Evaluation of yield criteria for forming simulations based on residual stress measurement
Source abstract
Abstract
Process induced anisotropy in sheet metal is accounted for in analytical modeling by anisotropic yield criteria. The suitability of a yield criterion for predicting sheet metal forming process is generally validated by way of its ability to predict surface strains. However, the sensitivity of surface strains to yield criteria is dependent upon strain modes, with plane strain mode exhibiting higher sensitivity. To eliminate dependency on strain modes, stresses are used to evaluate yield criteria, since forming stresses are less sensitive to strain modes. In the study, the residual stresses remaining in a hemispherical cup formed in plain strain mode is predicted using Hill48 and Barlat89 criteria. The residual stresses are experimentally characterized by using X-Ray diffraction method. Suitable yield criterion for forming simulation is validated based on the correlation of theoretical predictions with experimental residual stress values.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Banabic D, Aretz H, Comsa DS, Paraianu L (2005) An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets. Int J Plastic 21:493–51210.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.003 ↗
2. Banabic D, Bunge HJ, Pohlandt K, Tekkaya AE (2001) Formability of metallic materials: Plastic anisotropy, formability testing, forming limits. Springer publication10.1007/978-3-662-04013-3 ↗
3. Banabic D, Kuwabara T, Balan T, Comsa DS (2004) An anisotropic yield criterion for sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 157–158:462–46510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.106 ↗
4. Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I- A Yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int J Plastic 5:51–6610.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
5. Bruni C, Celeghini M, Geiger M, Gabrielli FA (2007) study of techniques in the evaluation of springback and residual stress in hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:929–93910.1007/s00170-006-0539-x ↗
6. Buttle DJ, Dalzell W, Thayer PJ (2004) Early warnings of the onset of rolling contact fatigue by inspecting the residual stress environment of the railhead. Insight 46:344–34810.1784/insi.46.6.344.56395 ↗
7. Duchene L, Habraken AM (2005) Analysis of the sensitivity of FEM predictions to numerical parameters in deep drawing simulations. Eur J Mech A/Solids 24:614–62910.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.04.007 ↗
8. Hill R (1950) Mathematical theory of Plasticity. Oxford
9. Hopperstad OS, Berstad T, Ilstad H, Lademo OG, Langseth M (1998) Effects of the yield criterion on local deformations in numerical simulation of profile forming. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:551–55510.1016/S0924-0136(98)00203-9 ↗
10. Iadicola MA, Foecke T, Stoughton TB. Experimental procedures and results for benchmark 3: Stage 2 forming process. In Numisheet 2005.10.1063/1.2011336 ↗
11. Kleinera M, Kruxa R, Homberga W (2004) Analysis of residual stresses in high-pressure sheet metal forming. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 53:211–21410.1016/S0007-8506(07)60681-7 ↗
12. Lee BH, Keum YT, Wagoner RH (2002) Modeling of the friction caused by lubrication and surface roughness in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 130–131:60–63
13. Liao KC, Pan J, Tang SC (1998) Effects of yield surface shape on sheet metal forming simulations. Int J Numeric Methods Eng 41:559–58410.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980215)41:3<559::AID-NME299>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
14. Logan RW, Hosford WF (1980) Upper-bound anisotropic yield locus calculations assuming <111> pencil glide. Int J Mech Sci 22:419–43010.1016/0020-7403(80)90011-9 ↗
15. Mattiasson K, Sigvant M (2005) On The influence of the yield locus shape in the simulation of sheet stretch forming. In Numisheet 200510.1063/1.2011252 ↗
16. Moreira LP, Ferron G (2004) Influence of the plasticity model in sheet metal forming simulations. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1596–160310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.269 ↗
17. Paul SP (1986) X-ray diffraction residual stress techniques. In: Mills K (ed) Metals handbook: ninth edition, Vol 10. American Society for Metals, Metals Park, pp 380–392
18. Wang L, Lee TC (2006) The effect of yield criteria on the forming limit curve prediction and the deep drawing process simulation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:988–99510.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.050 ↗
19. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Overview residual stress Part 1 – Measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 17:355–36510.1179/026708301101509980 ↗
20. Zhao L, Sowerby R, Sklad MP (1996) A theoretical and experimental investigation of limit strains in sheet metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 38:1307–131710.1016/0020-7403(96)00014-8 ↗