A technique for FEM optimization under reliability constraint of process variables in sheet metal forming
Source abstract
Abstract
A method is proposed for the optimization, by finite element analysis, of design variables of sheet metal forming processes. The method is useful when the non-controllable process parameters (e.g. the coefficient of friction or the material properties) can be modelled as random variables, introducing a degree of uncertainty into any process solution. The method is suited for problems with large FEM computational times and small process window. The problem is formulated as the minimization of a cost function, subject to a reliability constraint. The cost function is indirectly optimized through a “metamodel”, built by “Kriging” interpolation. The reliability, i.e. the failure probability, is assessed by a binary logistic regression analysis of the simulation results. The method is applied to the u-channel forming and springback problem presented in Numisheet 1993, modified by handling the blankholder force as a time-dependent variable.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Majeske KD, Hammett PC (2003) Identifying sources of variation in sheet metal stamping. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 15(5–18):5–1810.1023/A:1023993806025 ↗
2. Simpson TW, Peplinski JD, Koch PN, Allen JK (1997) On the use of statistics in design and the implications for deterministic computer experiments. Proceedings of the DETC10.1115/DETC97/DTM-3881 ↗
3. Bonte MHA, Van den Boogaard AH, Huétink J (2005) Metamodelling techniques for the optimisation of metal forming processes. Proceedings of the Esaform’05, Cluj-Napoca, pp 155–158
4. Kleiber M, Rojek J, Stocki R (2002) Reliability assessment for sheet metal forming operations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:4511–453210.1016/S0045-7825(02)00394-8 ↗
5. Li YQ, Cui ZS, Ruan XY, Zhang DJ (2005) Application of six sigma robust optimization in sheet metal forming. Proceedings of Numisheet, vol. A, Detroit, pp 819–82410.1063/1.2011323 ↗
6. Zhang W, Sheng ZQ, Shivpuri R (2005) Probabilistic design of aluminum sheet drawing for reduced risk of wrinkling and fracture. Proceedings of Numisheet, vol. A, Detroit, pp 247–25210.1063/1.2011227 ↗
7. Repalle J, Grandhi RV (2005) Reliability-based preform shape design in forging. Commun Numer Methods Eng 21:607–61710.1002/cnm.777 ↗
8. Sahai A, Schramm U, Buranathiti T, Chen W, Cao J, Xia C (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for metal forming processes. In: Numiform’04, Columbus, pp 2009–201310.1063/1.1766829 ↗
9. Buranathiti T, Cao J, Xia ZC, Chen W (2005) Probabilistic design in a sheet metal stamping process under failure analysis. Proceedings of Numisheet, vol. A, Detroit, pp 867–87210.1063/1.2011331 ↗
10. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4(4):409–43510.1214/ss/1177012413 ↗
11. Agresti A (1996) An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York
12. Booker AJ, Meckesheimer M (2004) Reliability based design optimization using design explorer. Optimization and Engineering 5:179–20510.1023/B:OPTE.0000033374.31878.15 ↗
13. Rijpkema JJM, Etman LFP, Schoofs AJG (2001) Use of design sensitivity information in response, surface and Kriging metamodels. Optimization and Engineering 2:469–48410.1023/A:1016098623669 ↗