journal article·2009-08

Difference in tensile and compressive flow stresses in austenitic stainless steel alloys and its effect on springback behavior

T. Kuwabara, R. Saito, T. Hirano, N. Oohashi

Publisher page

Abstract

V-bending test was conducted for sixteen different lots of austenitic stainless steel alloys, SUS304. The tensile flow stresses of all alloys were nearly identical to each other in the rolling and transverse directions. We found that the springback angles of all alloys were approximately 20% larger in TD-bending than RD-bending, where RD- and TD-bending refer to the modes of V-bending in which the direction of the bending stress is parallel to the rolling and transverse directions of the sheet, respectively. In order to clarify the cause of the asymmetry of springback behaviour between TD- and RD-bending, in-plane tension and compression tests were carried out for one of the alloys and a tension-compression asymmetry was observed. Consequently, we conclude that the difference in the springback angles between RD- and TD-bending is mainly caused by the significant decrease of the flow stress in the rolling direction due to the Bauschinger effect.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Kuwabara T (2008) Effect of anisotropic yield function on the accuracy of springback simulation. In: Proc. Int. Symposium “Automotive Sheet Metal Forming 19–29
2. Kuwabara T, Morita Y, Miyashita Y, Takahashi S (1995) Elastic-plastic behavior of sheet metal subjected to in-plane reverse loading. In: Proc Plasticity 95:841–844
3. Kuwabara T, Nagata K, Nakako T (2001) Measurement and analysis of the Bauschinger effect of sheet metals subjected to in-plane stress reversals. In: Proc Int Conf Advanced Materials and Processing Technol 407–414
4. Kuwabara T, Kumano Y, Ziegelheim J, Kurosaki I (2008) Difference in tension and compression behavior of phosphor bronze for electronic parts and its effect on bending behavior. J. JSTP 49(564):76–81 (in Japanese)10.9773/sosei.49.76 ↗
5. Kuwabara T (2007) Advances in experiments on metal sheets and tubes in support of constitutive modeling and forming simulations’. Int J Plasticity 23:385–41910.1016/j.ijplas.2006.06.003 ↗
6. Kocks UF, Westlake DG (1967) The importance of twinning for the ductility of CPH polycrystals. Trans Metall Soc AIME 239:1107–1109
7. Lowden MAW, Hutchinson WB (1975) Texture strengthening and strength differential in titanium-6A-4V. Metall Trans 6A:441–44810.1007/BF02658401 ↗
8. Spitzig WA, Sober RJ, Richmond O (1975) Pressure dependence of yielding and associated volume expansion in tempered martensite. Acta Metall 23(7):885–89310.1016/0001-6160(75)90205-9 ↗
9. Barlat F, Ferreira Duarte JM, Gracio JJ, Lopes AB, Rauch EF (2003) Plastic flow for non-monotonic loading conditions of an aluminum alloy sheet sample. Int J Plasticity 19(8):1215–124410.1016/S0749-6419(02)00020-7 ↗
10. Yapici GG, Beyerlein IJ, Karaman I, Tome CN (2007) Tension-compression asymmetry in severely deformed pure copper. Acta Mater 55(14):4603–461310.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.031 ↗