An experimental investigation of forming load and side-wall thickness obtained by a new deep drawing die
Source abstract
Abstract
Deep drawing is an important process used for producing cups from sheet metal in large quantities. The deep drawing process is affected by many variables such as blank shape, punch and die radii, material’s formability characteristics, and many more. In order to obtain optimal process parameters with regard to part geometry, the blank and die geometry are particularly important factors. In this study, we investigated the effects of blank holder and die shapes, using six different blank holder and die shapes. We measured the distribution of blank holder force (BHF), the forming load at different drawing depths as well as thickness reduction of cup wall thickness for each set of die and punch geometries. The experimental study shows that the angle of blank and die surface influence the forming load and blank holder force distribution. Deep drawing dies with matrix and blank holder angle designed in this study provided deep drawing ratios that are about 25 % larger than those that usually can be obtained by a conventional die.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. Alexander JM (1960) An appraisal of the theory of deep drawing. Met Rev 5(19):349–409
2. Eary DF, Reed EA (1974) Techniques of press-working sheet metal. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 100–172
3. Panknin W, Mulhauser W (1957) Principles of the hydroform process. Mittleilungen der forschungrges Blechvererbeitung 24:269–277
4. Larsen B (1977) Hydromechanic forming of sheet metal. Sheet Met Ind (Feb. 1977) 162–166
5. Nakamura K (1987) Sheet metal forming with hydraulic counter pressure in Japan. Ann CIRP 36(1):191–19410.1016/S0007-8506(07)62583-9 ↗
6. Thiruvarudchelvan S (1995) A novel hydraulic-pressure augmented deep-drawing process for high draw ratios. J Mater Proc Technol 54:355–36110.1016/0924-0136(95)01799-2 ↗
7. Savas V, Secgin O (2007) A new type of drawing die design and experimental results. Material &Design 28:1330–133310.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.004 ↗
8. Fereshteh-Saniee F, Montazeran MH (2003) A comparative estimation of the forming load in the deep drawing process. J Mater Process Technol 140:555–56110.1016/S0924-0136(03)00793-3 ↗
9. Colgan M, Monaghan J (2003) Deep drawing process: analysis and experiment. Mater Proc Technol 132:35–41. (1985) 201–20410.1016/S0924-0136(02)00253-4 ↗
10. Anupam AN, Venkata R, Dixit PM (2008) Optimal blank shape prediction considering sheet thickness variation: an upper bound approach. J Mater Process Technol 196:249–25810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.046 ↗