defects on auto-body panels. J Mater Process Technol 209:821–83710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.078 ↗
7. Muderrisoglu A, Murata M, Ahmetoglu MA, Kinzel G, Altan T (1996) Bending, flanging, and hemming of aluminium sheet—an experimental study. J Mater Process Technol 59:10–1710.1016/0924-0136(96)02281-9 ↗
8. Li D, Luo Y, Peng Y, Hu P (2007) The numerical and analytical study on stretch flanging of V-shaped sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 189:262–26710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.035 ↗
9. GOM Optical Measuring Techniques (2009) ATOS system, 3D digitizer, developed by GOM Optical Measuring Techniques. http://www.gom.com
10. Thuillier S, Manach PY (2009) Comparison of the work-hardening of metallic sheets using tensile and shear strain paths. Int J Plast 25:733–75110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.07.002 ↗
11. Cailletaud G, Pilvin P (1994) Identification and inverse problems related to material behaviour. In: International seminar on inverse problems, Clamart, France, pp 79–86
12. Eid M (2007) Analyse du flambage des pièces embouties: application à la modélisation des défauts d’aspect. Dissertation, Ecole Polytechnique, France