journal article·2019-05Open access

Low-cost metal-forming process using an elastic punch and a reconfigurable multi-pin die

Ali Elghawail, Khamis Essa, Mohamed Abosaf, Abror Tolipov, Shizhong Su, Duc Pham

Abstract

Due to the need for low-cost tooling and quality parts, a new technique has been developed which brings together the benefits of both multi-point forming (MPF) and rubber-pad forming. A significant disadvantage of MPF is the time required to adjust the heights of the pins in the upper and lower matrices and align the tools. Rubber forming achieves flexibility by replacing one of the MPF pin matrices by an elastic punch. In this study, polyurethane (PU) rubber with a Shore hardness of A90 was adopted as the elastic punch material. The punch was combined with a reconfigurable MPF die to reduce both tool cost and time to set the pins to produce doubly curved parts of acceptable quality. Experimental work has been carried out to confirm the validity of the new technique. Finite element modelling (FEM) using the ABAQUS software was applied to study stress distribution numerically in the formed parts at the end of the forming process. The amounts of wrinkling and springback were employed as criteria to evaluate the quality of the formed part and to compare the results of the current (semi-MPF) approach against full-MPF results. The major outcomes of this study were time and cost reductions of at least 50% with the added benefits that there is a significant decrease in wrinkling and springback in the final formed part even without using a blank holder.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Abosaf, M., 2018. Finite element modelling of multi-point forming, PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
2. Belhassen L, Koubaa S, Wali M, Dammak F (2016) Numerical prediction of springback and ductile damage in rubber-pad forming process of aluminum sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 117:218–22610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.08.015 ↗
3. Cai ZY, Wang SH, Li MZ (2008) Numerical investigation of multi-point forming process for sheet metal: wrinkling, dimpling and springback. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(9-10):927–93610.1007/s00170-007-1045-5 ↗
4. Chen PKM, Wenner ML (2008) Experimental investigation of springback variation in forming of high strength steels. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(4):04100610.1115/1.2951941 ↗
5. Chen L, Chen H, Guo W, Chen G, Wang Q, (2014)Experimental and simulation studies of springback in rubber forming using aluminium sheet straight flanging process. Materials & Design (1980-2015). 54:354-36010.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.050 ↗
6. Elghawail A, Essa K, Abosaf M, Tolipov A, Su S, Pham D (2017) Prediction of springback in multi-point forming. Cogent Engineering 4(1):140050710.1080/23311916.2017.1400507 ↗
7. http://www.faro.com/products/metrology/faro-scanarm/overview#main ., a.o., accessed on 13/01/2017
8. Irthiea, I.K., 2014, Process analysis and design in micro deep drawing utilizing a flexible die. University of Glasgow: Doctoral dissertation
9. Kut S, Niedziałek B (2015) Numerical and experimental analysis of the process of aviation Drawpiece forming using rigid and rubber punch with various properties. Arch Metall Mater 60(3):1923–192810.1515/amm-2015-0327 ↗
10. Lee J et al (2003) Determination of forming limit of a structural aluminum tube in rubber pad bending. J Mater Process Technol 140(1):487–49310.1016/S0924-0136(03)00775-1 ↗
11. Li L, Seo YH, Heo SC, Kang BS, Kim J (2010) Numerical simulations on reducing the unloading springback with multi-step multi-point forming technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1):45–6110.1007/s00170-009-2290-6 ↗
12. Liu Y, Lin H, Lan J, Wei X (2010) Studies of the deformation styles of the rubber-pad forming process used for manufacturing metallic bipolar plates. J Power Sources 195(24):8177–818410.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.078 ↗
13. Peng L et al (2010) Fabrication of metallic bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cell by flexible forming process-numerical simulations and experiments. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology 7(3):03100910.1115/1.3207870 ↗
14. Quadrini F, Santo L, Squeo EA (2010) Flexible forming of thin aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Mod Manuf Technol 2(1):79–84
15. Ramezani M, Ripin Z, Ahmad R (2009) Numerical simulation of sheet stamping process using flexible punch. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 223(7):829–84010.1243/09544054JEM1453 ↗
16. Ramezani M, Ripin ZM, Ahmad R (2010) Sheet metal forming with the aid of flexible punch, numerical approach and experimental validation. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 3(3):196–20310.1016/j.cirpj.2010.11.002 ↗
17. Remezani M, Ripin ZM, Ahmed R (2009) Computer aided modelling of friction in rubber-pad forming process. J Mater Process Technol 209(10):4925–493410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.01.015 ↗
18. Sala G (2001) A numerical and experimental approach to optimise sheet stamping technologies: part II—aluminium alloys rubber-forming. Mater Des 22(4):299–31510.1016/S0261-3069(00)00088-1 ↗
19. Thiruvarudchelvan S (1993) Elastomers in metal forming: a review. J Mater Process Technol 39(1):55–8210.1016/0924-0136(93)90008-T ↗
20. Thiruvarudchelvan S (2002) The potential role of flexible tools in metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 122(2):293–30010.1016/S0924-0136(02)00077-8 ↗
21. Wang S, Zhongyi C, Mingzhe L, Lan Y (2012) Numerical simulation on the local stress and local deformation in multi-point stretch forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9-12):901–91110.1007/s00170-011-3663-1 ↗
22. Zareh-Desari B, Davoodi B, Vedaei-Sabegh A (2017) Investigation of deep drawing concept of multi-point forming process in terms of prevalent defects. Int J Mater Form 10(2):193–20310.1007/s12289-015-1268-1 ↗