Variation of deep drawing steel grades’ properties in dependency of the stress state and its impact on FEA
Source abstract
Abstract
In industrial sheet metal forming processes the complexity of parts has been increased within the last decade due to the demands on ambitious designs and lightweight construction. As the forming processes are often laid out near the limit of feasibility, small variations of process parameters and materials’ properties may lead to an increased scrap rate in serial production. The consideration of varying parameters in the computerized process design is generally realizable, but especially the modelling of the material properties’ variation in numerical simulation close to reality is not investigated comprehensively yet. The varying parameters considered in a so called stochastic simulation are often limited to the mechanical properties, which can be determined within the uniaxial tensile test. As within the forming process of a complex sheet metal part different stress states occur, the batch variation under different forming conditions has to be investigated in detail. Within this work a basic investigation for the consideration of the batch variation under different stress states is presented. Three coils of the same steel grade, the mild deep drawing steel DX56, are characterised experimentally in order to investigate the scatter band of the stresses between the three batches representing material variation close to reality. For this the flow behaviour is determined under uniaxial stress condition and under biaxial stress condition. Furthermore the results of the tests under biaxial stress condition lead to a batch specific biax-stress-point, which represents a further reference point for the yield locus interpolation according to Hill 90. The forming limit diagrams are determined experimentally for the three batches in order to reproduce scattering of the onset of necking as well. Based on the experimental results, three batch specific material models for FE-simulation are prepared and used as input parameters for numerical forming simulations. Using the cross die geometry with two different initial blank geometries, different stress states can be adjusted in four reference points, covering the stress states between uniaxial and biaxial stress condition, thus, the plane strain area. Within the reference points, the effect of materials’ properties variation on the risk of failure is evaluated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Ganser M, Grossenbacher K (2007) Simulation metamodels in sheet metal forming in the early phases of the product development process. In: Forming Technology Forum07, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 13–16
2. Tekkaya AE (2000) State-of-the-art of simulation of sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 103:14–2210.1016/S0924-0136(00)00413-1 ↗
3. Roll K (2008) Simulation of sheet metal forming – necessary developments in the future. Proc. of Numisheet Conference, Interlaken, Switzerland, pp 3–11
4. Hora P (2006) Advanced constitutive models as precondition for an accurate FEM-simulation in forming applications LS-Dyna Anwendungsforum, Ulm, Germany, A-II-1-74
5. Hoffmann H, Zäh MF, Faass I, Mork R, Golle M, Griesbach B, Kerschner M (2007) Automatic process control in press shops. Key Eng Mater 344:881–88910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.344.881 ↗
6. Bonte MHA, Boogaard van den AH, Carleer BD (2006) Optimising towards robust metal forming processes. In: 9th ESAFORM conference on Material Forming, Glasgow, U.K., pp 3–8
7. Gerlach J. Sensitivity and robustness analysis for quantification of the influence of material scattering. In: Forming Technology Forum 2007, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 101–107
8. Grossenbacher K (2007) Virtual planning of the process robustness in sheet metal forming. PhD-thesis, ETH Nr. 17470, (in german)
9. Chen P, Koc M (2007) Simulation of springback variation in forming of advanced high strength steels. J Mater Process Technol 190:189–19810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.046 ↗
10. de Souza T, Rolfe BF (2010) Characterising material and process variation effects on springback robustness for a semi-cylindrical sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 52:1756–176610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.09.009 ↗
11. Merklein M (2006) Chracterisation of sheet material for leightweight construction. Meisenbach-Verlag, Bamberg (in german)
12. Proof and documentation guideline for mechanical properties of thin sheets, 2004 (in german)
13. Steinbeck G, Bleck W, Bork C-P, Evertz T, Frehn A, Masendorf R, Sonsino CM (2005) Determination of input data for numerical design of auto body sheet steels: a joint project of the steel and automotive industries. In: Steel - Future for the Automotive Industry: Proceedings Steels in Cars and Trucks 2005, Wiesbaden, pp 481–488
14. Gologranc F (1975) Contribution to the determination of flow curves in the continuous hydraulic bulge test. Reports from the Department of Forming Technologies of the university of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, (in german)
15. Diehl A, Staud D, Engel U (2008) Investigation of the mechanical behaviour of thin metal sheets using the hydraulic bulge-test. In: 4th International Conference on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture, Cardiff, Wales, UK, pp 195–198
16. Mutrux A, Hochholdinger B, Hora P (2008) A procedure for the evaluation and validation of the hydraulic biaxial experiment. Proceedings of the NUMISHEET Conference, Interlaken, Switzerland, pp 67–71
17. Gerlach J, Kessler L. A consistent approach for simplifying the material modelling in forming simulations aiming at cold rolled steel grades. Steel grips 4 (2006) No.4, 2006, pp 255–260
18. Kessler L, Gerlach J, Beier T, Linnepe M (2010) The impact of advanced material simulation parameters in press shop operations using mild steel grades. In: SAE World Congress, Detroit, paper number 2010-01-099210.4271/2010-01-0992 ↗
19. Kessler L, Gerlach J, Linnepe M (2009) Material aspects in forming simulation – How far should we go? In: 3rd Forming Technology Forum Zurich, Rüschlikon (Zürich), Switzerland, pp 15–20
20. Siegert K, Häussermann M, Lösch B, Rieger R (2000) Recent developments in hydroforming technology. J Mater Process Technol 98(2):251–25810.1016/S0924-0136(99)00206-X ↗
21. Vogt U (2009) Near-series layout of aluminium tailored heat treated blanks. In: Geiger M, Feldmann K (eds) Publishing series – Manufacturing Technology Erlangen, vol 208. Meisenbach, Bamberg (in german)
22. Gödel V, Merklein M, Oberpriller B (2010) Influence of the variation of material properties on the risk of failure in dependency of the materials flow condition during forming processes. In: ESAFORM Conference 2010, Brescia, Italy: ESAFORM, published on disk
23. Autoform: Robust Process Design, Handbook, 2010
24. Gödel V, Merklein M, Wahl M (2010) Efficient evaluation of sheet metal forming by reducing critical variables in the stochastic simulation. In: Future components - Methods and Processes, pp. 151–161, (in german)