A modified Johnson-Cook model of AA6061-O aluminum alloy with quasi-static pre-strain at high strain rates
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, specimens were first pre-stretched to different pre-strain coefficients (0, 0.4 and 0.8) under quasi-static tensile for AA6061-O aluminum alloy. Then, the specimens with different pre-strain coefficients were stretched by a high-speed tensile machine (HTM) at different strain rates (200 s− 1, 400 s− 1 and 600 s− 1). Digital image correlation (DIC) technique was employed to measure the strains. The results showed that the yield ratio increased significantly with the pre-strain increased. As the pre-strain coefficient increased, high-speed tensile strain limitation decreased and the total tensile strain limitation increased. A modified Johnson-Cook (JC) model considering pre-strain coefficient was proposed. Numerical simulations were performed using LS-DYNA with the modified JC model. The strain field of the specimen taken by the camera agreed well with the simulated strain field.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Seth M, Vohnout VJ, Daehn GS (2005) Formability of steel sheet in high velocity impact. J Mater Process Technol 168(3):390–40010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.032 ↗
2. Zia M, Fazli A, Soltanpour M (2017) Warm Electrohydraulic Forming: A Novel High Speed Forming Process. Procedia Eng 207:323–32810.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.782 ↗
3. Ma H, Huang L, Wu M, Li J (2014) Dynamic Ductility and Fragmentation for Aluminum Alloy Using Electromagnetic Ring Expansion. Procedia Eng 81:787–79210.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.077 ↗
4. Li G, Deng H, Mao Y, Zhang X, Cui J (2017) Study on AA5182 aluminum sheet formability using combined quasi-static-dynamic tensile processes. J Mater Process Technol 255:373–38610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.12.038 ↗
5. Choi MK, Huh H, Park N (2017) Process design of combined deep drawing and electromagnetic sharp edge forming of DP980 steel sheet. J Mater Process Technol 244:331–34310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.035 ↗
6. Fang J, Mo J, Li J (2017) Microstructure difference of 5052 aluminum alloys under conventional drawing and electromagnetic pulse assisted incremental drawing. Mater Charact 129:88–9710.1016/j.matchar.2017.04.035 ↗
7. Shang J, Daehn G (2011) Electromagnetically assisted sheet metal stamping. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):868–87410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.005 ↗
8. Imbert J, Worswick M (2012) Reduction of a pre-formed radius in aluminium sheet using electromagnetic and conventional forming. J Mater Process Technol 212(9):1963–197210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.04.020 ↗
9. Stiemer M, Unger J, Svendsen B, Blum H (2009) An arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian approach to the three-dimensional simulation of electromagnetic forming. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(17):1535–154710.1016/j.cma.2009.01.014 ↗
10. Luo W, Huang L, Li J, Liu X, Wang Z (2014) A novel multi-layer coil for a large and thick-walled component by electromagnetic forming. J Mater Process Technol 214(11):2811–281910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.023 ↗
11. Bagheriasl R, Worswick M, Mckinley J, Simha H (2010) An effective warm forming process; numerical and experimental study. Int J Mater Form 3:219–22210.1007/s12289-010-0746-8 ↗
12. Gao CY, Zhang LC (2012) Constitutive modelling of plasticity of fcc metals under extremely high strain rates. Int J Plasticity 32–33:121–13310.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.001 ↗
13. Lin YC, Li LT, Fu YX, Jiang YQ (2011) Hot compressive deformation behavior of 7075 Al alloy under elevated temperature. J Mater Sci 47(3):1306–131810.1007/s10853-011-5904-y ↗
14. Lin YC, Chen XM, Liu G (2010) A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile behaviors of typical high-strength alloy steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527(26):6980–698610.1016/j.msea.2010.07.061 ↗
15. Samantaray D, Mandal S, Bhaduri AK (2009) A comparative study on Johnson Cook, modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict elevated temperature flow behavior in modified 9Cr–1Mo steel. Comput Mater Sci 47(2):568–57610.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.025 ↗
16. Zavinska O, Eijndhoven SJL, Claracq J, Doelder J (2010) Constitutive model parameters estimation from rheotens steady state and resonance characteristics. Int J Mater Form 1:807–81010.1007/s12289-008-0258-y ↗
17. Etaati A, Dehghani K, Ebrahimi GR, Wang H (2013) Predicting the flow stress behavior of Ni-42.5Ti-3Cu during hot deformation using constitutive equations. Met Mater Int 19(1):5–910.1007/s12540-013-1002-9 ↗
18. Slycken JV, Verleysen P, Degrieck J, Bouquerel J, De Cooman BC (2007) The effect of silicon, aluminium and phosphor on the dynamic behavior and phenomenological modelling of multiphase TRIP steels. Met Mater Int 13(2):93–10110.1007/BF03027558 ↗
19. Chen SR, Gray GT (1996) Constitutive behavior of tantalum and tantalum-tungsten alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 27(10):2994–300610.1007/BF02663849 ↗
20. Zhao Y, Sun J, Li J, Yan Y, Wang P (2017) A comparative study on Johnson-Cook and modified Johnson-Cook constitutive material model to predict the dynamic behavior laser additive manufacturing FeCr alloy. J Alloy Compd 723:179–18710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.251 ↗
21. Jakus A, Fredenburg A, Thadhani N (2012) High-strain-rate behavior of maraging steel linear cellular alloys: Mechanical deformations. Mater Sci Eng A 534:452–45810.1016/j.msea.2011.11.093 ↗
22. Li HY, Li YH, Wang XF, Liu JJ, Wu Y (2013) A comparative study on modified Johnson Cook, modified Zerilli–Armstrong and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict the hot deformation behavior in 28CrMnMoV steel. Mater Des 49:493–50110.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.083 ↗
23. Zhang DN, Shang guan QQ, Xie CJ, Liu F (2015) A modified Johnson–Cook model of dynamic tensile behaviors for 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. J Alloy Compd 619:186–19410.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.002 ↗
24. Hou QY, Wang JT (2010) A modified Johnson–Cook constitutive model for Mg–Gd–Y alloy extended to a wide range of temperatures. Comput Mater Sci 50(1):147–15210.1016/j.commatsci.2010.07.018 ↗
25. Deng H, Mao Y, Li G, Cui J (2019) A study of electromagnetic free forming in AA5052 using digital image correlation method and FE analysis. J Manuf Process 37:595–60510.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.033 ↗
26. Ou H, Yang Y, Hu M, Li G, Cui J (2019) Forming study on a tailor rolled blank (TRB) structure- formability evaluation and model verification. J Manuf Process 44:397–40710.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.004 ↗
27. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6892-1: 2009(E) Metallic Materials-Tensile testing-Part 1: Method of test at room temperature
28. Lin YC, Liu G (2010) A new mathematical model for predicting flow stress of typical high-strength alloy steel at elevated high temperature. Comput Mater Sci 48(1):54–5810.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.026 ↗
29. Cai J, Wang K, Zhai P, Li F, Yang J (2014) A Modified Johnson-Cook Constitutive Equation to Predict Hot Deformation Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 24(1):32–4410.1007/s11665-014-1243-x ↗
30. He A, Xie G, Zhang H, Wang X (2013) A comparative study on Johnson–Cook, modified Johnson–Cook and Arrhenius-type constitutive models to predict the high temperature flow stress in 20CrMo alloy steel. Mater Des 52:677–68510.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.010 ↗
31. Shokry A (2017) A Modified Johnson–Cook Model for Flow Behavior of Alloy 800H at Intermediate Strain Rates and High Temperatures. J Mater Eng Perform 26:5723–573010.1007/s11665-017-3076-x ↗
32. Wang YP, Han Cj, Wang C, Li S (2010) A modified Johnson–Cook model for 30Cr2Ni4MoV rotor steel over a wide range of temperature and strain rate. J Mater Sci 46(9):2922–292710.1007/s10853-010-5167-z ↗
33. Tan JQ, Zhan M, Liu S, Huang T, Guo J, Yang H (2015) A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile flow behaviors of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy at high strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A 631:214–21910.1016/j.msea.2015.02.010 ↗